search for: 16.97

"[.ggobiDataset" <- function(x, ..., drop=FALSE) { x <- as.data.frame(x) NextMethod("[", x) } "[[.ggobiDataset" <- function(x, ..., drop=FALSE) { x <- as.data.frame(x) NextMethod("[[", x) } "$.ggobiDataset" <- function(x, ..., drop=FALSE) { x <- as.data.frame(x) NextMethod("$", x) } > class(x) [1]

I've used the scatterplot3d function to graph some data and had it graph a "smooth" fit. Is there a way to actualy find out the function of the surface? I've looked through the help and figured out how to get it to report the following: Family: gaussian Link function: identity Formula: y ~ s(x, z) Parametric coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)

Dear R developers, I have encountered strange behaviour of fitdistr for gamma in recent R build i.e. 2.2.0. I have attached the code for data at the end of this mail so you can reproduce the problem. In short, I am able to run fitdistr under 2.1.0 without problems, while I get the following error under 2.2.0 (Version 2.2.0 Patched (2005-11-15 r36348)) > fitdistr(otm, "gamma") Error

I have this assignment to do and after ten hours of constant trying my eyes ache and i give up.. all i'm able to get is this plot please help me these are the commands i have used till now read.table(file.choose(), sep=";", header=T) read.table(file.choose(), sep=";", header=T)->areas melt(areas,id=c("Year","State"),m=c("Rice"))->

Hi, On 2020-10-01 15:29:12 -0700, Lang Hames wrote: > 24bytes / object -- Looks like I managed module ownership correctly but > leaked the ThreadSafeModule container. This should be fixed in 5044196b412f. That helped a bit, but not yet fully. Looks like it might be still reachable memory, so leakcheck isn't that helpful. Oooh. I think I see. For various reasons the symbol names we

Hi folks, I am trying to figure out how run a repeated measures ANOVA on the following data set. subject trial frequency dplvl 1 FSI052A A 1 NA 2 FSI052B B 1 NA 3 FSI053A A 1 NA 4 FSI055A A 1 NA 5 FSI055B B 1 NA 6 FSI057A A 1 NA 7 FSI057B B 1 NA 8 FSI058A A 1 NA 9

Hello list, how could this happen? The Server doesn't respond from time to time with a high load avarage. We found a suspicious smbd process: top - 13:43:07 up 1 day, 2:27, 5 users, load average: 32.49, 58.41, 37.95 Tasks: 1196 total, 5 running, 1190 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu0 : 14.7% us, 3.8% sy, 0.0% ni, 79.8% id, 1.3% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.3% si Cpu1 : 1.3% us, 84.6%

hi, so after upgrade to the current cvs all of our problem disappear:-) but we don't have time to test the ssl part... although after I compile and install the new dovecot I stop it I do a -------------------- find /home/*/Maildir -name '.imap*' -exec rm {} \; find /home/*/Maildir -name 'dovecot-uidlist' -exec rm {} \; find /home/*/Maildir -name 'msgid.cache' -exec rm

is there a way to use the actual index value for plotting zoo objects this is the way that the index is set up and a sample range of what I would like to plot 01/01/06 00:00:00 - 01/01/06 23:45:00 { library(zoo) # chron library(chron) fmt.chron <- function(x) { chron(sub(" .*", "", x), gsub(".* (.*)", "\\1:00", x)) }} x <- structure(c(15.57, 15.5,

Hi Andres, Ok -- I've added some API for this in 438db0719681: You can get the string pool from the execution session with LLVMOrcExecutionSessionGetSymbolStringPool, then clear that with LLVMOrcSymbolStringPoolClearDeadEntries. -- Lang. On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 5:34 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andres, > > Oooh. I think I see. For various reasons the symbol

Hi, On 2020-09-30 21:31:33 -0700, Lang Hames wrote: > I've taken a first shot at hooking RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer up to the > ResourceTracker API in 7436b2ab2428. Could you let me know whether that > fixes the leak you were seeing? It did improve the situation significantly, thanks! There's still a smaller leak, unfortunately. The function comments for modules say that: /** *

Hi, I recently updated from puppet 3.1.1 to 3.2.1 and noticed quite a bit of increased load on the puppetmaster machine. I''m using the Apache/passenger/rack way of puppetmastering. Main symptom is: higher load on puppetmaster machine (8 cores): - 3.1.1: around 4 - 3.2.1: around 9-10 Any idea why there''s more load on the machine with 3.2.1? -- You received this

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

Dear R-helpers, We marked 6000 leaves from 5 SPECIES - 10 individuals/species - in two different TREATMENTs: a control and a dry-plot from which 50% of incoming precipitation was excluded. We followed those leaves for 42 months and noted the presence and absence at each visit. I then carried out a Cox Harzard model to see differences in leaf mortality between parcels and among species over time:

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download