Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "149g".
Did you mean:
149
2010 Sep 17
3
ZFS Dataset lost structure
...ructure of this dataset.
However i can send a snapshot of this dataset to another system, but the same behavior occurs.
If i do
zdb -dddd dataset
at the end of the output i can se the references to my file:
Object lvl iblk dblk dsize lsize %full type
7 5 16K 128K 149G 256G 58.26 ZFS plain file
264 bonus ZFS znode
dnode flags: USED_BYTES USERUSED_ACCOUNTED
dnode maxblkid: 2097152
path /vdisk.raw
uid 777
gid 60001
atime Sun Oct 18 00:49:05 2009
mti...
2012 Apr 16
2
Any options on crypt+zfs ?
...three users tops.
I followed the handbook and made the geli step on the disks:
Geom name: label/zfs1.eli
State: ACTIVE
EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS
KeyLength: 128
Crypto: software
UsedKey: 0
Flags: NONE
KeysAllocated: 38
KeysTotal: 38
Providers:
1. Name: label/zfs1.eli
Mediasize: 160041881600 (149G)
Sectorsize: 4096
Mode: r1w1e1
Consumers:
1. Name: label/zfs1
Mediasize: 160041885184 (149G)
Sectorsize: 512
Mode: r1w1e1
all disks are this way (just 4 disks are on geli zfs).
would it be faster, if I had geli over zfs, and not the other way (as is now) ?
my performance is too l...
2010 Mar 05
2
ZFS replication send/receive errors out
...s
sys 5m51.895s
It ran about an hour. A full backup that succeeds takes about 6 hours
(the backup pools are external USB drives, not so fast).
bash-3.2$ zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
bup-ruin 928G 63.7G 864G 6% ONLINE /backups/bup-ruin
rpool 149G 6.41G 143G 4% ONLINE -
zp1 1.09T 637G 479G 57% ONLINE -
As you can see, it was nowhere near finished. But nothing was full,
nothing crashed.
Anybody got a spare clue? It shouldn''t, as I understand it, be possible
for a full replication stream going into a newly-...
2010 May 28
0
zpool iostat question
....00T 0 0 33 381
raidz2 201K 5.00T 0 0 1 36
c7t2d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c7t3d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c7t4d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c7t5d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c8t1d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c8t2d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c8t3d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c8t4d0 - - 0 0 47 353
c8t5d0 - - 0 0 31 352
c8t6d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c8t7d0 - - 0 0 47 352
c7t6d0(slog) 0 149G 0 0 31 345
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2013 May 09
0
Memory reservation for 32bit guests on high RAM systems
...of RAM:
dom0_mem total_available_memory 32bit 64bit
min:3G,max:128G 128 125G 127G
-128G 128 65G 128G
min:3G,max:-128G 240 65G 239G
min:3G,max:160G 150 115G 149G
We''re either missing something fundamental about how to configure this, or there''s a bug in ballooning or reservation that is preventing us from using the full 128G towards 32bit domains while being able to use all of the remaining RAM for 64 bit guests.
Anyone have any insight...
2009 Mar 28
53
Can this be done?
...c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
[root at nas01 ~]# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
rpool 149G 11.4G 138G 7% ONLINE -
tank 9.50T 9.34T 159G 98% ONLINE -
[root at nas01 ~]#