search for: 157k

Hi all, just after sending a message to sunmanagers I realized that my question should rather have gone here. So sunmanagers please excus ethe double post: I have inherited a X4140 (8 SAS slots) and have just setup the system with Solaris 10 09. I first setup the system on a mirrored pool over the first two disks pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME

...t Version: 0.6.15 Title: Create Compact Hash Digests of R Objects Depends: R (>= 2.4.1) Suggests: knitr, rmarkdown Built: R 3.4.3; x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0; 2018-01-29 05:21:06 UTC; unix Archs: digest.so.dSYM yet the _same directory_ only has: digest_0.6.14.tgz 15-Jan-2018 21:36 157K I presume this is a temporary accident. We are all spoiled by you all providing such a wonderfully robust and well-oiled service---so again big THANKS for that--but today something is out of order. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org

...of R Objects > | Depends: R (>= 2.4.1) > | Suggests: knitr, rmarkdown > | Built: R 3.4.3; x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0; 2018-01-29 05:21:06 UTC; unix > | Archs: digest.so.dSYM > | > | yet the _same directory_ only has: > | > | digest_0.6.14.tgz 15-Jan-2018 21:36 157K > | > | I presume this is a temporary accident. > | > | We are all spoiled by you all providing such a wonderfully robust and > | well-oiled service---so again big THANKS for that--but today something is out > | of order. > | > | Dirk > | > | -- > | http://dirk...

...y-1.9.2-p290, this may take a while depending on your connection... % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 8604k 100 8604k 0 0 394k 0 0:00:21 0:00:21 --:--:-- 157k ruby-1.9.2-p290 - #extracting ruby-1.9.2-p290 to /Users/fkrihely/.rvm/src/ruby-1.9.2-p290 ruby-1.9.2-p290 - #extracted to /Users/fkrihely/.rvm/src/ruby-1.9.2-p290 ruby-1.9.2-p290 - #configuring ruby-1.9.2-p290 - #compiling ruby-1.9.2-p290 - #installing Removing old Rubygems files... Installing ruby...

...mlinuz" in your > configs instead of "../shared/vmlinuz" (which is prone to issues). Because pxelinux.0, bootia32.efi and bootx64.efi are different names, so I can put them in the same path, no problem for this, i.e. $ ls -alFh /tftpboot/nbi_img/{*.0,*.efi} -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/bootia32.efi -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 160K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/bootx64.efi -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 105K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/gpxelinux.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/lpxelinux.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42K Apr 22 15:30 /...

...5 | Title: Create Compact Hash Digests of R Objects | Depends: R (>= 2.4.1) | Suggests: knitr, rmarkdown | Built: R 3.4.3; x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0; 2018-01-29 05:21:06 UTC; unix | Archs: digest.so.dSYM | | yet the _same directory_ only has: | | digest_0.6.14.tgz 15-Jan-2018 21:36 157K | | I presume this is a temporary accident. | | We are all spoiled by you all providing such a wonderfully robust and | well-oiled service---so again big THANKS for that--but today something is out | of order. | | Dirk | | -- | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org |...

...> configs instead of "../shared/vmlinuz" (which is prone to issues). > Because pxelinux.0, bootia32.efi and bootx64.efi are different names, so > I can put them in the same path, no problem for this, i.e. > $ ls -alFh /tftpboot/nbi_img/{*.0,*.efi} > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/bootia32.efi > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 160K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/bootx64.efi > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 105K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/gpxelinux.0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74K Apr 22 15:30 /tftpboot/nbi_img/lpxelinux.0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root...

...#39;s purpose is to default traffic via the CGCO table and connection): Chain tcpre (3 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 1310K 1862M RETURN all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match !0x0/0xc0 157K 14M MARK all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x40 42 5537 MARK all -- * * 10.75.22.101 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x80 and given the following entry in the /proc/net/ip_conntrack udp 17 59 src=99.228.107.5 dst=6...

...dTo: darrenm at opensolaris.org ReportedBy: hua.tang at sun.com QAContact: hua.tang at sun.com CC: zfs-crypto-discuss at opensolaris.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 -bash-3.2$ zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT pool_101992_1 1016M 157K 1016M 0% ONLINE - pool_105153_2 1016M 122K 1016M 0% ONLINE - -bash-3.2$ zpool key -l Key Load Error: Key already loaded. Enter in hexadecmial key for ''pool_105153_2'': ===> Enter "test" here Enter again: ===> Enter "tttt" here free(80bbd...

...Digests of R Objects > Depends: R (>= 2.4.1) > Suggests: knitr, rmarkdown > Built: R 3.4.3; x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0; 2018-01-29 05:21:06 UTC; unix > Archs: digest.so.dSYM > > yet the _same directory_ only has: > > digest_0.6.14.tgz 15-Jan-2018 21:36 157K > > I presume this is a temporary accident. > > We are all spoiled by you all providing such a wonderfully robust and > well-oiled service---so again big THANKS for that--but today something is out > of order. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelb...

Dear Syslinux developers, I'd like to continue the discussion about this: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-February/021659.html i.e. different directories for *.c32 files of BIOS, EFI32, and EFI64. I am wondering why we can not have *.c32 for the COMBOOT files of BIOS, *.e32 for the COMBOOT files of EFI32 *.e64 for the COMBOOT files of EFI64 As now the ldlinux file of syslinux 6.0x has,

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

...52K 269K 97M 9K 9K 3 69K 355K 168M 12K 12K 3 90K 467K 291M 17K 17K 3 119K 614K 504M 22K 22K 3 157K 808K 873M 29K 29K 3 206K 1064K 1513M 38K 38K 3 272K 1400K 2070M 45K 45K 4 366K 1647K 4195M 119K 35K 4 280K...

Joseph Little wrote: > I''d love to "vote" to have this addressed, but apparently votes for > bugs are no available to outsiders. > > What''s limiting Stanford EE''s move to using ZFS entirely for our > snapshoting filesystems and multi-tier storage is the inability to > access .zfs directories and snapshots in particular on NFSv3 clients.

I am setting to a shorewall system with 4 NIC''s as per the outline specification below. Can anyone please have a look and let me know what I have missed and what I have got wrong as I want to take this system live ASAP but do not want to kill internet access and the hosting for too long ! I have listed below the system outline & have attached the config files that I have changed, if