search for: 1380587

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 18:15, David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Simon Moll <moll at cs.uni-saarland.de> writes: > > > You are referring to the sub-vector sizes, if i am understanding > > correctly. I'd assume that the mask sub-vector length always has to be > > either 1 or the same as the data sub-vector length. For example,

...mask works, then <4 x float> fadd with > a <1 x i1> mask, a <8 x float> fadd with a <2 x i1> mask, etc. should also > be possible overloads of the same intrinsic. > > Yep. Doing the same for standard vector IR is on the radar: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504#1380587. > > > So far, so good. A bit odd, when I think about it, but if hardware out > there has that capability, maybe this is a good way to encode it in IR > (other options might work too, though). The crux, however, is the > interaction with the dynamic vector length: is it in terms o...