search for: 14940

...Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 14939 119997486 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda2 14940 29878 119997517+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda3 29879 30400 4192965 fd Linux raid autodetect # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Devic...

...smbclient -L doesn't set "client max protocol" to NT1 before ???? calling the "Reconnecting with SMB1 for workgroup listing" path. ?? * BUG 14944: Missing pop_sec_ctx() in error path inside close_directory(). o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipen at redhat.com> ?? * BUG 14940: Cross device copy of the crossrename module always fails. ?? * BUG 14941: symlinkat function from VFS cap module always fails with an ???? error. ?? * BUG 14942: Fix possible fsp pointer deference. o? Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14934: kill_tcp_connections does not work....

...smbclient -L doesn't set "client max protocol" to NT1 before ???? calling the "Reconnecting with SMB1 for workgroup listing" path. ?? * BUG 14944: Missing pop_sec_ctx() in error path inside close_directory(). o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipen at redhat.com> ?? * BUG 14940: Cross device copy of the crossrename module always fails. ?? * BUG 14941: symlinkat function from VFS cap module always fails with an ???? error. ?? * BUG 14942: Fix possible fsp pointer deference. o? Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14934: kill_tcp_connections does not work....

Hello. Can someone please help me read this error log located in the log folder? [ displays ''ESC'' in my editor, but did not display in this copy and paste. so i''m wondering what that means too.. Session ID: cefa85a414c483d345b4e2fd5ce9449c / ^ just the session id / Parameters: {"action"=>"index",

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...14080 14081 14082 14149 14151 14156 14157 14183 14186 14305 14308 14359 14366 14455 14477 14479 14481 14490 14491 14566 14622 14640 14644 14653 14661 14662 14663 14664 14708 14712 14732 14733 14734 14755 14781 14805 14807 14808 14809 14825 14832 14833 14853 14860 14902 14905 14907 14908 14929 14931 14940 14954 14955 15010 15021 15026 15037 15039 15057 15058 15062 15065 15066 15142 15143 15145 15154 15169 15172 15206 15220 15294 15398 15424 15435 15436 15512 15558 15569 15616 15634 15649 15653 15776 15778 15827 15868 15870 15899 15900 15920 15926 15927 15928 15929 15944 15946 15948 16013 16014 16015...

...ng at 6545 Match failed at index 6562 Continuing at 6593 Match failed at index 6610 Continuing at 6641 Continuing at 6642 Match failed at index 6658 Continuing at 6772 Match failed at index 6788 Continuing at 6902 Continuing at 13636 Match failed at index 13640 Continuing at 14940 Match failed at index 14943 Continuing at 15415 Match failed at index 15417 Continuing at 15570 Match failed at index 15571 Continuing at 15598 Match failed at index 15599 Continuing at 15716 Match failed at index 15719 Continuing at 15837 Match failed at index 15840 Continu...

...uing at 6642 >>>> Match failed at index 6658 >>>> Continuing at 6772 >>>> Match failed at index 6788 >>>> Continuing at 6902 >>>> Continuing at 13636 >>>> Match failed at index 13640 >>>> Continuing at 14940 >>>> Match failed at index 14943 >>>> Continuing at 15415 >>>> Match failed at index 15417 >>>> Continuing at 15570 >>>> Match failed at index 15571 >>>> Continuing at 15598 >>>> Match failed at index...

...gt;>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 6902 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 13636 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Match failed at index 13640 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 14940 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Match failed at index 14943 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 15415 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Match failed at index 15417 >>>>>>>>>>>&g...

...149 14151 14156 14157 14183 14186 14305 14308 14359 > 14366 14455 14477 14479 14481 14490 14491 14566 14622 14640 14644 14653 > 14661 14662 14663 14664 14708 14712 14732 14733 14734 14755 14781 14805 > 14807 14808 14809 14825 14832 14833 14853 14860 14902 14905 14907 14908 > 14929 14931 14940 14954 14955 15010 15021 15026 15037 15039 15057 15058 > 15062 15065 15066 15142 15143 15145 15154 15169 15172 15206 15220 15294 > 15398 15424 15435 15436 15512 15558 15569 15616 15634 15649 15653 15776 > 15778 15827 15868 15870 15899 15900 15920 15926 15927 15928 15929 15944 > 15946 159...

Have you read http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html and http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html ? http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#instruction-selector describes how to define a store instruction. -Eli On 7/6/2017 6:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev wrote: > Please correct me i m stuck at this point. > > On Jul 6, 2017 5:18 PM, "hameeza ahmed"

...ng at 6545 Match failed at index 6562 Continuing at 6593 Match failed at index 6610 Continuing at 6641 Continuing at 6642 Match failed at index 6658 Continuing at 6772 Match failed at index 6788 Continuing at 6902 Continuing at 13636 Match failed at index 13640 Continuing at 14940 Match failed at index 14943 Continuing at 15415 Match failed at index 15417 Continuing at 15570 Match failed at index 15571 Continuing at 15598 Match failed at index 15599 Continuing at 15716 Match failed at index 15719 Continuing at 15837 Match failed at index 15840 Continu...