search for: 127282

Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) Hi Sergio, I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 might be needed: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). Regards, Vincent On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 06:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto via samba wro...

On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 > > ? > > Hi Sergio, > that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls- >

...uhti 2019, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > > Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) > > > > Hi Sergio, > > I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 > > might be needed: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html > > > > I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC > > with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). > > Actually, you need Andreas, not me. ;) > > Andreas is working on crypto unification and mo...

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 11:12 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) > > Hi Sergio, > I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 > might be needed: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html > > I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC > with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). For builds with the (recommended) internal Heimdal Kerberos we do not require GnuTLS 3.4 because we have a fallback imple...