Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "160g".
Did you mean:
160
2010 Jan 22
0
Removing large holey file does not free space 6792701 (still)
...Mounted on
zpool01 5.4T 42K 5.4T 1% /zpool01
filer01a:/$ mkfile 1024G /zpool01/largefile
^C
filer01a:/$ zfs list zpool01
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zpool01 160G 5.17T 160G /zpool01
filer01a:/$ ls -hl /zpool01/largefile
-rw------- 1 root root 1.0T 2010-01-22 15:02 /zpool01/largefile
filer01a:/$ rm /zpool01/largefile
filer01a:/$ sync...
2010 Jun 09
3
[PATCH] ocfs2: Limit default local alloc size within bitmap range.
In commit 6b82021b9e91cd689fdffadbcdb9a42597bbe764, we increase
our local alloc size and calculate how much megabytes we can
get according to group size and volume size.
But we also need to check the maximum bits a local alloc block
bitmap can have. With a bs=512, cs=32K, local volume with 160G,
it calculate 96MB while the maximum local alloc size is only
76M. So the bitmap will overflow and corrupt the system truncate
log file. See bug
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1262
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com>
---
f...
2009 Jan 12
1
ZFS size is different ?
Hi all,
I have 2 questions about ZFS.
1. I have create a snapshot in my pool1/data1, and zfs send/recv it to pool2/data2. but I found the USED in zfs list is different:
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
pool2/data2 160G 1.44T 159G /pool2/data2
pool1/data 176G 638G 175G /pool1/data1
It keep about 30,000,000 files.
The content of p_pool/p1 and backup/p_backup is almost same. But why is the size different?
2. /pool2/data2 is a RAID5 Disk Array with 8 disks, and , and /pool1/data1 is a RAIDZ2 with 5 disks....
2011 Apr 18
3
kernel panic on 5.6
I am getting:
kernel panic unable to mount root fs on unknown block (0,0)
This is just a normal box that I have use many a time to test install.
Basic one disk SATA 160G. Been using it for at least a year.
Is this that glibc issue hitting me? or something else?
Thanks,
Jerry
2005 Nov 17
1
Ext3 bad magic after upgrage FC1 to FC4
Dear All,
I have server with a 160G disk with one partition /dev/hde1. The PC had FC1
and everything was working fine. I decided to do an upgrade to FC4. Now I
can no longer mount that partition. I don't think anything happened to the
file system, but changes in kernel and modules due to the upgrade is now
making it inacc...
2013 May 09
0
Memory reservation for 32bit guests on high RAM systems
...uests that were bootable on a box with 384G of RAM:
dom0_mem total_available_memory 32bit 64bit
min:3G,max:128G 128 125G 127G
-128G 128 65G 128G
min:3G,max:-128G 240 65G 239G
min:3G,max:160G 150 115G 149G
We''re either missing something fundamental about how to configure this, or there''s a bug in ballooning or reservation that is preventing us from using the full 128G towards 32bit domains while being able to use all of the remaining RAM f...
2009 Jan 16
2
Problem setting quotas on a zfs pool
...t 1 12.1G -
target/u04 126G 93.6G
target/u04 at 1 14.5G -
target/u05 1.06T 206G
target/u05 at 1 671G -
target/zoneroot 3.70G 4.30G
target/zoneroot at 1 12.9M -
zfspool 553G 1018G
zfspool/u02 60.0G 160G
zfspool/u02 at 1 0 -
zfspool/u03 48.8G 171G
zfspool/u03 at 1 0 -
zfspool/u04 112G 108G
zfspool/u04 at 1 0 -
zfspool/u05 328G 472G
zfspool/u05 at 1 0 -
zfspool/zoneroot 3.69G 4.31G
zfspool/zonero...
2006 Jan 03
1
How to upgrade hard drive in a single drive (with LVM2) computer
This one has me stumped and I'm sure I must be missing something
trivial. What is is eludes me.
I have a 20G drive that will be replaced with a 160G drive. The /boot
partition is just a standard type 83, and the swap is an 82. The system
root partition is in a LV, as is the /home partition.
I've upgraded hard drives dozens of times without incident, but never
ona system with LVM.
I did this (booted into single-user mode):
1) Create...
2008 Nov 04
1
SATA errors on CentOS 5.2
...ilips Semiconductors SAA7146 (rev 01)
04:0e.0 Communication controller: Comtrol Corporation RocketPort 16
port w/external I/F (rev 04)
04:0f.0 Non-VGA unclassified device: PLX Technology, Inc. PCI <->
IOBus Bridge (rev 01)
The disk is a Seagate ST3250310NS (250GB) with an 8G /boot, 65G / and
160G /usr, with 2 2G swap partitions in the extended partition (!).
(Seagate - I smell trouble, but, as I said, FC9 doesn't do this at all.)
uname -a returns Linux Centos5.2SATAMaster 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP
Wed Sep 24 19:33:52 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux.
I've run the smartctl utilit...
2006 Mar 07
3
multiple DVD-+RW drives?
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi everyone<br>
<br>
I was wondering if I could fit in my backup server
2003 Aug 11
1
vinum (root on vinum too) throw_rude_remark crash: endless loop
Dear colleagues,
experimenting with vinum stripes and mirrors, I'd stuck myself with the
following:
panic: throw_rude_remark: called without config lock
(from vinumconfig.c:throw_rude_remark:103)
The system before this panic has two 160G drives with two vinum partitions on
each (one for mirrored root and one for the rest with swap between); these were
ad0 and ad2.
For the experiments, I'd added ad1 and ad3 disks, created adXh there, added
drives via vinum config, and then 1+0 vinum drive; however, I *did* forgot
adding /dev/ad...
2010 Jun 14
6
Small PC to build and run Asterisk
Hi,
I'm looking to build an Asterisk box that can run at a remote
location. Here are most of the specs of what I'm looking for:
Physical hardware
* Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separately)
* Low power consumption
* No fan or very small fan
* Hard drive (not flash memory)
Capabilities/capacity
* No GUI, no X
* Register to multiple SIP
2009 Sep 14
5
problem installing CentOS 5.3
I have a small fixed ip network at home, running red hat 9 on two
amd k6 500 Mhz boxes. One has 256 M memory and the other 320 M. They
pretty much meet my needs, but lately I have detected that the internet
sites
I frequent are requiring some more modern software than I can run. I
attempted to install
Fedora 8, but that failed on the AMD processors. So I ordered a set of
CentOS 5.3 i386
2015 Jun 24
8
rsyncing directories - sanity check
hey guys,
I need to mount a different volume onto /var so we have more room to
breathe. I'll be turning 3 servers into an elasticsearch cluster. And for
some reason when the servers were ordered the large local volume ended up
being /usr when the ES rpm likes to store it's indexes on /var.
So I'm syncing the contents of both directories to a different place, and
I'm going swap
2007 Feb 27
16
understanding zfs/thunoer "bottlenecks"?
Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance.
I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.).
According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would
2013 Aug 24
10
Help interpreting RAID1 space allocation
...ed" instead of a positive indicator that the volume is indeed
degraded"
$ mount | grep btrfs
/dev/sdc on /mnt/new-store type btrfs (rw,relatime,degraded,space_cache)
$ du -hsx /mnt/new-store
305G /mnt/new-store
$ df -h | grep new-store
/dev/sdc 932G 307G 160G 66% /mnt/new-store
$ btrfs fi show /dev/sdc
Label: ''new-store'' uuid: 14e6e9c7-b249-40ff-8be1-78fc8b26b53d
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 540.00KB
devid 2 size 465.76GB used 2.01GB path /dev/sdd
devid 1 size 465.76GB used 453.03GB path /dev/sdc
$ btrfs fi df /mnt/new-store...
2012 Oct 04
49
[RFC 00/14] arm: implement ballooning and privcmd foreign mappings based on x86 PVH
This series implements ballooning for Xen on ARM and builds and Mukesh''s
PVH privcmd stuff to implement foreign page mapping on ARM, replacing
the old "HACK: initial (very hacky) XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign" patch.
The baseline is a bit complex, it is basically Stefano''s xenarm-forlinus
branch (commit bbd6eb29214e) merged with Konrad''s linux-next-pvh branch
2008 Sep 21
3
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY
Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: 1 DUP I=190
Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
Ok, so I ran fsck manually (even with -y), but yet it refuses to clear/fix
whatever to the questions posed as fsck runs. What does this all mean?
Thanks,
-Clint
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,