Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "16175".
Did you mean:
1175
2007 Mar 07
1
Samba problems after latest Solaris 10 Patches
...olaris 10 Patch cluster.
What I get in my log files all the time is:
[2007/03/07 11:58:19, 2, effective(60001, 60001), real(0, 0)]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(263)
find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
_spoolss_writeprinter: Invalid handle (OTHER:11687:16175)
[2007/03/07 11:58:19, 2, effective(60001, 60001), real(0, 0)]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(263)
find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
_spoolss_writeprinter: Invalid handle (OTHER:11068:16175)
Plus when I do this on windows I get: \\lpserver\print$
&...
2009 Jun 30
2
IAX2 help needed...
...**.***.***:4673]
RR_JITTER : 0
Tx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: INVAL
Timestamp: 00000ms SCall: 04050 DCall: 16174 [**.**.***.***:4673]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass:
REGREQ
Timestamp: 00003ms SCall: 16175 DCall: 00000 [**.**.***.***:4673]
USERNAME : 5111
REFRESH : 60
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
REGACK
Timestamp: 00019ms SCall: 08339 DCall: 16175 [**.**.***.***:4673]
USERNAME : 5111
DATE TIME : 2009-06-30 15:...
2006 May 10
1
acts_as_nested_set does not work (in my case).
Hello,
I am using acts_as_nested_set. My problem is that the columns "lft" and
"rgt" get the value 0 if I create a new entity. If I delete an entity I
get negative values (-1, -2, -3) - but for all entities. Is there
anything missing? Is there any example for "acts_as_nested_set" in the
web?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2013 Mar 06
3
CentOS 5 sshd does not log IP address of reverse mapping failure
I'm running a mix of CentOS 5 and 6 servers reachable by ssh
from the Internet. Of course I allow only public key authentication
and no root login. In addition I'm running fail2ban to block
obnoxious brute force attack sources.
On CentOS 6 this is working pretty well, but on CentOS 5 there's
one class of attacks fail2ban fails to ban. (No pun intended.)
This isn't fail2ban's