Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "141b027f".
2013 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
> I think the cost of carrying it around is essentially zero. I'm happy to do
> any of the maintenance. People who don't know how to use it or want to learn
> how to use it don't need to use it. If it isn't making their job of writing
> tests sufficiently easier to justify, then they don't use it. I see this as
> a good pattern.
That is not the case. If the test
2013 Nov 14
7
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2013, at 3:16 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
>
> However, when we are adding interfaces or generic utilities to LLVM
> (admittedly, not the common case) I don't think we do ourselves any favors
> by using only half of the available tools to write