search for: 137,6

...115,6 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work) list_del_init(&pkt->list); spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); - virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); - reply = pkt->reply; sg_init_one(&hdr, &pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr)); @@ -137,6 +135,11 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work) break; } + /* Deliver to monitoring devices all correctly transmitted + * packets. + */ + virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); + if (reply) { struct virtqueue *rx_vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]; int v...

...115,6 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work) list_del_init(&pkt->list); spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock); - virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); - reply = pkt->reply; sg_init_one(&hdr, &pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr)); @@ -137,6 +135,11 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work) break; } + /* Deliver to monitoring devices all correctly transmitted + * packets. + */ + virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); + if (reply) { struct virtqueue *rx_vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]; int v...

...; --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct virtrng_info { > unsigned int data_avail; > int index; > bool busy; > + bool hwrng_register_done; > }; > > static bool probe_done; > @@ -136,15 +137,6 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev) > return err; > } > > - err = hwrng_register(&vi->hwrng); > - if (err) { > - vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > - vi->vq = NULL; > - kfree(vi); > - ida_simple_remove(&rng_index_ida, index)...

...; --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct virtrng_info { > unsigned int data_avail; > int index; > bool busy; > + bool hwrng_register_done; > }; > > static bool probe_done; > @@ -136,15 +137,6 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev) > return err; > } > > - err = hwrng_register(&vi->hwrng); > - if (err) { > - vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > - vi->vq = NULL; > - kfree(vi); > - ida_simple_remove(&rng_index_ida, index)...

...itoring devices. > > > > This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery > > to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued in the > > s/,// > > > virqueue. > > s/virqueue/virtqueue/ > Thanks, I'll fix in the v2! > > @@ -137,6 +135,11 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work) > > break; > > } > > > > + /* Deliver to monitoring devices all correctly transmitted > > + * packets. > > + */ > > + virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); > > + &gt...

...itoring devices. > > > > This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery > > to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued in the > > s/,// > > > virqueue. > > s/virqueue/virtqueue/ > Thanks, I'll fix in the v2! > > @@ -137,6 +135,11 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work) > > break; > > } > > > > + /* Deliver to monitoring devices all correctly transmitted > > + * packets. > > + */ > > + virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt); > > + &gt...

...us in the future (ambisonics, for example), this option will make it possible to use them. --- src/opusenc.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/opusenc.c b/src/opusenc.c index 0f83194..f2c7c48 100644 --- a/src/opusenc.c +++ b/src/opusenc.c @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ void usage(void) printf(" --framesize n Maximum frame size in milliseconds\n"); printf(" (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, default: 20)\n"); printf(" --expect-loss Percentage packet loss to expect (default: 0)\n"); + printf(&...

...@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) > per_cpu(irq_name, cpu) = NULL; > } > > - Spurious change. > /* > * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us > * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do > @@ -137,6 +136,8 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) > pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock); > pv_lock_ops.wait = xen_qlock_wait; > pv_lock_ops.kick = xen_qlock_kick; > + > + pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted = xen_vcpu_stolen; > } > > /...

...@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) > per_cpu(irq_name, cpu) = NULL; > } > > - Spurious change. > /* > * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us > * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do > @@ -137,6 +136,8 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) > pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock); > pv_lock_ops.wait = xen_qlock_wait; > pv_lock_ops.kick = xen_qlock_kick; > + > + pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted = xen_vcpu_stolen; > } > > /...

...ore unregistering a virtio-rng device. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org --- drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c index 0027137..416b15c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static void remove_common(struct virtio_device *vdev) struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv; vdev->config->reset(vdev); + complete(&vi->have_data); vi->b...

...ore unregistering a virtio-rng device. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org --- drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c index 0027137..416b15c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static void remove_common(struct virtio_device *vdev) struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv; vdev->config->reset(vdev); + complete(&vi->have_data); vi->b...

RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121540 When we try to hot-unplugging a busy virtio-rng device, the device can't be removed. And the reading process in guest gets stuck. Those two patches fixed this issue by completing have_data completion and preventing invalid reading. Thanks for the help of Amit. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org V2: reset data_avail (Amit) adjust

RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121540 When we try to hot-unplugging a busy virtio-rng device, the device can't be removed. And the reading process in guest gets stuck. Those two patches fixed this issue by completing have_data completion and preventing invalid reading. Thanks for the help of Amit. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org V2: reset data_avail (Amit) adjust

...-78,6 +78,7 @@ static pcre *re_opensuse_version; static pcre *re_sles_version; static pcre *re_sles_patchlevel; static pcre *re_minix; +static pcre *re_hurd_dev; static void compile_regexps (void) __attribute__((constructor)); static void free_regexps (void) __attribute__((destructor)); @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ compile_regexps (void) COMPILE (re_sles_version, "^VERSION = (\\d+)", 0); COMPILE (re_sles_patchlevel, "^PATCHLEVEL = (\\d+)", 0); COMPILE (re_minix, "^(\\d+)\\.(\\d+)(\\.(\\d+))?", 0); + COMPILE (re_hurd_dev, "^/dev/(h)d(\\d+)s(\\d+)$",...

...m_vcpu.msr_tsc_adjust = 0; + paging_update_paging_modes(v); v->arch.flags |= TF_kernel_mode; diff -r d5c677159abb xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vcpu.h --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vcpu.h Thu Sep 20 21:50:56 2012 +0800 +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vcpu.h Thu Sep 20 23:34:04 2012 +0800 @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct hvm_vcpu_asid n1asid; u32 msr_tsc_aux; + u64 msr_tsc_adjust; /* VPMU */ struct vpmu_struct vpmu; diff -r d5c677159abb xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h Thu Sep 20 21:50:56 2012 +0800 +...

...tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl Wed May 30 17:48:38 2012 +0800 @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ libxl_vga_interface_type = Enumeration(" libxl_vga_interface_type = Enumeration("vga_interface_type", [ (0, "DEFAULT"), (1, "STD"), + (2, "QXL"), ]) # @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ libxl_vga_interface_info = Struct("vga_i libxl_vga_interface_info = Struct("vga_interface_info", [ ("type", libxl_vga_interface_type), ("vramkb", MemKB), + ("ramkb", MemKB), ]) libxl_vnc_info = Struct("vnc_info&...

I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree Amit already backported two patches for 3.16-stable, then cherry-pick of my

I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree Amit already backported two patches for 3.16-stable, then cherry-pick of my

v2: - this now separates both the patches; the virtio-rng fix is self-contained - re-work hwrng core to fetch randomness at device init time if ->init() is registered by the device, instead of not calling it at all. - virtio-rng: introduce a probe_done bool to ensure we don't ask host for data before successful probe Hi, When booting a recent kernel under KVM with the virtio-rng

v2: - this now separates both the patches; the virtio-rng fix is self-contained - re-work hwrng core to fetch randomness at device init time if ->init() is registered by the device, instead of not calling it at all. - virtio-rng: introduce a probe_done bool to ensure we don't ask host for data before successful probe Hi, When booting a recent kernel under KVM with the virtio-rng