search for: 146g

last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS 146G I found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon [root at PowerEdge1 pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Opened configuration file /etc/smartd.conf Aug 25 08:...

Please I need help installing NetBSD on CentOS 5.2 running Xen 3 is a amd64 bit. IBM xSeries 346 146G HHD. I had installed Centos 5.2 on top of CentOS 5.2 now I need to install NetBSD Please Help. Thanks, Augustin _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Please I need help installing NetBSD on CentOS 5.2 running Xen 3 is a amd64 bit. IBM xSeries 346 146G HHD. I had installed Centos 5.2 on top of CentOS 5.2 now I need to install NetBSD Please Help. Thanks, Augustin _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...works fine except it takes a long time to reboot (the minor problem) and the whole system will hang and need to be power cycled after a while. First, here is the zfs setup: # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT pool1 169G 23.5G 146G 13% ONLINE - pool2 408G 123G 285G 30% ONLINE - # zpool status pool: pool1 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz ONLINE 0...

Hello, Sometimes when creating hard links to the rsync destination directory, it seems like the new directory (created from the cp -al command) ends up with all the data. This causes a problem in the sense that if the rsync destination directory had 21GB, after the cp -al command, it ends up having only 8mb, then the rsync source directory determines that it now requires 21.98GB to update the

Hello, i have an 8 port sata-controller and i don''t want to spend the money for 8 x 750 GB Sata Disks right now. I''m thinking about an optimal way of building a growing raidz-pool without loosing any data. As far as i know there are two ways to achieve this: - Adding 750 GB Disks from time to time. But this would lead to multiple groups with multiple redundancy/parity disks. I

Hi!We''re trying to pinpoint our performance issues and we could use all the help to community can provide. We''re running the latest version of Nexenta on a pretty powerful machine (4x Xeon 7550, 256GB RAM, 12x 100GB Samsung SSDs for the cache, 50GB Samsung SSD for the ZIL, 10GbE on a dedicated switch, 11x pairs of 15K HDDs for the pool). We''re connecting a single Linux