search for: 147g

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "147g".

Did you mean: 147
2006 Oct 02
4
PCI unable to handle 64bit address space for
...of which have GUI installed. Anyways the above mentioned hardware is this INTEL SR2300 CHASSIS INTEL SE7500WV2 MAINBOARD INTEL (DUAL) XEON P4 2GHZ CPU HP 1G ECC RAM ADAPTEC 29160LP SCSI CONTROLLER PROMISE FASTRAC SOMETHING OR OTHER has nothing attached to it anyhow. I have four Seagate Cheetas 147G 10.6K SCSI harddrive most are firmware version 0006 (been meaning to update this to 00007 before i go to production) HERE IS MY PROBLEM ======================================= When i boot up the machine i get this error off the getgo PCI unable to handle 64bit address space for ================...
2008 May 09
1
disk partitioning - I'm missing something simple, I think
...mt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 sunrpc /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw 0 0 ====================================================== # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 131G 4.7G 120G 4% / /dev/sdc1 271G 147G 111G 58% /home /dev/sdd1 271G 3.9G 253G 2% /home/adminusers /dev/sda1 99M 20M 74M 22% /boot tmpfs 442M 0 442M 0% /dev/shm ====================================================== Each night, in addition to our tape backup paradigm, an rsync...
2013 Jan 18
8
migrate from physical disk problems in xen
...e issues with xen properly, or else take a long holiday... Anyway, the physical machine had a 9G drive (OS drive), a 147 G drive (not in use) and a 300G drive (all SCSI Ultra320 on the same SCSI controller) Everytime, I''ve booted linux, used dd to image the original 2 drives (ignored the 147G drive), and written each image with dd to an LV This is exported by iscsi to xen The c: works fine, and I can boot properly in VGA mode (safe mode) but the 300G drive always shows as corrupt. I''ve now upgraded to win2000 in the VM, and win2000 reports the drive as healthy (hardware) but...
2011 Dec 09
3
xen the i / O performance, network performance is only 20-30% of the real machine?
First,sorry my poor english~ Here is this test: Virtualization performance comparison test Test environment Physical machine: Cpu 8-core 8G memory HDD: 147G xen virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive wmware virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive Optical disk array (san) Size: 7.7T Speed: 6G/sec Testing and structural I / 0 performance test Test methods Test performance by dd, the script is as follows: #! / Bin / bash #...
2007 Mar 23
0
CentOS-5 beta Virtual Guest Setup Problem
...rror. /vm/8373baf3-8dd8-8559-19ad-546cf0283b0b/vncpasswd issued domain 1 reboot The xend.log and the virt-manager.log don't seem to be showing me any errors in the process, but then I just may not be interpreting them correctly. My system is a supermicro X7DBE+ with 2 Xeon 5160, 8G RAM and 4 147G SAS drives setup as raid 10. I did set the BIOS to allow virtualization. The CentOS 5 was a clean default install as a server GU with the virtualization option added. I have to admit that at best I only know enough to be dangerous, (that would be on a good day) having come over to linux from a...
2011 May 13
27
Extremely slow zpool scrub performance
Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.