Displaying 20 results from an estimated 32 matches for "13.20".
Did you mean:
1.20
2006 Aug 25
2
yum update failed
I am getting the following error on yum update.
What do I do??? I have the ATI display driver package installed.
---------------------------------------------
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error: file /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 from install
of xorg-x11-Mesa -libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37 conflicts with file from
package fglrx64_6_8_0-8.16.20-1
file
2006 Nov 01
1
yum "transaction check error"
I need help resolving a "transaction check error" when trying to 'yum install
gtk2-devel' on a CentOS 4.2 x86_64 system. I have a feeling this is due to
having both x86_64 and i386 libs?
# yum list installed xorg-x11-libs
Installed Packages
xorg-x11-libs.x86_64 6.8.2-1.EL.13.20 installed
xorg-x11-libs.i386 6.8.2-1.EL.13.20
2005 Oct 21
2
corrupt rpm problem
Here is the output from yum -y upgrade without the error parts...
Its odd because it updated all of these first time round. I have dared
reboot the box yet, for fear it won't come back up...
Setting up Upgrade Process
Setting up Repos
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
--->
2013 Apr 10
6
means in tables
Hi.
I have 2 tables, with same dimensions (8000 x 5). Something like:
tab1:
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5
14.23 1.71 2.43 15.6 127
13.20 1.78 2.14 11.2 100
13.16 2.36 2.67 18.6 101
14.37 1.95 2.50 16.8 113
13.24 2.59 2.87 21.0 118
tab2:
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5
1.23 1.1 2.3 1.6 17
1.20 1.8 2.4 1.2 10
1.16 2.6 2.7 1.6 11
1.37 1.5 2.0 1.8 13
1.24 2.9 2.7 2.0 18
I need generate a table of averages, the
2005 Apr 11
0
plotting Principle components vs individual variables.
Dear R,
I'm trying to plot the first principle component of an analysis vs the first
variable but am having trouble. I have no trouble doing the initial plot
but have difficulty thereafter.
First I want to highlight some points of the following data set
list(running)
[[1]]
X100m X200m X400m X800m X1500m X5K X10K Marathon
Argentina 10.39 20.81 46.84 1.81
2005 Apr 11
1
plotting Principal components vs individual variables.
At the cost of breaking the thread I'm going to change your subject and
replace 'Principle' by 'Principal'. I just can't stand it any longer...
OK, here is how I would solve your other problems. First put
> wh <- c("USA", "New Zealand", "Dominican Republic",
"Western Samoa", "Cook Islands")
> ind
2008 Sep 04
1
Some issues with UPS Forza SL-1001
Hi to everybody. Some days ago, I bought an UPS by Forza Power Technologies,
model SL-1001. This Forza SL-1001 is line-interactive, has 14,4 A/h charge
and is rated at 1000VA. Before, I had a TrippLite Omni 500 (or something
like that), a simple contact-closure UPS, and I used nut with the simple
genericupsdriver, so I'm new with this type of UPSs.
NUT doesn't list Forza as a
2004 Aug 21
3
Puzzled at lm() and time-series
I tried toy problems and there doesn't seem to be a basic problem
between lm() and ts objects:
X = data.frame(x=c(1,2,7,9), y=c(7,2,3,1))
lm(y ~ x, X)
X <- lapply(X, function(x) ts(x, frequency=12, start=c(1994,7)))
lm(y ~ x, X)
and this works fine - whether you do an lm() before or after making ts
objects, it's okay.
But I have a situation where things aren't okay.
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > Ralf, et al.,
> > >
> > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> >
2019 Jul 19
4
index worker 2.3.7 undefined symbol errors
Suddenly I am getting undefined symbol errors having updated to 2.3.7.
Jul 18 01:02:49 localhost dovecot: indexer-worker: Error: User <someone>
lookup failed: Couldn't load required plugin
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib95_imap_sieve_plugin.so: dlopen() failed:
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib95_imap_sieve_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
command_hook_register
(I think I fixed this one by a
2019 Jul 22
0
index worker 2.3.7 undefined symbol errors
On 19 Jul 2019, at 13.20, Dirk Koopman via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
> But I am left with this:
>
> Jul 19 14:09:52 localhost dovecot: indexer-worker: Error: User <someone> lookup failed: Couldn't load required plugin /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib90_sieve_plugin.so: dlopen() faile: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib90_sieve_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
2005 Nov 04
2
installing kde using up2date
Hi,
I have already installed 4.2 on my laptop, I only chose GNOME at install
time.
I now need to use up2date to install kde (I wish to install twinkle
softphone).
What is the correct way to do that.
I did:
up2date kde*
up2date -u kde*
up2date -i kde*
It printed a listing of the packages but did not install them.
Thanks,
Jerry
2012 Jun 04
2
Frequently login problem
Hi,
I am using dovecot 2.1.3 on centos 5.7. It was working fine but last few
days I need to restart or reload dovecot service because at that time users
are not able to login.
Each time I am getting information from doveco.log is as :
Jun 04 11:52:54 auth: Error: BUG: Authentication client gave a PID 17564 of
existing connection
Jun 04 11:52:54 auth: Error: BUG: Authentication client gave a PID
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > Ralf, et al.,
> >
> > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> > additional benchmark results.
> >
> > First, these are preliminary
2003 Dec 02
2
: GLIM PROBLEMS
Hi all
I have another GLIM question.
I have been using R as well as Genstat (version 6) in order to fit
GLIM models to the data (displayed below).
The same models are fitted but the answers supplied by the two
packages are not the same.
Why? Can anyone help?
A discription of the data and the type of model/s fitted can be found
below.
Regards
Allan
The
2004 Feb 13
3
Calculate Closest 5 Cases?
I've only begun investigating R as a substitute for SPSS.
I have a need to identify for each CASE the closest (or most similar) 5
other CASES (not including itself as it is automatically the closest). I
have a fairly large matrix (50000 cases by 50 vars). In SPSS, I can use Correlate > Distances to generate a matrix of similarity, but only on a small sample. The entire matrix can not
2024 Nov 16
1
Interpreting data from 220V input APC UPS
Following up on this, I've figured out what's going on. What I'm not
sure of is how best to address the situation. I'd like to avoid going
down to the MIB level because I just don't understand it.
"Split phase" output devices seem to fall into an undefined area.
They're not three phase, but require additional MIB values so APC uses
their 3-phase MIB
2009 Jan 15
2
zfs drive keeps failing between export and import
I have a zpool that consists for a two-drive mirror. The two times I
took the zpool offline, I had to resilver one of the drives (the same
drive both times) when I imported it back. All drives in the pool
show no read, write, or checksum errors and are new, so I'm looking to
a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli
devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB
2018 Nov 28
2
[2.3.4] Segmentation faults
See https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps
Without a backtrace it's not really possible to figure out where it's crashing.
> On 28 Nov 2018, at 13.20, Joan Moreau <jom at grosjo.net> wrote:
>
> Where to get that ?
>
>
> On 2018-11-27 08:50, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>> It's still missing core dump (or bt full from it)
>>
>> Aki
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Ralf, et al.,
>
> Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> additional benchmark results.
>
> First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
> necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the