search for: 140g

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

hello list I have a network mounted home directory shared between all hosts on my network: [bluethundr at LCENT03:~]#df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 140G 4.4G 128G 4% / /dev/sda1 99M 35M 60M 37% /boot tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /dev/shm nas.summitnjhome.com:/mnt/nas 903G 265G 566G 32% /mnt/nas nas2.summitnjhome.com:/mnt/store 1.4T 187G 1.1T 15% /mnt/store nas2.s...

I''m not sure if this is a problem with the iscsitarget or zfs. I''d greatly appreciate it if it gets moved to the proper list. Well I''m just about out of ideas on what might be wrong.. Quick history: I installed OS 2008.05 when it was SNV_86 to try out ZFS with VMWare. Found out that multilun''s were being treated as multipaths so waited till SNV_94 came out to

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

...10M pmd [ 0.035009] 0xffff8a6d00000000-0xffff8a8000000000 76G pud [ 0.035011] 0xffff8a8000000000-0xffff968000000000 12T pgd [ 0.035013] 0xffff968000000000-0xffff96a300000000 140G pud [ 0.035014] 0xffff96a300000000-0xffff96a300001000 4K RW PCD GLB NX pte [ 0.035017] 0xffff96a300001000-0xffff96a300002000 4K pte [ 0.035018] 0xffff96a300002000-0xffff96a300003000 4K...