Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "142b21c0".
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
...comes at the compile-time cost of annotating all calls to relevant
builtins and all indirect calls.
Dandy - sorry for adding to the confusion.
- David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130220/142b21c0/attachment.html>
2013 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:40 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, if you're willing to sacrifice the possible simplification of all indirect calls in any function that has even one nobuiltin requirement.
>
I don't understand what you mean by this.
> 1) annotate calls
> Pro: you can inline calls without pessimizing the function you inline into
> Con: