Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "143186".
Did you mean:
14318
2012 Sep 21
1
[LLVMdev] How to use MCJIT by default for a target
Or we can make Eli's lit SUBTEST patch in, so that we don't have to
duplicate test cases for old JIT and MCJIT.
Regards,
chenwj
[1]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120521/143186.html
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
2012 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] How to use MCJIT by default for a target
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:42:18AM +0000, Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
> It seems to me that MCJIT would be a nice default on the platforms that support it. On the other hand, I don't like the idea of the default behavior being platform dependent.
>
> Perhaps the biggest obstacle to changing the default is that it would have complicated implications for the automated tests. The testing of
2012 Sep 19
3
[LLVMdev] How to use MCJIT by default for a target
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:42:18AM +0000, Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
> It seems to me that MCJIT would be a nice default on the platforms that support it. On the other hand, I don't like the idea of the default behavior being platform dependent.
>
> Perhaps the biggest obstacle to changing the default is that it would have complicated implications for the automated tests. The testing of