search for: 150g

I need to shrink /home(755G) to 150GB and use free space to add to the existing /(50G). #df -kh Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_root 50G 7.8G 40G 17% / tmpfs 7.8G 384K 7.8G 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda2 485M 79M 381M 18% /boot /dev/sda1 200M 256K...

Hi, I am facing issue with zfs destroy, this takes almost 3 Hours to delete the snapshot of size 150G. Could you please help me to resolve this issue, why zfs destroy takes this much time. While taking snapshot, it''s done within few seconds. I have tried with removing with old snapshot but still problem is same. =========================== I am using : Release : OpenSolaris Developm...

Hi, I am running the below command on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) # df -hT --total Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 xfs 150G 8.0G 143G 6% / devtmpfs devtmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 817M 7.0G 11% /run tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/9...

...Sep 29, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for blocking everyone for so long. No pb, thanks very much for taking care of it :) > It has been more than a year since the last upgrade, and mysql is adjusting schema for a table with ~150G data on a single VM instance. 150GB? I’m very surprised there is so much data in our phab! That seems huge... — Mehdi > Sadly, the progress bar isn't giving useful information (plus I am not a good system admin), so I couldn't tell the ETA... > > FYI: According to previous ma...

Is there any ETA? -Krzysztof On 9/29/2016 5:34 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev wrote: > That was a bad estimation. Database upgrade is taking time. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:03 AM Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com > <mailto:ioeric at google.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Phabricator(reviews.llvm.org <http://reviews.llvm.org>) will be down > for

...ric Liu via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for blocking everyone for so long. > > > No pb, thanks very much for taking care of it :) > > It has been more than a year since the last upgrade, and mysql is > adjusting schema for a table with ~150G data on a single VM instance. > > > 150GB? I’m very surprised there is so much data in our phab! That seems > huge... > > > My guess is that this includes all the diffs for every revision of every > review (as well as all the comments, etc), and it probably isn't as clev...

Hi John, Ashish, Still no luck . I have tried your commands in root folder. It's showing max size 384 only in home directory. But if i try df -h shown 579. Is there any way to find out recycle bin folder On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Ashish Yadav <gwalashish at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chandran, > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Chandran Manikandan <tech2mani at

...ric Liu via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for blocking everyone for so long. > > > No pb, thanks very much for taking care of it :) > > It has been more than a year since the last upgrade, and mysql is > adjusting schema for a table with ~150G data on a single VM instance. > > > 150GB? I’m very surprised there is so much data in our phab! That seems > huge... > > > My guess is that this includes all the diffs for every revision of every > review (as well as all the comments, etc), and it probably isn't as clev...

...e things (like heavy scientific computing). We also pretty much don't use any drives under 1TB. The upshot is we had custom scripts for > 500GB, which made 4 partitions - /boot (1G, to fit with the preupgrade), swap (2G), / (497G - and we're considering downsizing that to 250G, or maybe 150G) and the rest in another partition for users' data and programs. The installer absolutely does *not* want to do what we want. We want swap - 2G - as the *second* partition. But if we use the installer, as soon as we create the third partition, of 497GB, for /, it immediately reorders them, so t...

...12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 477M 146M 306M 33% /boot /dev/mapper/vg_free-lv_home 30G 7.1G 23G 25% /home /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvpgsql 30G 671M 30G 3% /var/lib/pgsql /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvimages 150G 61G 90G 41% /var/lib/libvirt/images /dev/mapper/vgdata-lvhome2 1.8T 470G 1.4T 26% /home2 # du -hs /home/* 398M /home/downloads 16K /home/ipsloth 16K /home/junk 4.1G /home/observers 32M /home/pierce 2.5G /home/scac 2.5GB + 4.1 GB + the odds and e...

...OS comes from polish. > We also pretty much don't use any drives under 1TB. The upshot is we had > custom scripts for > 500GB, which made 4 partitions - /boot (1G, to fit > with the preupgrade), swap (2G), / (497G - and we're considering > downsizing that to 250G, or maybe 150G) and the rest in another partition > for users' data and programs. The installer absolutely does *not* want to > do what we want. We want swap - 2G - as the *second* partition. But if we > use the installer, as soon as we create the third partition, of 497GB, for > /, it immediately...

...s.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Sorry for blocking everyone for so long. > > No pb, thanks very much for taking care of it :) > >> It has been more than a year since the last upgrade, and mysql is adjusting schema for a table with ~150G data on a single VM instance. > > 150GB? I’m very surprised there is so much data in our phab! That seems huge... > > My guess is that this includes all the diffs for every revision of every review (as well as all the comments, etc), and it probably isn't as clever with diffs as f...

...gt; /dev/sda1 477M 146M 306M 33% /boot > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lv_home > 30G 7.1G 23G 25% /home > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvpgsql > 30G 671M 30G 3% /var/lib/pgsql > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvimages > 150G 61G 90G 41% /var/lib/libvirt/images > /dev/mapper/vgdata-lvhome2 > 1.8T 470G 1.4T 26% /home2 > > # du -hs /home/* > 398M /home/downloads > 16K /home/ipsloth > 16K /home/junk > 4.1G /home/observers > 32M /home/pierce > 2.5...

Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit : > What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size > in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume > will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset > raid5 at the time a mount point is created (raid5 is set after the > fact), there isn't a clear way to say "use

1. ext4 mke2fs -b 4096 -m 5 -t ext4 -O^uninit_bg -r 1 -v /dev/sdb1 sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb 2. 150G 3. gdisk /dev/sdb x a 2 w y sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb 4. mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sdb1 cd /mnt/sdb1 extlinux -i /mnt/sdb1/boot umount /mnt/sdb1 sync;sync;sync sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb cat gptmbr.bin >/dev/sdb1 sync;sync;sync sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb 5./mnt/sdb1/boot/extlinux.conf...

...nology. >> We also pretty much don't use any drives under 1TB. The upshot is we had >> custom scripts for > 500GB, which made 4 partitions - /boot (1G, to fit >> with the preupgrade), swap (2G), / (497G - and we're considering >> downsizing that to 250G, or maybe 150G) and the rest in another partition >> for users' data and programs. The installer absolutely does *not* want to >> do what we want. We want swap - 2G - as the *second* partition. But if we >> use the installer, as soon as we create the third partition, of 497GB, for >> /...

...0 # rr_weight priorities # failback immediate # no_path_retry fail # user_friendly_name yes and multipath -ll reports : . . [snip other HSV400 paths - all similar] mpath12 (3600508b40007518f0000900000520000) dm-1 HP,HSV400 [size=150G][features=0][hwhandler=0] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][active] \_ 0:0:5:9 sdab 65:176 [active][ready] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled] \_ 0:0:3:9 sdn 8:208 [active][ready] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled] \_ 0:0:4:9 sdu 65:64 [active][ready] mpath11 (3600508b40007518f0000700000370000) dm...

...0 # rr_weight priorities # failback immediate # no_path_retry fail # user_friendly_name yes and multipath -ll reports : . . [snip other HSV400 paths - all similar] mpath12 (3600508b40007518f0000900000520000) dm-1 HP,HSV400 [size=150G][features=0][hwhandler=0] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][active] \_ 0:0:5:9 sdab 65:176 [active][ready] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled] \_ 0:0:3:9 sdn 8:208 [active][ready] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled] \_ 0:0:4:9 sdu 65:64 [active][ready] mpath11 (3600508b40007518f0000700000370000) dm...

Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday, thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report section... Also not sure why there's an issue with automount either.... but I guess I could ask on that issue as well. I am not worried about the NAMED error, this is something that happens due to one of the services that

I've spent the better part of two working days reading the NUT code and documentation and thinking about typical modern use cases for the software. I'm now questioning whether I want to get any further involved with this project, because it seems to me that the codebase is a huge and complicated pile of machinery mainly aimed at solving problems that no longer matter. I could be wrong