search for: 1320k

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "1320k".

Did you mean: 1320
2011 Feb 22
0
Problem with xapi and stunnel on XenServer 5.6.1
...em please mail me. That is my secondary server top : top - 11:51:48 up 1:26, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 Tasks: 127 total, 1 running, 125 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 4.2%us, 5.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 86.5%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 3.7%st Mem: 314368k total, 306676k used, 7692k free, 1320k buffers Swap: 524280k total, 6252k used, 518028k free, 109556k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 23343 root 20 0 194m 9272 3236 S 37.5 2.9 29:17.48 xapi 23570 root 20 0 5908 2696 1792 S 9.6 0.9 7:31.16 stunnel thanks in advance Asen -- View this message in context: ht...
2006 Apr 23
1
fsck_ufs locked in snaplk
Colleagues, one of my servers had to be rebooted uncleanly and then I have backgrounded fsck locked for more than an our in snaplk: 742 root 1 -4 4 1320K 688K snaplk 0:02 0.00% fsck_ufs File system in question is 200G gmirror on SATA. Usually making a snapshot (e.g., for making dumps) consumes 3-4 minutes for that fs, so it seems to me that filesystem is in a deadlock. Any hints? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM50...
2006 May 22
0
smbd process grows to 25Mb resident size
...ery similar ping times from a given client and are spread across our network as the clients are.) Thanks, Duncan > 26029: /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D > 00010000 2832K r-x-- /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd > 002E2000 48K rwx-- /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd > 002EE000 1320K rwx-- [ heap ] > FD080000 1224K rw-s- dev:32,0 ino:301936 > FD200000 1736K rw-s- dev:32,0 ino:301937 > FD400000 20288K rw-s- dev:32,0 ino:301938 > FE900000 168K rw-s- dev:32,0 ino:301940 > FE930000 24K r-x-- /lib/nss_nis.so.1 > FE946000 8K rwx-- /li...
2011 Apr 01
15
btrfs balancing start - and stop?
Hi, My company is testing btrfs (kernel 2.6.38) on a slave MySQL database server with a 195Gb filesystem (of which about 123Gb is used). So far, we''re quite impressed with the performance. Our database loads are high, and if filesystem performance wasn''t good, MySQL replication wouldn''t be able to keep up and the slave latency would begin to climb. This though, is