search for: 15e6ba8a

On Nov 14, 2013, at 3:16 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Personally, I rather not do this, without very clear and compelling reasons. > > I understand that this could be very useful for your bringup (and so could be very useful locally), but once the passmanager is the default, it will get lost of in-tree testing by just about everything in the compiler.

Writing a more thought-out reply.... On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > > > I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will > allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier > to

...just trying to get a tool added to the toolbox so that a unittest I'm already writing can be written more simply and in a more maintainable fashion. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131114/15e6ba8a/attachment.html>