search for: 1606

Hi. I'm hoping for some advise/help. I have a domain that won't seem to go online: $ wbinfo --online-status BUILTIN : active connection MY-HOST : active connection FOO : no active connection The log for the domain repeats over and over again: [2019/05/30 09:34:10.259173, 3, pid=1606, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:514(ntlmssp_sign_reset) NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - Initialising with flags: [2019/05/30 09:34:10.259208, 3, pid=1606, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=auth] ../../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_util.c:72(debug_ntlmssp_flags) Got NTLM...

...quot;) at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 #3 0x00007ffff791caa7 in __GI___fortify_fail (msg=msg at entry=0x7ffff7989c4a "buffer overflow detected") at fortify_fail.c:31 #4 0x00007ffff791acc0 in __GI___chk_fail () at chk_fail.c:28 #5 0x00007ffff791ca17 in __fdelt_chk (d=d at entry=1606) at fdelt_chk.c:25 #6 0x0000555555584c78 in safe_read (fd=fd at entry=1606, buf=buf at entry=0x7fffffffa810 "\037", len=len at entry=4) at io.c:245 #7 0x0000555555585cfe in read_buf (f=f at entry=1606, buf=buf at entry=0x7fffffffa810 "\037", len=len at entry=4) at io.c:1815 #8...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1606 Summary: internal-sftp does not drop conections properly, it will hang Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: Itanium OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2...

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1606 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1606.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 1cfafa83719546262807c40379f5cbc945efacfcb65b70fe70330173398deb31 screen-4.1.0-0.21.20120314git3c2946...

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1606 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1606.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: b3617570f453272c742f1f252cf1ea5a284cd866a658fafb4a54f773f0c1d106 libcacard-1.5.3-105.el7_2.7...

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:1606 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1606.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: cb221c439f10d2385e34815acd6e654adf318283ddfedf2374c357ad21b60bf3 cyrus-imapd-2.4.17-8.el7_3.1.x86_64...

...posix/libc_fatal.c:175 > #3 0x00007ffff791caa7 in __GI___fortify_fail > (msg=msg at entry=0x7ffff7989c4a "buffer overflow detected") at > fortify_fail.c:31 > #4 0x00007ffff791acc0 in __GI___chk_fail () at chk_fail.c:28 > #5 0x00007ffff791ca17 in __fdelt_chk (d=d at entry=1606) at fdelt_chk.c:25 > #6 0x0000555555584c78 in safe_read (fd=fd at entry=1606, > buf=buf at entry=0x7fffffffa810 "\037", len=len at entry=4) at io.c:245 > #7 0x0000555555585cfe in read_buf (f=f at entry=1606, > buf=buf at entry=0x7fffffffa810 "\037", len=len at entr...

Full_Name: Cyril Humbert Version: 1.5.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.50.159.2) Hitting ^C breaks readline history (when R is stared in an xterm). xterm -e R ^C -> arrow key and history stop working. For example, up-arrow gives "^[[A". ldd ./R.bin [../..] libreadline.so.4.1 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.4.1 (0x40020000) libncurses.so.5 =>

I got sick & tired of constant power outages with no warning, so when I saw various UPSes at the store, I decided to get one, and the one I got was a model 200897 from Newpoint (a.k.a. Power Sentry). A couple of days later the power went out and I decided to use the opportunity to hook up the UPS. I added up the wattages of the equipment I would be connecting, and found that the only way I

>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:54:39 -0500 >From: John E Hein <jhein@fallschurch.esys.com> >To: Wajihuddin Ahmed <wahmed@isb.worldwerx.com.pk> >Subject: Re: cross subnet browsing >Message-ID: <199802271854.NAA10232@lorax.ERA.COM> > >> <snip> >>Another issue I considered when I was having problems was the amount >>of time it took to resolve

...a,CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] objects[1206/1550] linked_values[0/0] Schema-DN[CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] objects[1550/1550] linked_values[0/0] Analyze and apply schema objects Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] objects[402/1606] linked_values[0/0] Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] objects[804/1606] linked_values[0/0] Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] objects[1206/1606] linked_values[0/0] Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] objects[1605/1606] linked_v...

...601 case bitc::METADATA_ATTACHMENT: { 1602 unsigned RecordLength = Record.size(); 1603 if (Record.empty() || (RecordLength - 1) % 2 == 1) 1604 return Error ("Invalid METADATA_ATTACHMENT reader!"); 1605 Instruction *Inst = InstructionList[Record[0]]; 1606 for (unsigned i = 1; i != RecordLength; i = i+2) { 1607 unsigned Kind = Record[i]; 1608 Value *Node = MDValueList.getValueFwdRef(Record[i+1]); 1609 TheMetadata.addMD(Kind, cast<MDNode>(Node), Inst); 1610 } 1611 break; 1612 } At line 1...

...TA_ATTACHMENT: { > 1602 unsigned RecordLength = Record.size(); > 1603 if (Record.empty() || (RecordLength - 1) % 2 == 1) > 1604 return Error ("Invalid METADATA_ATTACHMENT reader!"); > 1605 Instruction *Inst = InstructionList[Record[0]]; > 1606 for (unsigned i = 1; i != RecordLength; i = i+2) { > 1607 unsigned Kind = Record[i]; > 1608 Value *Node = MDValueList.getValueFwdRef(Record[i+1]); > 1609 TheMetadata.addMD(Kind, cast<MDNode>(Node), Inst); > 1610 } > 1611 break...

...3 12:10:24, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1495) get_dc_list: preferred server list: ", *" [2009/07/23 12:10:24, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1605) get_dc_list: returning 21 ip addresses in an ordered list [2009/07/23 12:10:24, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1606) get_dc_list: 10.236.113.22:389 10.236.62.21:389 10.236.30.22:389 10.236.100.22:389 10.236.94.21:389 10.236.92.21:389 10.236.114.22:389 10.91.160.41:389 10.236.113.21:389 10.236.114.21:389 10.91.160.40:389 10.236.94.22:389 10.236.92.22:389 10.236.112.22:389 10.236.112.21:389 10.154.1...

...acted,DC=domain,DC=local] > objects[1206/1550] linked_values[0/0] > Schema-DN[CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] > objects[1550/1550] linked_values[0/0] Analyze and apply schema > objects Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] > objects[402/1606] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] > objects[804/1606] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] > objects[1206/1606] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=redacted,DC=domain,DC=local] &g...

Hi,all I tried to run the generated whole-program bitcode of BIND,but I got some information: 0 lli 0x0000000000feda16 1 lli 0x0000000000fed88f 2 libpthread.so.0 0x0000003df340eee0 3 libc.so.6 0x0000003df28332f5 gsignal + 53 4 libc.so.6 0x0000003df2834b20 abort + 384 5 libc.so.6 0x0000003df282c2fa __assert_fail + 234 6 lli

Hello! I have 2 Samba 4 server (4.3.3) as VC and other Samba 4 (4.3) as Fileserver, until now all ok, but I'm one doubts, how to validate that in both servers the domain IDs of the users of this identical, a simple way to do this validation? I wanted to make sure it is a DC die fileserver has to go 100%. thank you

I am not able to join a second domain controller to the domain, though. Is this a samba bug, or is there something I can do to fix the WERR_DS_DRA_MISSING_PARENT error? Daniel McFeeters ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 11:34:09 AM >

...) << "': " << *LI << '\n'); 1600 return false; 1601 } 1602 unsigned SuccNum = GetSuccessorNumber(Pred, LoadBB); 1603 toSplit.push_back(std::make_pair(Pred->getTerminator(), SuccNum)); 1604 NeedToSplitEdges = true; 1605 } 1606 } 1607 if (NeedToSplitEdges) 1608 return false; Because it iterates over predecessors it may happen that not the first one has IndirectBrInst terminator. However some "toSplit" edges can be already added. Is this OK? Maybe I just misunderstood something? Regards -- Jakub Stasza...

...TUP.t\~msstfof.t\Word97.stf';run setup again from were you ariginally ran it im stumped, what should i be doing here differently...thanks ............................... Daniel W. Schar Dept of Biology (OBEE), UCLA 621 Charles Young Dr. South Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606