search for: 16175

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "16175".

Did you mean: 1175
2007 Mar 07
1
Samba problems after latest Solaris 10 Patches
...olaris 10 Patch cluster. What I get in my log files all the time is: [2007/03/07 11:58:19, 2, effective(60001, 60001), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(263) find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: _spoolss_writeprinter: Invalid handle (OTHER:11687:16175) [2007/03/07 11:58:19, 2, effective(60001, 60001), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(263) find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: _spoolss_writeprinter: Invalid handle (OTHER:11068:16175) Plus when I do this on windows I get: \\lpserver\print$ &...
2009 Jun 30
2
IAX2 help needed...
...**.***.***:4673] RR_JITTER : 0 Tx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: INVAL Timestamp: 00000ms SCall: 04050 DCall: 16174 [**.**.***.***:4673] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: REGREQ Timestamp: 00003ms SCall: 16175 DCall: 00000 [**.**.***.***:4673] USERNAME : 5111 REFRESH : 60 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REGACK Timestamp: 00019ms SCall: 08339 DCall: 16175 [**.**.***.***:4673] USERNAME : 5111 DATE TIME : 2009-06-30 15:...
2006 May 10
1
acts_as_nested_set does not work (in my case).
Hello, I am using acts_as_nested_set. My problem is that the columns "lft" and "rgt" get the value 0 if I create a new entity. If I delete an entity I get negative values (-1, -2, -3) - but for all entities. Is there anything missing? Is there any example for "acts_as_nested_set" in the web? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2013 Mar 06
3
CentOS 5 sshd does not log IP address of reverse mapping failure
I'm running a mix of CentOS 5 and 6 servers reachable by ssh from the Internet. Of course I allow only public key authentication and no root login. In addition I'm running fail2ban to block obnoxious brute force attack sources. On CentOS 6 this is working pretty well, but on CentOS 5 there's one class of attacks fail2ban fails to ban. (No pun intended.) This isn't fail2ban's