Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "13862".
Did you mean:
1362
2009 Jun 25
0
Error creating vm xen3.4
Hi all, when i try to create a new virtual machine in a new instalation of
xen3.4 ( compiled from source) i get this error:
xm create windows2.hvm
Using config file "./windows2.hvm".
Error: Domain ''y'' does not exist.
And this is the log:
[2009-06-25 17:59:42 13862] TRACE (XendDomainInfo:291) domain_getinfo(2)
failed, ignoring: (3, ''No such process'')
[2009-06-25 17:59:42 13862] TRACE (XendDomainInfo:291) domain_getinfo(2)
failed, ignoring: (3, ''No such process'')
[2009-06-25 17:59:42 13862] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2198) Destro...
2015 Aug 26
3
FW: Questions about Samba 4
...k short version :
Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind: rpcbind terminating on signal. Restart with "rpcbind -w"
Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind[16334]: Stopping rpcbind daemon....
Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind[16339]: Starting rpcbind daemon....
Aug 7 08:49:16 rtd-print1 winbindd[13862]: STATUS=daemon 'winbindd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections===============================================================
Aug 7 08:49:16 rtd-print1 winbindd[13862]: [2015/08/07 08:49:16.367256, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:73(fault_report)
Aug 7 08:49:16 rtd-print1 winbin...
2015 Aug 26
0
FW: Questions about Samba 4
...t;Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind: rpcbind terminating on
>signal. Restart with "rpcbind -w"
>Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind[16334]: Stopping rpcbind daemon....
>Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind[16339]: Starting rpcbind daemon....
>Aug 7 08:49:16 rtd-print1 winbindd[13862]: STATUS=daemon
>'winbindd' finished starting up and ready to serve
>connections====================================================
>===========
>Aug 7 08:49:16 rtd-print1 winbindd[13862]: [2015/08/07
>08:49:16.367256, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:73(fault_report)
>Aug...
2015 Aug 25
3
Questions about Samba 4
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:36:14AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
> On 2015-08-24 20:55, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
> > winbindd is extremely reliable and fully supported by the Samba
> > Team, please don't post FUD about Samba components. If you have
> > winbindd problems, post bug reports
>
> I did,
2004 Oct 20
1
Unable to compile dovecot with Solaris 9 and Forte C
Just a "heads up".
I tried to search mailinglist archives and wiki, but found no similar
configurations.
Dovecot is unbuildable with the following configuration:
SunOS mail 5.9 Generic_112233-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210
cc: Forte Developer 7 C 5.4 2002/03/09
config.log output from ./configure is at:
http://iso.ego.fi/misc/dovecot_1.0-test50.log
I guess I'll have to bend
2019 May 01
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.7 Available for Download
...6: smb2_sesssetup: Avoid STATUS_PENDING responses for session
setup.
* BUG 13816: dbcheck in the middle of the tombstone garbage collection causes
replication failures.
* BUG 13818: ndr_spoolss_buf: Fix out of scope use of stack variable in
NDR_SPOOLSS_PUSH_ENUM_OUT().
* BUG 13862: vfs_default: Fix vfswrap_offload_write_send()
NT_STATUS_INVALID_VIEW_SIZE check.
* BUG 13863: smb2_server: Grant all 8192 credits to clients.
o Noel Power <noel.power at suse.com>
* python/samba: extra ndr_unpack needs bytes function
o Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com>...
2019 May 22
0
[Announce] Samba 4.10.4 Available for Download
...ion
setup.
* BUG 13698: smb2_tcon: Avoid STATUS_PENDING completely on tdis.
* BUG 13796: smb2_sesssetup: avoid STATUS_PENDING responses for session
setup.
* BUG 13843: dbcheck: Fix the err_empty_attribute() check.
* BUG 13858: vfs_snapper: Drop unneeded fstat handler.
* BUG 13862: vfs_default: Fix vfswrap_offload_write_send()
NT_STATUS_INVALID_VIEW_SIZE check.
* BUG 13863: smb2_server: Grant all 8192 credits to clients.
* BUG 13919: smbd: Implement SMB_FILE_NORMALIZED_NAME_INFORMATION handling.
o Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com>
* BUG 13872: s3/vfs_gl...
2019 May 01
0
[Announce] Samba 4.9.7 Available for Download
...6: smb2_sesssetup: Avoid STATUS_PENDING responses for session
setup.
* BUG 13816: dbcheck in the middle of the tombstone garbage collection causes
replication failures.
* BUG 13818: ndr_spoolss_buf: Fix out of scope use of stack variable in
NDR_SPOOLSS_PUSH_ENUM_OUT().
* BUG 13862: vfs_default: Fix vfswrap_offload_write_send()
NT_STATUS_INVALID_VIEW_SIZE check.
* BUG 13863: smb2_server: Grant all 8192 credits to clients.
o Noel Power <noel.power at suse.com>
* python/samba: extra ndr_unpack needs bytes function
o Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com>...
2019 May 22
0
[Announce] Samba 4.10.4 Available for Download
...ion
setup.
* BUG 13698: smb2_tcon: Avoid STATUS_PENDING completely on tdis.
* BUG 13796: smb2_sesssetup: avoid STATUS_PENDING responses for session
setup.
* BUG 13843: dbcheck: Fix the err_empty_attribute() check.
* BUG 13858: vfs_snapper: Drop unneeded fstat handler.
* BUG 13862: vfs_default: Fix vfswrap_offload_write_send()
NT_STATUS_INVALID_VIEW_SIZE check.
* BUG 13863: smb2_server: Grant all 8192 credits to clients.
* BUG 13919: smbd: Implement SMB_FILE_NORMALIZED_NAME_INFORMATION handling.
o Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com>
* BUG 13872: s3/vfs_gl...
2013 Jul 19
3
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
...wrote:
> Oh, excellent point, I agree. My bad. Now that I'm not assuming those
> are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there are three
> fptoui's and there are 3 call instances.
>
> (Changing subject line again.)
>
> Now it looks like it's bug #13862
>
> On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>
> I think those calls correspond to this
>
> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>
> The calls are followed by an imul with 12 which matches up with what
> occurs right after the fptoui in the IR.
>
>
> On Thu, Ju...
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
...lent point, I agree. My bad. Now that I'm not assuming those
>> are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there are three
>> fptoui's and there are 3 call instances.
>>
>> (Changing subject line again.)
>>
>> Now it looks like it's bug #13862
>>
>> On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>>
>> I think those calls correspond to this
>>
>> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>>
>> The calls are followed by an imul with 12 which matches up with what
>> occurs right after the fptoui...
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Oh, excellent point, I agree. My bad. Now that I'm not assuming those
are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there are three
fptoui's and there are 3 call instances.
(Changing subject line again.)
Now it looks like it's bug #13862
On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
> I think those calls correspond to this
>
> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>
> The calls are followed by an imul with 12 which matches up with what
> occurs right after the fptoui in the IR.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1...
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
...bad. Now that I'm not assuming those
>>> are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there are three
>>> fptoui's and there are 3 call instances.
>>>
>>> (Changing subject line again.)
>>>
>>> Now it looks like it's bug #13862
>>>
>>> On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>>>
>>> I think those calls correspond to this
>>>
>>> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>>>
>>> The calls are followed by an imul with 12 which matches up with what
>>...
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
...h, excellent point, I agree. My bad. Now that I'm not assuming
> those are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there
> are three fptoui's and there are 3 call instances.
>
> (Changing subject line again.)
>
> Now it looks like it's bug #13862
>
> On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>> I think those calls correspond to this
>>
>> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>>
>> The calls are followed by an imul with 12 which matches up with
>> what occurs right after the fptoui...
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
...>> assuming those are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the
>> output. Also there are three fptoui's and there are 3 call
>> instances.
>>
>> (Changing subject line again.)
>>
>> Now it looks like it's bug #13862
>>
>> On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>>> I think those calls correspond to this
>>>
>>> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>>>
>>> The calls are followed by an imul with 12 which matches up
>>...
2013 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
...sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the
>>> output. Also there are three fptoui's and there are 3
>>> call instances.
>>>
>>> (Changing subject line again.)
>>>
>>> Now it looks like it's bug #13862
>>>
>>> On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>>>> I think those calls correspond to this
>>>>
>>>> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
>>>>
>>>> The calls are followed...
2013 Jul 19
4
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
Hmm, I'm not able to get those .ll files to compile if I disable SSE and I
end up with SSE instructions(including sqrtpd) if I don't disable it.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote:
> Is there something specifically required to enable SSE? If it's not
> detected as available (based from the target triple?) then I don't think