search for: 12ms

$ uname -R 6.5 6.5.19m $ cc -v MIPSpro Compilers: Version 7.4 $ sshd -p 8022 [client]$ ssh -p 8022 -v [host] $ par -s -SS -i -p [pid] ... 12mS sshd(3664039): fork() 12mS sshd(3664039): END-fork() = 3639808 12mS sshd(3639808): END-fork() = 0 13mS sshd(3639808): close(5) OK 13mS sshd(3639808): getuid() = 0, euid=0 14mS sshd(3639808): stat("/etc/passwd&quot...

...d packages on both machines were identical as well. After doing the initial configuration of lmbench3 I ran a script doing 10 times a "make rerun". All results seem to be OK somehow. But I cannot explain why Xen is faster than the native installation when creating and deleting files? Its 12ms (DomU) against 24ms (native) for creating a 0K file and 50ms (DomU) against 60ms (native) for creating a 10K file. Please find all the results attached. Is there any way this is possible? Maybe the communication methods used by the shared device drivers make the virtual machine think the operation...

...d packages on both machines were identical as well. After doing the initial configuration of lmbench3 I ran a script doing 10 times a "make rerun". All results seem to be OK somehow. But I cannot explain why Xen is faster than the native installation when creating and deleting files? Its 12ms (DomU) against 24ms (native) for creating a 0K file and 50ms (DomU) against 60ms (native) for creating a 10K file. Please find all the results attached. Is there any way this is possible? Maybe the communication methods used by the shared device drivers make the virtual machine think the operation...

...) to extension '31705680837' rejected because extension not found in context '[0705680837]'. [Sep 10 10:39:03] NOTICE[835] chan_sip.c: Peer '0705680837' is now Lagged. (2022ms / 2000ms) [Sep 10 10:39:13] NOTICE[835] chan_sip.c: Peer '0705680837' is now Reachable. (12ms / 2000ms) [Sep 10 13:09:54] NOTICE[835][C-0000002c] chan_sip.c: Call from '77707057984' (185.29.203.27:5060) to extension '31705680837' rejected because extension not found in context '[0705680837]'. [Sep 10 13:16:17] NOTICE[835][C-0000002d] chan_sip.c: Call from '777...

...e filter Exist fragment? views/127.0.0.1:10100/activity/list (0.1ms) Read fragment views/127.0.0.1:10100/activity/list (0.1ms) Rendered activity/_recent.html.erb (1.3ms) Rendered activity/_switch.html.erb (2.4ms) Rendered activity/list.html.erb within layouts/application (7.7ms) Completed 200 OK in 12ms (Views: 8.3ms | ActiveRecord: 106.9ms) It looks like the Rails app receives the request as soon as curl sends it. It process it in 12 or 19 milliseconds and then curl doesn''t get the response for another 3 full seconds. What could possibly be causing the delay between the time that the v...

Hi, Whenever one of my trunks becomes unreachable or reachable again.. On logs i got the msg as follows: Jul 31 15:15:51] NOTICE[15112] chan_sip.c: Peer 'voiptrunk' is now Reachable. (12ms / 2000ms) [Jul 31 15:15:51] WARNING[15112] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: Failed to query database. Check debug for more info. I dont wanna turn on the debug function because theres a lot of traffic goin on on this server and i dont wanna increase i/o load on it anymore.. And i cant just tu...

...ower devices information server ???? Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/nut-server.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) ???? Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2024-03-27 10:28:00 CET; 16s ago ??? Process: 10715 ExecStart=/sbin/upsd (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) ??????? CPU: 12ms mars 27 10:28:00 nicolas-MS-7B19 upsd[10715]: not listening on 192.168.0.49 port 3493 mars 27 10:28:00 nicolas-MS-7B19 upsd[10715]: listening on 127.0.0.1 port 3493 mars 27 10:28:00 nicolas-MS-7B19 upsd[10715]: no listening interface available mars 27 10:28:00 nicolas-MS-7B19 upsd[10715]: not l...

I am measuring the performance of one TCP connection over two symmetric paths. Packets are sent to two paths alternatively. I found that when the latency of each path are within 1ms, the overall TCP throughput is the *sum* of the throughput of the two paths. However, when the latency of the two paths increases to 5ms, the overal TCP throughput drops to the throughput of a *single* path. Has anyone

...============================================= > ^* 85.199.214.102 1 6 377 42 -357us[ -354us] > +/- 7721us ^+ server1.quickdrivingtest> 1 6 377 41 > -617us[ -617us] +/- 6199us ^+ time.netweaver.uk 2 6 > 377 41 +323us[ +323us] +/- 12ms > > Both DCs are configured to use the same servers (0.uk.pool.ntp.org, > 1.uk.pool.ntp.org and 2.uk.pool.ntp.org) > > > > > Add : winbind refresh tickets = yes to you smb.conf > > Done. > > > > > If these are member servers, make sure you have on...

...============================================================= ^* 85.199.214.102 1 6 377 42 -357us[ -354us] +/- 7721us ^+ server1.quickdrivingtest> 1 6 377 41 -617us[ -617us] +/- 6199us ^+ time.netweaver.uk 2 6 377 41 +323us[ +323us] +/- 12ms Both DCs are configured to use the same servers (0.uk.pool.ntp.org, 1.uk.pool.ntp.org and 2.uk.pool.ntp.org) > > Add : winbind refresh tickets = yes to you smb.conf Done. > > If these are member servers, make sure you have only the server lines pointed > to you AD DC's. &g...

...gt; > because extension not found in context '[0705680837]'. > > [Sep 10 10:39:03] NOTICE[835] chan_sip.c: Peer '0705680837' is now > > Lagged. (2022ms / 2000ms) > > [Sep 10 10:39:13] NOTICE[835] chan_sip.c: Peer '0705680837' is now > > Reachable. (12ms / 2000ms) > > [Sep 10 13:09:54] NOTICE[835][C-0000002c] chan_sip.c: Call from > > '77707057984' (185.29.203.27:5060) to extension '31705680837' rejected > > because extension not found in context '[0705680837]'. > > [Sep 10 13:16:17] NOTICE[835][C-000...

...205: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=56 Reply from 202.203.204.205: bytes=32 time=651ms TTL=56 ------- when xlite can register ---------------- Pinging my.sipserver.com [202.203.204.205] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.203.204.205: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=56 Reply from 202.203.204.205: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=56 Reply from 202.203.204.205: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=56 even if the latency is high i still have internet access as i can still browse and using yahoo messenger. anyone encountered something similar? regards, nhadie

Would you bother to setup a fastcgi for a "intranet accessible" application that is like to get < 100 hits a day? David

Hi all some how I'm getting confused: it seems I clobbered incoming calls from my sip provider. I can not imagine that my upgrade from 15.3 to 15.5 could be related I'm certain that dialling my own number, results in reaching asterisk, from my tcpdump. And on the asterisk console I get: pbx*CLI> == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 > 0x7f49ac54c040 -- Strict RTP learning after

Ok, I built a test system to duplicate my problem and provide myself a platform that I can mess around with to try and break any features. My problem is G729 pass-through from a gateway to a phone. I think I even have transcoding working, which makes me more confused on what's wrong with my pass-through. It must be a configuration issue. The basics... *CLI> core show version Asterisk

I have a computer I am using to host a virtual machine. Centos 6, for both, 64 bit. The host machine's network connection seems fine. No problems. Trying to access the virtual machine is usually fine. but then, poof, ssh, http, ftp, all lose connection for about a minute. Then they come back up. I looked in all the logs on both machines, could find nothing, but not sure where to look. My

I''ve just started creating a web application with approx. 100 tables. Possibly more. Oracle is the DB. There exists a legacy schema I that i will use some of. So far i have created a small bit of the app, approx 10 tables. Im using webrick on my local machine. The Oracle DB is on its own server. My boss has noticed that its not really that zippy, there is a small delay between

...gh boxes have normally about 5ms latency. When running nft (regardless command for listing set with few items or with several thousand items) latencies go up to 30-100ms. This is observed when router throughput is from 600Mbps to 2Gbps. When throughput is about 300Mbps, latecies go up too, but to 8-12ms. Routers are using multiple NICs queues with affinity to CPU cores, maximum load when tests were performed was about 10-20%. Userspace processes (including nft) are affined to other cores than NICs queues. Older boxes with iptables but similar ruleset have no such behaviour. Running "iptable...

I''m trying to time a function within Firefoxwith a pid$target probe [2]. e.g dtrace -Zqw -x dynvarsize=64m -x evaltime=preinit -p 13954 -s menu- construct.d -s sigcont.d elapsed: 12.7942481ms cpu : 7.7911194ms count : 40 times I''m also measuring Firefox startup time by running it arguments like this: ... file:///Users/joelr/work/mozilla/startup/startup.html#`python

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:59:08 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:30:48 +0100 > Roy Eastwood via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Thanks Rowland. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of > > > Rowland