search for: 14809

...Links: 1 Blockcount: 208 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x4165bae5 -- Thu Oct 7 17:53:41 2004 atime: 0x4165bade -- Thu Oct 7 17:53:34 2004 mtime: 0x4165bae5 -- Thu Oct 7 17:53:41 2004 BLOCKS: (0-10):14775-14785, (11):14787, (IND):14788, (12-18):14789-14795, (19-24):14804-14809 TOTAL: 26 Inode: 209219 Type: regular Mode: 0644 Flags: 0x0 Generation: 3550218717 User: 0 Group: 0 Size: 102400 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 1 Blockcount: 208 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x4165bae8 -- Thu Oct 7 17:53:44 2004 atime: 0x4165...

Hi Timo, Sorry to bother you, but I'm used to having at least 10-20 in the morning. This morning there are none... and the last one is from 3:00pm yesterday? So, this is a test, I guess... -- Best regards, Charles

...--------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.14 release series. Changes since 4.14.7 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14742: Python ldb.msg_diff() memory handling failure. ?? * BUG 14805: OpenDir() loses the correct errno return. ?? * BUG 14809: Shares with variable substitutions cause core dump upon ???? connection from MacOS Big Sur 11.5.2. ?? * BUG 14816: Fix pathref open of a filesystem fifo in the DISABLE_OPATH ???? build. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14806: Address a signifcant performance regressio...

...--------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.14 release series. Changes since 4.14.7 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14742: Python ldb.msg_diff() memory handling failure. ?? * BUG 14805: OpenDir() loses the correct errno return. ?? * BUG 14809: Shares with variable substitutions cause core dump upon ???? connection from MacOS Big Sur 11.5.2. ?? * BUG 14816: Fix pathref open of a filesystem fifo in the DISABLE_OPATH ???? build. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14806: Address a signifcant performance regressio...

...uot;)), class = c("dates", "times" )), srvCompDT = structure(c(743, 12429, 3585, 4364, 13227, 13578, 13591, 8585, 9587, 13913, 14753, 13247, 2246, 1439, 8845, 7018, 12625, -552, 5688, 7080, 13255, 13549, 12709, 13969, 13997, 9532, 13689, 1226, 13549, 4093, 13423, 13801, 3181, 14809, 13353, 9457, 7745, 8986, 4759, 4486, 6449, 11172, 8669, 3344, 13745, 12275, 5081, 13605, 8006, 3048, 6330, 13521, 5254, 1733, 14095, 8516, 4848, 13521, 5970, 14697, 8291, 139, 11435, 3567, 8961, 5775, 3602, 1409, 11577, 12163, 12258, 13156, 9472, 7963, 1362, 10332, 9557, 3997, 7509, 4691, 313...

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...13980 13986 13989 13999 14001 14007 14008 14010 14043 14044 14065 14077 14080 14081 14082 14149 14151 14156 14157 14183 14186 14305 14308 14359 14366 14455 14477 14479 14481 14490 14491 14566 14622 14640 14644 14653 14661 14662 14663 14664 14708 14712 14732 14733 14734 14755 14781 14805 14807 14808 14809 14825 14832 14833 14853 14860 14902 14905 14907 14908 14929 14931 14940 14954 14955 15010 15021 15026 15037 15039 15057 15058 15062 15065 15066 15142 15143 15145 15154 15169 15172 15206 15220 15294 15398 15424 15435 15436 15512 15558 15569 15616 15634 15649 15653 15776 15778 15827 15868 15870 15899...

...999 14001 14007 14008 14010 14043 14044 14065 14077 > 14080 14081 14082 14149 14151 14156 14157 14183 14186 14305 14308 14359 > 14366 14455 14477 14479 14481 14490 14491 14566 14622 14640 14644 14653 > 14661 14662 14663 14664 14708 14712 14732 14733 14734 14755 14781 14805 > 14807 14808 14809 14825 14832 14833 14853 14860 14902 14905 14907 14908 > 14929 14931 14940 14954 14955 15010 15021 15026 15037 15039 15057 15058 > 15062 15065 15066 15142 15143 15145 15154 15169 15172 15206 15220 15294 > 15398 15424 15435 15436 15512 15558 15569 15616 15634 15649 15653 15776 > 15778 158...

...280 error 4 Jan 27 23:37:52 postamt kernel: [1498954.618820] imap[14531]: segfault at 00000008 eip 080b779b esp bfcd2990 error 4 Jan 27 23:38:52 postamt kernel: [1499014.522614] imap[14664]: segfault at 00000008 eip 080b779b esp bfd249e0 error 4 Jan 27 23:39:52 postamt kernel: [1499074.837205] imap[14809]: segfault at 00000008 eip 080b779b esp bfbd5090 error 4 Jan 27 23:40:53 postamt kernel: [1499135.650847] imap[14994]: segfault at 00000008 eip 080b779b esp bfe17ad0 error 4 Jan 27 23:41:52 postamt kernel: [1499194.593713] imap[15169]: segfault at 00000008 eip 080b779b esp bfd0b1c0 error 4 Jan 27 2...

Joseph Little wrote: > I''d love to "vote" to have this addressed, but apparently votes for > bugs are no available to outsiders. > > What''s limiting Stanford EE''s move to using ZFS entirely for our > snapshoting filesystems and multi-tier storage is the inability to > access .zfs directories and snapshots in particular on NFSv3 clients.