search for: 15b0afa8

...des).? Taking a look at the source in > support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it > will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is set > via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. > > In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the > httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags are > notably absent of --with-suexec-umask.? I also did a prep of the sources > and no patches modify the suexec sources in this way.? I may have missed something but it seems to work in my test: # grep -i...

...c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, >>> it >>> will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is >>> set >>> via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. >>> >>> In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the >>> httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags are >>> notably absent of --with-suexec-umask.? I also did a prep of the >>> sources >>> and no patches modify the suexec sources in this way. >> >> I may have missed s...

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

...d SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is set via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags are notably absent of --with-suexec-umask.? I also did a prep of the sources and no patches modify the suexec sources in this way.? I similarly checked CentOS 7.8 httpd-2.4.6-93.el7.centos.src.rpm with the same result....

...at the source in >> support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it >> will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is set >> via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. >> >> In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the >> httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags are >> notably absent of --with-suexec-umask.? I also did a prep of the sources >> and no patches modify the suexec sources in this way. > > I may have missed something but it seems to work in...

...UEXEC_UMASK set to some value, >>>> it >>>> will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is >>>> set >>>> via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. >>>> >>>> In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the >>>> httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags are >>>> notably absent of --with-suexec-umask.? I also did a prep of the >>>> sources >>>> and no patches modify the suexec sources in this way. >>> >>...