search for: 15556

...When I am using module acl_tdb and I am trying to get access to directory I am getting call trace in log.ip Best regards! /Adrian Berlin =============================================================== [2010/03/24 13:54:05.295901, 0] lib/fault.c:47(fault_report) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 15556 (3.5.1) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO [2010/03/24 13:54:05.295940, 0] lib/fault.c:49(fault_report) From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf [2010/03/24 13:54:05.295978, 0] lib/fault.c:50(fault_report) ============================================...

..._32_C This way, Clang takes care of setting the SRet attribute wherever appropriate and LLVM takes care of putting such return values onto stack in the Win32/MSVC32 ABI. What do you think about such a proposal? One more data point: the ABI is wrong even in C! http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15556 -- Timur

...rst part of the procedure seemed to work, then came page after page of error messages. Can someone tell me what is going on here and how I can fix the problem? I found a similar report on R-help that was never resolved and also involved a MAC (http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e4/help/08/06/15556.html ). Could this be a MAC issue? Thanks very much for your time. Brant Inman [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

How can a frontend tell LLVM to put a function argument on stack/register/etc? On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote: >> Ah, got it. >> Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?.. > No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov >

ok, guys i have followed the self referential recipe from the book it works perfect but now i have some doubts, at the end the model are modified to force the user beign added as a friend that add too who are adding him so how i can make that the full relationship doesn?t be complete until the friend beign added approves it(talking in the implementation of the code of course)? by the way,

> Ah, got it. > Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?.. No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

...of setting the SRet attribute wherever appropriate > and LLVM takes care of putting such return values onto stack in the > Win32/MSVC32 ABI. > > What do you think about such a proposal? > > One more data point: the ABI is wrong even in C! > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15556 > > -- > Timur

...n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural | 0.0828 11800 0.0720 * 0.0702 | 0.25 0.27 0.48 * 0.56 | 0.93 0.52 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2 | 0.0848 15556 0.0809 * 0.0790 | 0.47 0.48 0.68 * 0.76 | 0.98 0.69 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft | 0.4160 99264 0.6636 * 0.6371 | 0.31 0.35 0.31 * 1.00...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When