search for: 13124

After a yum update (yesterday), I am now unable to install any rpm package. An example of the error message is duplicated below: %pre(VMwareWorkstation-5.0.0-13124.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping VMwareWorkstation-5.0.0-13124 Could anyone help? Thanks in advance.

After some head scratching and debugging it turns out that disabling shared libs fixes the problem. This might be related to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13124 . It would be nice to get this finally fixed otherwise cmake + shared libs is no go. Thanks. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi, > > I am building llvm 3.3 with cmake on PPC64 and have a bunch of regression > test failures. With on...

I have an Ubuntu 14.04 member server which runs winbind, krb5, and samba. Without encryption, I am able to use winbind to get all the info I neeed. i.e. winbind -g works winbind -u works I am trying to now get LDAPS working, but when I run a command nothing happens winbind -g does nothing (no errors) winbind -u does nothing (no errors). On the Windows DC, I can see TLS traffic happening

...0 S 0 0.0 0:00.06 events/2 13 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.03 events/3 14 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper 15 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread And there are a dozen of smbd4wins when I do a ps -A 13124 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13125 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13126 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13127 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13128 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13129 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13130 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13131 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins 13132 ? 00:00:00 smbd4wins...

...53 0.00170 0.950 0.957 3 14668 302 0.934 0.00200 0.930 0.938 4 14282 296 0.914 0.00226 0.910 0.919 5 13896 281 0.896 0.00247 0.891 0.901 6 13510 264 0.878 0.00264 0.873 0.883 7 13124 251 0.861 0.00280 0.856 0.867 8 12738 232 0.846 0.00293 0.840 0.852 9 12352 216 0.831 0.00305 0.825 0.837 10 11966 206 0.817 0.00315 0.811 0.823 11 11580 190 0.803 0.00325 0.797...

...l) > Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED > Registering messaging pointer for type 1 - private_data=(nil) > Registering messaging pointer for type 5 - private_data=(nil) > Registering messaging pointer for type 51 - private_data=(nil) > messaging_init_internal: my id: 13124 > lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters > Freeing parametrics: > Initialising global parameters > rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit > (16384) INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 10 > tdb: 10 > printdrivers: 10 > lanman: 10 > smb: 10...

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I was just investigating the winbind execution issue : > > > This is what happens when winbind is started by samba > > > > [root at dmzrodc ~]# winbindd -D --option=server role check:inhibit=yes > --foreground -S -d 10 Error setting option

...e LDAPS via Winbind & Samba currently that would increase security? On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Björn JACKE <bj at sernet.de> wrote: > On 2018-01-09 at 11:08 -0800 Timothy Gwynne via samba sent off: > > ... > > according to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13124#c5 ldap ssl > ads > does not work reliably anymore, you might try the mentioned "client ldap > sasl > wrapping = plain" setting. You will make the setup not more secure in the > end > though. But the ldap ssl ads parameter might soon go away anyway. > > Björn >...

...uld be > used and the > CA should be trusted. Thank you for clarifying this. Hmm. this is one I set based on samba's adviced install. Please note, from years a go.. !samba 4.1-4.2 or so. Later on in 4.5 i used it most probely to avoid bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13124 And yes, this is a bit of a risk. But if i ask who did configure a CA for there Samba AD-DC's, I expect only 20% to say yes. I adviced this because, i did see that he did not configure tls in his config for the DC. So to avoid errors from a "client" perspective on the server and...

hi everyone i am developing http://sprinj.com it uses a login system, quite simple, really, similar to loginEngine the problem is that takes way too much time to access the first page. when i desactive the login system, there is very noticeable difference (about 2 to 3 seconds), and people who visited the website complained about this. is there something i can do to speed the sessions checkups ?

...usershares for an unknown share. o Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> * BUG 14248: samba process does not honor max log size. * BUG 14587: vfs_zfsacl: Add missing inherited flag on hidden "magic" everyone@ ACE. o Isaac Boukris <iboukris at gmail.com> * BUG 13124: s3-libads: Pass timeout to open_socket_out in ms. o G?nther Deschner <gd at samba.org> * BUG 14486: s3-vfs_glusterfs: Always disable write-behind translator. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 14517: smbclient: Fix recursive mget. * BUG 14581: clitar: Use do_list()&...

...usershares for an unknown share. o Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> * BUG 14248: samba process does not honor max log size. * BUG 14587: vfs_zfsacl: Add missing inherited flag on hidden "magic" everyone@ ACE. o Isaac Boukris <iboukris at gmail.com> * BUG 13124: s3-libads: Pass timeout to open_socket_out in ms. o G?nther Deschner <gd at samba.org> * BUG 14486: s3-vfs_glusterfs: Always disable write-behind translator. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 14517: smbclient: Fix recursive mget. * BUG 14581: clitar: Use do_list()&...

...ype 12 - private_data=(nil) Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED Registering messaging pointer for type 1 - private_data=(nil) Registering messaging pointer for type 5 - private_data=(nil) Registering messaging pointer for type 51 - private_data=(nil) messaging_init_internal: my id: 13124 lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters Freeing parametrics: Initialising global parameters rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb:...

...l) > Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED > Registering messaging pointer for type 1 - private_data=(nil) > Registering messaging pointer for type 5 - private_data=(nil) > Registering messaging pointer for type 51 - private_data=(nil) > messaging_init_internal: my id: 13124 > lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters > Freeing parametrics: > Initialising global parameters > rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit > (16384) INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 10 > tdb: 10 > printdrivers: 10 > lanman: 10 > smb: 10...

...0 0 0 112 9432 7156 1879476 0 0 3664 0 2275 2862 0 3 81 17 0 0 1 112 9212 7172 1879588 0 0 2196 32 2132 2293 0 2 66 32 0 1 0 112 9848 7180 1878864 0 0 1268 4168 1852 1934 0 2 84 14 0 0 7 112 11208 7180 1876936 0 0 92 13124 1339 355 0 2 50 48 0 0 0 112 10708 7188 1877512 0 0 628 16 1552 1014 0 1 84 16 0 0 1 112 10344 7188 1878044 0 0 472 0 1334 721 0 1 89 10 0 0 1 112 10372 7196 1878136 0 0 1936 32 2268 2850 0 2 50 48 0 0 0 112 10336 7192 1...

Hello, I have installed libguestfs on RHEL 5.5 64 bit. 3 packages i have installed. libguestfs-tools-c-1.9.10-1.1 libguestfs-tools-1.9.10-1.1 libguestfs-1.9.10-1.1 When i am trying to run virt-resize it gives me error: virt-resize -expand /dev/sda1 vm01.scilab vm01.scilab-15GB -d libguestfs: trace: add_drive_opts "vm01.scilab" "readonly:true" libguestfs: trace:

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...11885 11892 11985 11988 11992 12143 12154 12182 12183 12185 12198 12287 12329 12330 12334 12338 12345 12387 12391 12393 12394 12443 12502 12586 12589 12590 12645 12652 12653 12654 12656 12701 12702 12709 12711 12718 12719 12720 12722 12745 12790 12795 12837 12847 12914 12915 13098 13099 13108 13111 13124 13131 13132 13146 13157 13159 13160 13161 13170 13175 13176 13181 13258 13264 13265 13271 13277 13290 13291 13410 13431 13432 13454 13455 13456 13458 13459 13469 13478 13548 13549 13550 13557 13558 13567 13570 13590 13591 13594 13664 13679 13683 13684 13685 13686 13714 13715 13718 13735 13766 13788...

Hi, On checking it further. I observe below message from net ads command. LDAP] TLS: hostname (*X.X.X.X*) does not match common name in certificate ( win.cifs.com). [LDAP] ldap_err2string Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Connect error I am able to fetch data successfully from ldapsearch command. It seems samba is connecting to ldap with IP but in client certificate domain name is

Hai, I re-checked your config that looks all good, few minor things. Now, i noticed this in Andrews comment. Quote: The problem here is that Samba's python libraries are trying to find the DNS record they just added over RPC, but can't using LDAP. They do this to fix the ownership of the records, as otherwise they will be owed by the administrator, not the DC. What is in