search for: 15625

...; + result += ((s64)info.arg[1] * volt->speedo) / 10; > + result += ((s64)info.arg[2] * volt->speedo * volt->speedo) / 100000; > + } else if (ver == 0x20) { > + switch (info.mode) { > + /* 0x0 handled above! */ > + case 0x1: > + result = ((s64)info.arg[0] * 15625) >> 18; > + result += ((s64)info.arg[1] * volt->speedo * 15625) >> 18; > + result += ((s64)info.arg[2] * temp * 15625) >> 10; > + result += ((s64)info.arg[3] * volt->speedo * temp * 15625) >> 18; > + result += ((s64)info.arg[4] * volt->speedo...

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: >> + result = ((s64)info.arg[0] * 15625) >> >> 18; >> + result += ((s64)info.arg[1] * volt->speedo >> * 15625) >> 18; >> + result += ((s64)info.arg[2] * temp * >> 15625) >> 10; >> + result +=...

...sult = (s64)info.arg[0] / 10; + result += ((s64)info.arg[1] * volt->speedo) / 10; + result += ((s64)info.arg[2] * volt->speedo * volt->speedo) / 100000; + } else if (ver == 0x20) { + switch (info.mode) { + /* 0x0 handled above! */ + case 0x1: + result = ((s64)info.arg[0] * 15625) >> 18; + result += ((s64)info.arg[1] * volt->speedo * 15625) >> 18; + result += ((s64)info.arg[2] * temp * 15625) >> 10; + result += ((s64)info.arg[3] * volt->speedo * temp * 15625) >> 18; + result += ((s64)info.arg[4] * volt->speedo * volt->speedo *...

...st fine. Now I try to insert OPUS1.3 in the path but cannot make it work. The audio passes through but ends up “down pitched” and heavily distorted. Due to the 32MHz base clock (+ prescalers) available it is not possible to get the desired 16kHz sample rate. I am therefore forced to work with 15625Hz. As I understand it the opus encoder does not mind a strange sample rate as it will re-sample it to 48kHz (Correct?). The decoder, however, will always output 48kHz, 24kHz, 16kHz etc (Correct?) which is incompatible with my 15625Hz rate. (However; If my assumptions are correct there could be a...

...ot;" "" "800" "" "" "" [41] "900" "" "" "" "1000" > > y <- x * x > y [1] 10000 5625 2500 625 0 625 2500 5625 10000 [10] 15625 22500 30625 40000 50625 62500 75625 90000 105625 [19] 122500 140625 160000 180625 202500 225625 250000 275625 302500 [28] 330625 360000 390625 422500 455625 490000 525625 562500 600625 [37] 640000 680625 722500 765625 810000 855625 902500 950625 1000000 >...

...name] where filename is the name of the RPM. In order to install some of these packages, you may need to have a newer version of RPM installed. Information about obtaining the new version of RPM is included in RHSA-2000:051. 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for more info): 15625 - Root exploit alread posted on bugtraq 15630 - Root exploit in sperl 15641 - suidperl has a major problem 6. RPMs required: Red Hat Linux 5.0: Red Hat Linux 5.2: sparc: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/sparc/mailx-8.1.1-16.sparc.rpm ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/sparc/perl-5.004m7-2.sparc.rpm alp...

...test stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. Changes since 4.19.6 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function (ldb 2.8.1 is already released). ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances (ldb 2.8.1 is already ???? released). o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15638: Need to change gitlab-ci.yml tags in all branches to avoid CI ????...

...test stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. Changes since 4.19.6 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function (ldb 2.8.1 is already released). ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances (ldb 2.8.1 is already ???? released). o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15638: Need to change gitlab-ci.yml tags in all branches to avoid CI ????...

Hi, does anyone know how to uninstall rubygem? I installed and it had the notorious hanging problem that no one seems to have an answer to. So I am going to attempt to install Rails without gems. Could someone point me in the right direction if you would not answer me? =) Regards, Edmund -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...g> ?? * BUG 15662: vfs_widelinks with DFS shares breaks case insensitivity. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 13213: Samba build is not reproducible. ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function. ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15638: Need to change gitlab-ci.yml tags in all branches to avoid CI ???? bill. ?? * BUG 15654: We have added ne...

...g> ?? * BUG 15662: vfs_widelinks with DFS shares breaks case insensitivity. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 13213: Samba build is not reproducible. ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function. ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15638: Need to change gitlab-ci.yml tags in all branches to avoid CI ???? bill. ?? * BUG 15654: We have added ne...

...slog instead of mail, and restricts the list of variables /bin/mail will read from the environment. 4. Solution: For each RPM for your particular architecture, run: rpm -Fvh [filename] where filename is the name of the RPM. 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for more info): 15625 - Root exploit alread posted on bugtraq 15630 - Root exploit in sperl 15641 - suidperl has a major problem 6. RPMs required: Red Hat Linux 5.0, 5.1, 5.2: sparc: ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/sparc/mailx-8.1.1-16.sparc.rpm ftp://updates.redhat.com/5.2/sparc/perl-5.004m7-2.sparc.rpm alpha: ftp://...

...ot make it work. The >> audio passes through but ends up “down pitched” and heavily distorted. >> >> >> >> Due to the 32MHz base clock (+ prescalers) available it is not possible >> to get the desired 16kHz sample rate. I am therefore forced to work with >> 15625Hz. >> >> >> >> As I understand it the opus encoder does not mind a strange sample rate >> as it will re-sample it to 48kHz (Correct?). The decoder, however, will >> always output 48kHz, 24kHz, 16kHz etc (Correct?) which is incompatible with >> my 15625Hz ra...

I've splitted my big series between the part which actually fixes the engine reclocking bits and the part handling voltage/clock updates on temperature change, so that the more reviewed parts can be merged in faster. This series fixes a lot of Engine reclocking issues found on Fermi, Kepler and all Maxwell generation GPUs. It does _not_ fix memory reclocking on Fermi. It mostly contains of

We are slowly getting there! v4 of the series with some realy good improvements, so I am sure this is like 95% done and only needs some proper polishing and proper Reviews! I also added the NvVoltOffsetmV module parameter, so that a user is able to over and !under!-volt the GPU. Overvolting makes sense, when there are still some reclocking issues left, which might be solved by a higher voltage.

...Direct3D adapter. 13233 FSX Demo fails to start. 13539 Equalizer in foolbar2000 does not work 13921 Installation of Quest Toad 9.6.1 fails with file access error message 14786 mkv2vob halts with the message "error getting mkv info" 15486 Impulse: Cannot connect to server 15625 Fujiprint/Rossmann fails to save its books as a file 17416 urlmon/url sometimes fails (race condition) 17518 winmm/mci tests fail with +heap enabled 18856 using selectSingleNode method : "xmlXPathEval: evaluation failed" 20129 FaleWEB crashes on startup 20421 Return to Mys...

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...0 455 0 0.01 420 0 0.01 420 version.ll 4 4038 0 0.01 4007 0 0.01 4007 VirtThread.ll 5 14767 0 0.01 14735 0 0.01 14735 visual.ll 2 1713 0 0.01 1696 0 0.01 1696 vla.ll 5 9414 0 0.01 9405 0 0.01 9405 vlalloc.ll 3 15326 0 0.01 15292 0 0.01 15292 vlc.ll 33 148671 0 0.02 148650 0 0.02 142630 vl_comp.ll 2 15625 0 0.01 15591 0 0.01 15591 volume.ll 1 4513 0 0.01 4488 0 0.01 4488 vor.ll 12 87187 0 0.02 87165 0 0.02 87165 vprobes.ll 2 94612 0 0.01 94579 0 0.01 94579 walksub.ll 1 7504 0 0.01 7486 0 0.01 7486 warshall.ll 2 9631 0 0.01 9605 0 0.01 9605 watesides.ll 1 20153 0 0.01 20120 0 0.01 20120 wc.ll 21 3076...