search for: 1517260

...]. Can you search for the string "option shared-brick-count" in > the files in /var/lib/glusterd/vols/<volumename> and let us know the > value? The workaround to get this working on the cluster is available in > [2]. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260#c19 > > > Regards, > Nithya > > On 23 February 2018 at 15:12, Daniele Frulla <daniele.frulla at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have done a migration to new version of gluster but >> when i doing a com...

...might be running into [1]. Can you search for the string "option shared-brick-count" in the files in /var/lib/glusterd/vols/<volumename> and let us know the value? The workaround to get this working on the cluster is available in [2]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260#c19 Regards, Nithya On 23 February 2018 at 15:12, Daniele Frulla <daniele.frulla at gmail.com> wrote: > I have done a migration to new version of gluster but > when i doing a command > > df -h > > the result of spac...

I have done a migration to new version of gluster but when i doing a command df -h the result of space are minor of total. Configuration: 2 peers Brick serda2:/glusterfs/p2/b2 49152 0 Y 1560 Brick serda1:/glusterfs/p2/b2 49152 0 Y 1462 Brick serda1:/glusterfs/p1/b1 49153 0 Y 1476 Brick serda2:/glusterfs/p1/b1

Hi Stefan, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. Please take a look at [1] and try out the workaround provided in the comments. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 On 9 March 2018 at 13:37, Stefan Solbrig <stefan.solbrig at ur.de> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have a problem with df after I upgraded from 3.12.4 to 3.12.6 > All four bricks are shown als online, and all bricks are being used. > gluster v stats shows the correct sizes for all...

Dear all, I have a problem with df after I upgraded from 3.12.4 to 3.12.6 All four bricks are shown als online, and all bricks are being used. gluster v stats shows the correct sizes for all devices. However, df does not show the correct glusterfs volume size. It seems to me that it "forgets" one brick. Although all bricks are used when I'm writing files. best wishes, Stefan

...h gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you >> may be running into this. Please take a look at [1] and try out the >> workaround provided in the comments. >> >> >> Regards, >> Nithya >> >> >> >> [1]?https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260> >> >> On 9 March 2018 at 13:37, Stefan Solbrig <stefan.solbrig at ur.de >> <mailto:stefan.solbrig at ur.de>> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I have a problem with df? afte...

...e reason. Perhaps the volfiles were not regenerated after upgrading to the version with the fix. There is a workaround detailed in [2] for the time being (you will need to copy the shell script into the correct directory for your Gluster release). [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260#c19 On 17 April 2018 at 09:58, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com> wrote: > To clarify, I was on 3.13.2 previously, recently updated to 4.0.1, and the > bug seems to persist in 4.0.1. > > > Sincerely, > Artem > > -- > Founder, Android Police <http://w...

...into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I > realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is > smaller than the aggregated capacity of all...

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

...; values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep > -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other > nodes so we can check if they are the cause. > > > Regards, > Nithya > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 > > On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I >> realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is >> smaller th...

...us "grep >> -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other >> nodes so we can check if they are the cause. >> >> >> Regards, >> Nithya >> >> >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 >> >> On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I >>> realized that the total size reported by df command was change...

...re" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other >>> nodes so we can check if they are the cause. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nithya >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 >>> >>> On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I >>>> realized that the tot...

...medisk1/*" results for the other >>>> nodes so we can check if they are the cause. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Nithya >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 >>>> >>>> On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I >>&g...

To clarify, I was on 3.13.2 previously, recently updated to 4.0.1, and the bug seems to persist in 4.0.1. Sincerely, Artem -- Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC beerpla.net | +ArtemRussakovskii <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR <http://twitter.com/ArtemR> On Mon, Apr

...>>>> other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Nithya >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 >>>>> >>>>> On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was work...

...we can check if they are the cause. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Nithya >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 28 February 2018 at 03:03, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some days ago all my glus...

pylon:/var/lib/glusterd/vols/dev_apkmirror_data # ack shared-brick-count dev_apkmirror_data.pylon.mnt-pylon_block3-dev_apkmirror_data.vol 3: option shared-brick-count 3 dev_apkmirror_data.pylon.mnt-pylon_block2-dev_apkmirror_data.vol 3: option shared-brick-count 3 dev_apkmirror_data.pylon.mnt-pylon_block1-dev_apkmirror_data.vol 3: option shared-brick-count 3 Sincerely, Artem --