search for: 13mb

...performance. We are running SAMBA 2.2.3a on Dual PIII 1Ghz machines with 512MB of RAM. The server is running on a default server installation of Red Hat 7.2. We have a 500Gb RAID 5 drive using the Promise SX6000 Raid controller. Currently we are only getting a throughput of ~5MB/S for writes and ~13MB/S for reads. Comparing that to NFS which yealds ~15MB/S for reads and ~13MB/S for writes. This clearly rules out the Hardware bottleneck since XFS is able to perform better on the same hardware. Here is the smb.conf I am using currently ===SMB.CONF=== [global] workgroup = MYGROUP netbios name =...

I'm having trouble using split on a very large data-set with ~1400 levels of the factor to be split. Unfortunately, I can't reproduce it with the simple self-contained example below. As you can see, splitting the artificial dataframe of size ~13MB results in a split dataframe of ~ 144MB, with an increase memory allocation of ~10 fold for the split object. If split scales linearly, then my actual 52MB dataframe should be easily handled by my 12GB of RAM, but it is not. instead, when I try to split selectSubAct.df on one of its factors with 14...

...he server at > 60+MB/sec, some even faster. No collisions on the NICs, > nothing wrong with the network. There is a cisco Gig switch > inbetween the client and the server as well. > > Here is the bottom line: > > When the server is running samba 3, the clients get > 12-13MB/sec. > > When the server is running windows 2003, the clients get > 24-26MB/sec. > > Keep in mind the server hardware is exactly the same, the > only thing I change is the software. Windows 2003 beets up > Samba 3, hands down. On the other hand, Windows 2003 servers tend...

...re running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares using 2x1GB and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). Using NFS (3) we see up to 120MB/s (GB). How can we improve the speed ? How can we find the bottle neck ? (I tested already various samba versions (4.4{5,6}) without any success. -- Bye, Peer ________________________________________________________ Max-Planck-Institut f...

I am running 2.2.6 on a customer's site and everything has been perfect. However I noticed the other day that one of the two nmbd processes (it is a wins server) had grown to 13Mb over a two week period. I needed to update to the latest CVS version anyway and had hoped that something in that might fix things. Five days later and things are looking the same: nmbd started on Nov 9th: root 1271 0.0 0.2 3684 1456 ? S Nov09 0:10 /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd...

Hi all, I just failed in loading a saved wordspace (13MB of size), and received these errors: Warning: stack imbalance in 'missing', 52 then 51 Warning: stack imbalance in 'if', 50 then 53 Warning: stack imbalance in 'as.environment', 57 then 59 Warning: stack imbalance in 'ls', 54 then 53 Warning: stack imbalance in ...

...d reasonably consistently. I guess this should be reasonable speeds for a partition on LVM on linux software raid 0 on a pair of SATA drives near the front of the disk. This speed was observed using dd output as well as dom0 vmstat. In domU, I achieve also about 45MB/s write speed but only about 13MB/s read speed consistently, while writing to a "sda3" residing on a dedicated LVM volume on software raid 0 on the same part of disks. This speed was observed in vmstat on both dom0 and domU. This is on xen 2.0.6 with linux 2.6.9 dom0 and domU kernels. Shouldn''t dom0 and domU a...

Hi all, I am having trouble loading a ff object previously saved in a different computer. I have both files .ffData and .RData, and the first of them is 13Mb large from which I know the data is therein. But when I try to ffload it, checkdir error: cannot create /home/_myUser_ Permission denied unable to process home/_myUser_/Rtempdir/ff1a831d500b8d.ff. and some warnings. In the original computer, this temporary file...

Hello Guys, i read the official red hat documentation of "How built pxe initramfs", but it does not work" the inluded version of initramfs is about 42MB, mine 13MB. This is again one of more failure of redhat documentation. That's why i ask here. In my despair tried a very hard version: dracut -v -f -m "nfs network base" --add-drivers "nfsv4 (find /lib/modules/3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net ) $(find /lib/modules/3.10.0-514.el7...

Hello all, We are using Horde/IMP and we are having problems deleting messages from accounts where the user is very close to going over quota. My test environment includes: Horde 3 IMP 4.1.2 dovecot 1.0rc2 postfix maildrop I created a user and set the quota at 13MB. I then sent a 10MB file to the user - which was received. However, when I attempt to move the message from the INBOX to Trash, I get a Quota Exceeded error. Is this more of an IMP error than a dovecot quirk? Is the message size credited back to the quota after the message has been removed f...

...atlab (to postscript or pdf) before in the sense that the files seem smaller and less pixelated. Is this a difference in the way image() plots are produced, or with the way the image is written to the pdf() device (if anyone is familiar with other image-exporting programs...)? The other day I had a 13MB dataset, and probably plotted 3/4 of it using image() and the compressed pdf output was about 8 MB (it contained other stuff but was an addition of a few KB). I tried filled.contour(), as I understand that it colors polygons to fill contours instead of coloring rectangles at each pixel - and it has...

...atlab (to postscript or pdf) before in the sense that the files seem smaller and less pixelated. Is this a difference in the way image() plots are produced, or with the way the image is written to the pdf() device (if anyone is familiar with other image-exporting programs...)? The other day I had a 13MB dataset, and probably plotted 3/4 of it using image() and the compressed pdf output was about 8 MB (it contained other stuff but was an addition of a few KB). I tried filled.contour(), as I understand that it colors polygons to fill contours instead of coloring rectangles at each pixel - and it has...

...ata dump spot on my network for other servers to rsync to daily & use zfs snapshots for some quick backup & if it things worked out start trying to save up towards getting a thumper someday The trouble is it is too slow to really useable. At times it is fast enough to be useable, ~ 13MB/s write. However, this last for only a few minutes. It then just stalls doing nothing. iostat shows 100% blocking for one of the drives in the pool I can however use dd to read or write directly to/from the disks all at the same time with good speed (~30MB/s according to dd) The test pools...

...file list at Wed Nov 28 10:27:17 2001 > [ ...list of approx 135,000 files to be updated or 2.4 MB... ] > wrote 539699 bytes read 17803469 bytes 11046.77 bytes/sec > total size is 1137025227 speedup is 61.99 > Wed Nov 28 10:28:55 EST 2001 > > # syncronization of 722,941 files (13MB) in bib.list from the same directory > > > date ; rsync-2.3.2 -avvzn --include-from bib.list --exclude '*' rsync://adsfore.harvard.edu/test/. . ; date > Wed Nov 28 10:53:03 EST 2001 > sending exclude list at Wed Nov 28 11:56:22 2001 > done sending exclude list at Wed Nov...

...nt:349) Saving memory pages: iter 2 2: sent 6720, skipped 1496, delta 24388ms, dom0 13%, target 5%, sent 9Mb/s, dirtied 2Mb/s 1841 pages [2008-06-11 12:24:30 3983] INFO (XendCheckpoint:349) Saving memory pages: iter 3 3: sent 1130, skipped 711, delta 4029ms, dom0 27%, target 4%, sent 9Mb/s, dirtied 13Mb/s 1703 pages [2008-06-11 12:24:34 3983] INFO (XendCheckpoint:349) Saving memory pages: iter 4 4: sent 1125, skipped 578, delta 4085ms, dom0 9%, target 5%, sent 9Mb/s, dirtied 12Mb/s 1520 pages [2008-06-11 12:24:38 3983] INFO (XendCheckpoint:349) Saving memory pages: iter 5 5: sent 1039, skipped 481...

...next). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. > You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares > using 2x1GB > and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 > I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. > Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). > Using NFS (3) we see up to 120MB/s (GB). How can we improve the speed ? > How can we find the bottle neck ? (I tested already various samba > versions (4.4{5,6}) without > any success.

...is attached using 8G HBA. > >You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares > >using 2x1GB > >and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With > >samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. > >Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). > >Using NFS (3) we see up to 120MB/s (GB). How can we improve the speed ? > >How can we find the bottle neck ? (I tested already various samba > >versions (4.4{5,6}) without > >any success. Doesn't sound like a copy issue, more a raw read/write one.

...the io request stradles a page boundary. This is more serious for random io than sequential, but both are effected. To give an example, my NFS storage with write-back cache was only able to do 1MB/s (4k direct io 4 outstanding) on a non-aligned partition, on an aligned partition I was able to get 13MB/s with the same workload. That's 13x improvement. For Linux you can use fdisk/sfdisk to start your first partition on sector 64 instead of the default 63. On Windows use diskpart to create a partition that is aligned on a given offset. -Ross

Anyone had disconnect problems with WK2 boxs and samba servers ? Any fix ?

Samba and Win2k just don't seem to want to work together. I get disconnects after about 13MB of data transfer, and the Win2k box just loses the share as if it were disconnected. Re-establishing the share works, but data transfer of large files or working with large amounts of data is impossible. From the amount of traffic on this newsgroup regarding WinXP and Win2K problems with Samba, I...