Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "147995".
2009 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
..._s.dylib, then much of the problem above would never happen.
>
I am not sure if some of these problems were latent and only
exposed by the change, but the mass regressions in the g++
and libjava testsuites were triggered by the commit...
Author: rth
Date: Sat May 30 00:33:46 2009
New Revision: 147995
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147995
Log:
* cfgcleanup.c (try_crossjump_to_edge): Only skip past
NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK.
* cfglayout.c (duplicate_insn_chain): Copy epilogue insn marks.
Duplicate NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG notes.
*...
2009 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...at 11:40 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I am not sure if some of these problems were latent and only
> exposed by the change, but the mass regressions in the g++
> and libjava testsuites were triggered by the commit...
>
> Author: rth
> Date: Sat May 30 00:33:46 2009
> New Revision: 147995
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147995
2009 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/
>> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.
>> 10.5.dylib?
>> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the
>> latter, then
>> if you
2009 Sep 18
4
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/
> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.10.5.dylib?
> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the latter, then
> if you changed the FSF build of libgcc_s for darwin to have the right
> magic symbols, then
2009 Sep 18
5
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...ote:
>> I am not sure if some of these problems were latent and only
>> exposed by the change, but the mass regressions in the g++
>> and libjava testsuites were triggered by the commit...
>>
>> Author: rth
>> Date: Sat May 30 00:33:46 2009
>> New Revision: 147995
>>
>> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147995
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2009 Apr 07
0
CESA-2009:0409 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) krb5 - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0409
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0409.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/krb5-server-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390.rpm
2011 Mar 16
1
Strange error
Hi,
I'm getting many errors in samba logfiles on file server, which is NT4
domain member. Centos 5.5, Samba packages from Sernet repo, version
3.5.6-43.el5.
That error is:
[2011/03/16 09:37:49.057565, 1] smbd/service.c:678(make_connection_snum)
create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
What does that error mean? Everything is working correctly as far as i
can