search for: 129854

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "129854".

2019 Feb 07
9
RFC: changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
...nge the rule for variable names from UpperCamelCase to lowerCamelCase. Just to get wider visibility on this, I'm raising this again as an RFC, as suggested by Roman Lebedev. My original post from last week is here and gives a rationale: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/129854.html. There seemed to be general agreement that the status quo is not ideal. Chris Lattner pointed out that this came up in 2014 as well: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/077685.html I've created a patch to implement the change. Review and comments welcome: https://revi...
2019 Feb 12
2
changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
...melCase to lowerCamelCase. > > > > Just to get wider visibility on this, I'm raising this again as an RFC, as suggested by Roman Lebedev. > > > > My original post from last week is here and gives a rationale: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/129854.html. There seemed to be general agreement that the status quo is not ideal. > > > > Chris Lattner pointed out that this came up in 2014 as well: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/077685.html > > > > I've created a patch to implement the chang...
2019 Feb 12
2
changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
...t;> >>> Just to get wider visibility on this, I'm raising this again as an RFC, as suggested by Roman Lebedev. >>> >>> >>> >>> My original post from last week is here and gives a rationale: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/129854.html. There seemed to be general agreement that the status quo is not ideal. >>> >>> >>> >>> Chris Lattner pointed out that this came up in 2014 as well: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/077685.html>> >>> >>> &gt...
2019 Feb 13
4
changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase
...this, I'm raising this again as an >> RFC, as suggested by Roman Lebedev. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> My original post from last week is here and gives a rationale: >> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/129854.html. >> There seemed to be general agreement that the status quo is not ideal. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Chris Lattner pointed out that this came up in 2014 as well: >> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/0...