search for: 12b

...[0B,48r:0)[352r,416r:5)... R3 = [0B,48r:0)[368r,416r:5)... R4 = [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... I schedule the following instruction (48B): 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vre...

...= [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... > R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... > > I schedule the following instruction (48B): > > 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry > Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 > 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 > 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 &...

..... R3 = [0B,48r:0)[368r,416r:5)... R4 = [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... I schedule the following instruction (48B): 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg...

...of /tmp/foo, then sue has write access IF /tmp/foo is group writeable. Thanks in advance. Samba set up quickly and seems to work great, except for this little bit of strangeness. -Jim ---------------------------------------------------- James E. Sullivan | Northrop Grumman IT Building 12B | on site at: NIH/CIT/DCSS/SOSB Room 2N207 | Phone:301-451-6372 Bethesda, MD 20892 | Email:sullivan@mail.nih.gov -----------------------------------------------------

...8r,416r:5)... > R4 = [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... > R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... > > I schedule the following instruction (48B): > > 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry > Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 > 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 > 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TF...

..... R3 = [0B,48r:0)[368r,416r:5)... R4 = [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... I schedule the following instruction (48B): 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg...

...rname of "DOMAIN\cstankevitz" and a password that matches the password stored on a Microsoft Windows AD Server. 12. Does the use case above require someone to run kinit on the samba server before the client attempts a connection? If yes: 12a. Will the ticket supplied by kinit expire? 12b. Does kinit need to be run periodically? e.g. when the ticket expires or when the computer reboots? 12c. Which username should I provide to kinit for this use case? Should it have any particular privilege? 12d. If kinit has not been properly run, what specifically will fail and what specifically...

..... >> R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... >> >> I schedule the following instruction (48B): >> >> 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry >> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 >> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 >> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; >> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 >> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] >> IntRegs:%vreg31 >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs...

On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > I've described that issue (see below) when you were out of town... I think > I am getting more context on it. Please take a look... > > So, in short, when the new MI scheduler performs move of an instruction, it > does something like this: > > // Move the instruction to its new

...hows >> that we have 3.5M entries in the `DebugLoc` side-vectors for 7M line >> table entries. The cost of these is ~180B each, for another >> ~600MB. >> >> If we integrate a side-table of `MDLineTable`s into its uniquing, >> the overhead is only ~12B / line table entry, or ~80MB. This saves >> 520MB. >> >> This is somewhat perpendicular to redesigning the metadata format, >> but IMO it's worth doing as soon as it's possible. >> >> 4. Create `GenericDebugMDNode`, a transitional subclass of `M...

...ewrite `DebugLoc` lookup tables. My profiling shows that we have 3.5M entries in the `DebugLoc` side-vectors for 7M line table entries. The cost of these is ~180B each, for another ~600MB. If we integrate a side-table of `MDLineTable`s into its uniquing, the overhead is only ~12B / line table entry, or ~80MB. This saves 520MB. This is somewhat perpendicular to redesigning the metadata format, but IMO it's worth doing as soon as it's possible. 4. Create `GenericDebugMDNode`, a transitional subclass of `MDUser` through an intermediate class `DebugM...

...6r:4)... > >> > >> I schedule the following instruction (48B): > >> > >> 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry > >> Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 > >> 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 > >> 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > >> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > >> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > >> IntRegs:%vreg31 > >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0&...

Robert Dal Santo wrote: > Is there any work underway to get Samba to support OPLOCKS? I know > they are difficult to implement but I'm faced with a decisions now to buy an > NT box (Ugh!) or do a lot of messing around to get this application > to perform decently. The application in questions takes around 5 > hours to do a taks without OPLOCKS and around an hour to do the

...njaro Linux, 6.3.5  Y me he dado cuenta que no existe la opción de crear un Nuevo conjunto de datos. ¿eso es así ahora? Muchas gracias por su tiempo. Saludos. -- Ps. Félix Pérez Villoria Centro Kumon & Ayudantía Pedagógica. https://www.ayudantiapedagogica.cl General Ordóñez 30 oficina 11B-12B, Maipú, Santiago, Chile Móvil: 56 9 9672 2896 Móvil: 56 9 6213 2492 Oficina: 56 2 2893 4345

...handling instead of the one build into tinc. Bug or feature? "old" ifconfig and route commands are used instead of iproute commands. Bug or feature? regards, -- Mads Kiilerich Sys.Adm. Cand.Polyt Mads@Kiilerich.com Tel. +45 38 16 26 00 Mob. +45 26 20 07 73 M?ntmestervej 12B 1th, DK-2400 NV, Denmark "To be, or not to be; that is the question." Shakespeare "The question is minus one using 2's complement!" Me --- TINC development list, tinc-devel@nl.linux.org Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/tinc-devel/

...= [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... > R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)... > > I schedule the following instruction (48B): > > 0B BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry > Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %D1 %D2 > 8B %vreg27<def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 > 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 &...

...A NA ... $ 05B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.64 2.48 1.87 ... $ 07A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 07B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 10A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 10B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 12A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 12B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 14A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 14B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 16A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 16B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 17A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 17B: num NA NA NA NA...

...0, 0, 0, 0) sig_fault+4(a, 0, ffbff4d8, 1, 7ffffc00, 2b7008) libc.so.1`__sighndlr+0xc(a, 0, ffbff4d8, 1b59fc, 0, 1) libc.so.1`call_user_handler+0x3b8(a, 200, 4, 0, fee52000, ffbff4d8) process_oplock_break_message+0x564(bbe, 33e430, 3464c4, 3068c8, ffbff888, bbe) message_dispatch+0x184(0, 3e8, ea60, 12b, 0, 2e7400) receive_message_or_smb+0x64(346d88, 20041, ea60, 20441, 0, 4104) smbd_process+0x110(bba, 55534, 2, 265400, 2cc400, 18) main+0x8e4(0, ffbffc2c, ffbffc38, 2fb864, fee50200, fee50240) _start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > ::quit

...; _______________________________________________ > R-help-es mailing list > R-help-es en r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help-es -- Ps. Félix Pérez Villoria Centro Kumon & Ayudantía Pedagógica. https://www.ayudantiapedagogica.cl General Ordóñez 30 oficina 11B-12B, Maipú, Santiago, Chile Móvil: 56 9 9672 2896 Móvil: 56 9 6213 2492 Oficina: 56 2 2893 4345 ------------ próxima parte ------------ Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20230601/b9365c97/attachment.html> ------------ próxima...

Hello Mads, In case you never saw any mail from me, I'm tinc's co-author. It would be helpful if you'd subscribe to the tinc developpers mailing list. It's not high volume, but it eases communication. There's a problem with tinc's boot scripts (at least the debian one, but that's fixed now). The netmask of the tap devices should be larger than the one specified with