search for: 132mb

...samba-problem. When copying myriads of small file from a client to the server or vice versa I get bad performance: 1000 files a 16kb: ~80seconds = 200kb/second But this is highspeed compared to copying from nt to nt: 1000 files a 16kb: ~18 minutes (sic!!) = 14kb/second !! When copying big files (132MB) I get better performance (~3MB/sec, which still could be much better). I know this is some kind of question: 'my car dont work. why ?', but maybe someone could give me some hint to hunt this problem down. If the clients (all clones) are the problem, why is server->nt and nt->server...

Hi there, Just gave 0.13 a spin against XFS (both with default mkfs options) on my SATA tower and was impressed by how much performance has improved since last time I played with it (v0.5)! It pretty much matched XFS for I/O performance and had much better file creation/deletion performance. http://www.csamuel.org/2008/03/23/btrfs-013-and-xfs-benchmarks cheers, Chris -- Chris Samuel :

On 11/15/20 1:29 PM, John Fawcett wrote: >> atm, listening on localhost, with Dovecot -> Tika direct, no proxy. >> >> similarly fragile under load. throwing ~10 messages with .5-5MB attachments at it at once causes all sorts of complaints. frequently, like this Nov 15 15:59:40 test.loc tika[35696]: INFO tika/ (message/rfc822) Nov 15 15:59:41 test.loc tika[35696]: WARN

Adam, With the blog entry[1] you''ve made about gzip for ZFS, it raises a couple of questions... 1) It would appear that a ZFS filesystem can support files of varying compression algorithm. If a file is compressed using method A but method B is now active, if I truncate the file and rewrite it, is A or B used? 2) The question of whether or not to use bzip2 was raised in the

I am [trying to] perform a test prior to moving my data to solaris and zfs. Things are going very poorly. Please suggest what I might do to understand what is going on, report a meaningful bug report, fix it, whatever! Both to learn what the compression could be, and to induce a heavy load to expose issues, I am running with compress=gzip-9. I have two machines, both identical 800MHz P3 with