Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1350mib".
Did you mean:
1350mb
2008 Oct 07
1
[LLVMdev] why doesn't LLVM link its dependencies dynamically?
...e change in a library is
10 s for static linking and 7.3 s for dynamic linking (building in Eclipse
is slower).
One advantage of static linking I haven't thought about is that only the
needed functions need to be loaded, unlike everything for dynamic libraries.
The space saving is huge though: 1350MiB vs 723MiB and the IO load is
probably greatly reduced.
I've added a hackish script that patches LLVM 2.3 to use dynamic libraries
if anyone wants it. Just run it after configuring.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at me.com>wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2008,...
2008 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] why doesn't LLVM link its dependencies dynamically?
On Oct 6, 2008, at 15:52, Yale Zhang wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm mainly build the debug versions of lli and opt
> which are huge and take up to 10 seconds to build. It seems there is
> no option in configure to allow dynamic linking. Before I try to add
> it myself, is there a reason why it's not done?
In addition to the APIs being insufficiently stable for shared
2008 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] why doesn't LLVM link its dependencies dynamically?
Hi everyone. I'm mainly build the debug versions of lli and opt which are
huge and take up to 10 seconds to build. It seems there is no option in
configure to allow dynamic linking. Before I try to add it myself, is there
a reason why it's not done?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Yale Zhang <yzhang1985 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know if LLVM will soon have a dynamic