search for: 15732

...Ubuntu packaging. I agree that the autotools support in compiler-rt was limited but it was doing the job correctly... Could you consider reverting this changes? Thanks, Sylvestre PS: I don't mind switching to cmake but here are still a few blocking bugs: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15732

...ystem last year when this > came up, there is a PR somewhere in the system about the blocking things > that need to work in cmake to get it to happen. I don't know where we are > on that list or what features people still need. Was this the PR: http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15732 ? -Tom > > Personally I still use the autoconf system, but am willing to remove it if > we can get to a single system, but all of the requirements need to be > handled first. > > -eric > > > > For example, I personally use automake, and the only reason I don'...

Hello, all. I'm a fairly new maintainer of Gentoo packages for LLVM and clang. I'm trying to improve the way LLVM is built on Gentoo, and that's why I'm wondering which of the build systems of LLVM is supported better. As far as I'm aware, LLVM can be currently built using one of the two build systems: - one built on top of autoconf with custom Makefiles, - the other one

...> > came up, there is a PR somewhere in the system about the blocking things > > that need to work in cmake to get it to happen. I don't know where we are > > on that list or what features people still need. > > Was this the PR: http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15732 <http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15732> ? > > > Looks like it yes. > > -eric > > -Tom > > > > > Personally I still use the autoconf system, but am willing to remove it if > > we can get to a single system, but all of the requirements ne...

...99252 18648 ? S 07:52 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes --foreground root 59090 0.0 0.2 699252 18648 ? S 07:52 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes --foreground root 59091 0.0 0.1 693020 15732 ? S 07:52 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes --foreground root 59092 0.0 0.2 699252 18648 ? S 07:52 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes --foreground root 59093 0.0 0.2 699252 18648 ?...

LLVMDev, PR 15732 is the umbrella tracking the progress of making the CMake build system feature equivalent to the autotools one. One of the biggest outstanding tasks is PR 21562, which I've been viewing more as a "We really need to fix how we build Compiler-RT." I've thought about this quite a bi...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.21 release series. Changes since 4.21.1 -------------------- o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15732: smbd fails to correctly check sharemode against OVERWRITE ???? dispositions. ?? * BUG 15754: Panic in close_directory. o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipensky at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15752: winexe no longer works with samba 4.21. o? Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14356:...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.21 release series. Changes since 4.21.1 -------------------- o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15732: smbd fails to correctly check sharemode against OVERWRITE ???? dispositions. ?? * BUG 15754: Panic in close_directory. o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipensky at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15752: winexe no longer works with samba 4.21. o? Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14356:...

Hello, I need to have this for :create and :login how do I do so validates_presence_of :login, :password, :password_confirmation, :user_name, :email, :on => :create I do need it to be off in a number of places though -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...---- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15590: libldb: performance issue with indexes (ldb 2.9.2 is already ???? released). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15624: DH reconnect error handling can lead to stale sharemode entries. ?? * BUG 15732: smbd fails to correctly check sharemode against OVERWRITE ???? dispositions. o? Andr?as Leroux <aleroux at tranquil.it> ?? * BUG 15692: Missing conversion for msDS-UserTGTLifetime, msDS- ???? ComputerTGTLifetime and msDS-ServiceTGTLifetime on "samba-tool ???? domain auth policy mod...

...---- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15590: libldb: performance issue with indexes (ldb 2.9.2 is already ???? released). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15624: DH reconnect error handling can lead to stale sharemode entries. ?? * BUG 15732: smbd fails to correctly check sharemode against OVERWRITE ???? dispositions. o? Andr?as Leroux <aleroux at tranquil.it> ?? * BUG 15692: Missing conversion for msDS-UserTGTLifetime, msDS- ???? ComputerTGTLifetime and msDS-ServiceTGTLifetime on "samba-tool ???? domain auth policy mod...

Hello, I work on CMake upstream. I'd like to find out in what ways CMake upstream does not fit the needs of llvm/clang, and then fill those gaps. The recent update of the minimum version to CMake 2.8.8 is a good start. Before being able to assess what is missing, it should be ensured that the current codebase is as modern as the minimum version allows, and it needs to be cleaned up. 1)

On 6/1/15 6:42 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote: > Looping in cfe-dev because I should have send this there too from the > start. > > -Chris > >> On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> >> wrote: >> >> LLVMDev, >> >> PR 15732 is the umbrella tracking the progress of making the CMake >> build system feature equivalent to the autotools one. One of the >> biggest outstanding tasks is PR 21562, which I've been viewing more >> as a "We really need to fix how we build Compiler-RT." +1 >&gt...

Hi, I would like to propose deprecating the autoconf build system at some point in the future. Maintaining two build systems is a hassle not only for this project, but also for other projects that use LLVM and have to deal with the slight differences in output between the two build systems. It seems like most people are using CMake at this point, so my questions to the community are: - Is

...11168 DVRManager + MFServer: Crashes 11614 Adobe Premiere Pro 2 tryout installer fails on first run 12025 Objects in Alien Shooter 2 demo and Nvidia legacy driver aren't drawn 14287 Windows Live Installer does not start 14694 Grandia2: Selected mode is not supported by the video 15732 BPM Studio crashes when playing a sound 15754 ripp it's installer is hidden, z - order issue 15953 Firefox: drag (and drop) doesn't work at all 16390 ct offline update: cmd crash by starting the downloads 16435 spss 17 "SPSSWinWrapIDE.exe" aborts with ITypeInfo_fnInvo...

...e the one doing the work, and I'm not volunteering. :) Do what you think is best. I mostly wanted to present a possible alternative approach. > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > LLVMDev, > > PR 15732 is the umbrella tracking the progress of making the CMake build system feature equivalent to the autotools one. One of the biggest outstanding tasks is PR 21562, which I've been viewing more as a "We really need to fix how we build Compiler-RT." > > I've thought about this...

Hello, thank you for the thoughts. > Have you seen the docs for CMake3.0 [1] (see cmake-buildsystem > especially)? They certainly aren't perfect but they are considerably > better than what was there before. Okay, the documentation has come a long way since 3.0 although it still needs a bit of polish. > I wouldn't say that much "important functionality is plain

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. > > The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on

On 11/9/15 5:49 PM, John Reagan wrote: > That would be fine with me. I just don't want some new visitor to > come along and see "CMake only" and get discouraged and leave. Well, it is going to be "CMake only". Anyone who depends on autotools is going to be stuck on whatever the last revision is that we shipped with it. And I really don't see it being feasible