search for: 137577

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "137577".

Did you mean: 137557
2012 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] Access Violation using ExecutionEngine on 64-bit Windows 8 Consumer Preview
Viktor, could you try my patch? I guess they are __chkstk. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120220/137577.html ...Takumi
2012 Mar 02
3
[LLVMdev] Access Violation using ExecutionEngine on 64-bit Windows 8 Consumer Preview
Hi everyone! I've faced a strange problem after updating to Windows 8 Consumer Preview recently. It seems that LLVM inserts 4 calls to the same function at the start of generated code. The function's disassembly (taken from nearby computer with Windows 7) is: 00000000773A0DD0 sub rsp,10h 00000000773A0DD4 mov qword ptr [rsp],r10 00000000773A0DD8 mov qword ptr
2008 Apr 01
1
v1.1.rc4 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc4.tar.gz.sig I didn't have time/energy to fix everything I wanted, so it'll probably be a few more RCs left until v1.1.0. This is anyway an important release, because it fixes two buffer overflows in search code which have been in all v1.1 releases (but not v1.0). Really stupid
2012 Mar 02
2
[LLVMdev] Access Violation using ExecutionEngine on 64-bit Windows 8 Consumer Preview
...allocating and protecting memory for generated native functions? Best regards, Victor Milovanov. 2012/3/2 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: > Viktor, could you try my patch? I guess they are __chkstk. > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120220/137577.html > > ...Takumi