Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "133e352".
Did you mean:
13335
2019 May 17
0
[nbdkit PATCH 3/3] filters: Use only .thread_model, not THREAD_MODEL
...ers/fua/fua.c
index 120ff0a..9d0e561 100644
--- a/filters/fua/fua.c
+++ b/filters/fua/fua.c
@@ -41,8 +41,6 @@
#include <nbdkit-filter.h>
-#define THREAD_MODEL NBDKIT_THREAD_MODEL_PARALLEL
-
static enum FuaMode {
NONE,
EMULATE,
diff --git a/filters/log/log.c b/filters/log/log.c
index 133e352..9c0f35c 100644
--- a/filters/log/log.c
+++ b/filters/log/log.c
@@ -47,8 +47,6 @@
#include "cleanup.h"
-#define THREAD_MODEL NBDKIT_THREAD_MODEL_PARALLEL
-
static uint64_t connections;
static char *logfilename;
static FILE *logfile;
diff --git a/filters/nocache/nocache.c b/filters/n...
2019 May 17
4
[nbdkit PATCH 0/3] Add noparallel filter
Being able to programmatically force nbdkit to be less parallel can be
useful during testing. I was less sure about patch 3, but if you like
it, I'm inclined to instead squash it into patch 1. This patch is
written to apply after my NBD_CMD_CACHE work (since I touched the
nocache filter); but can be rearranged if we think this series should
go in first while that one undergoes any adjustments
2019 May 16
27
[nbdkit PATCH v2 00/24] implement NBD_CMD_CACHE
Since v1:
- rework .can_cache to be tri-state, with default of no advertisement
(ripple effect through other patches)
- add a lot more patches in order to round out filter support
And in the meantime, Rich pushed NBD_CMD_CACHE support into libnbd, so
in theory we now have a way to test cache commands through the entire
stack.
Eric Blake (24):
server: Internal hooks for implementing