search for: 1270,7

Where are the patches mentioned in the bug report comments? The specific one I'm refering to is http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15323#c12. The comment mentions that it's attached, but I can't seem to access the attachment.

Hi: This series try to prvernt a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Jason Wang (4): vhost: introduce vhost_exceeds_weight() vhost_net: fix possible

...- session.c 26 Jun 2002 13:51:06 -0000 1.208 +++ session.c 29 Jun 2002 03:19:42 -0000 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include "canohost.h" #include "session.h" #include "monitor_wrap.h" +#include "auth-sia.h" #ifdef HAVE_CYGWIN #include <windows.h> @@ -1269,7 +1270,7 @@ */ if (!options.use_login) { #ifdef HAVE_OSF_SIA - session_setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty); + PRIVSEP(setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty)); if (!check_quietlogin(s, command)) do_motd(); #else /* HAVE_OSF_SIA */

...- session.c 26 Jun 2002 13:51:06 -0000 1.208 +++ session.c 28 Jun 2002 20:29:24 -0000 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include "canohost.h" #include "session.h" #include "monitor_wrap.h" +#include "auth-sia.h" #ifdef HAVE_CYGWIN #include <windows.h> @@ -1269,7 +1270,7 @@ */ if (!options.use_login) { #ifdef HAVE_OSF_SIA - session_setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty); + PRIVSEP(setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty)); if (!check_quietlogin(s, command)) do_motd(); #else /* HAVE_OSF_SIA */

...sion.c Wed Jun 26 09:51:06 2002 +++ openssh-3.4p1+/session.c Sun Jul 21 23:26:49 2002 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include "canohost.h" #include "session.h" #include "monitor_wrap.h" +#include "auth-sia.h" #ifdef HAVE_CYGWIN #include <windows.h> @@ -1269,7 +1270,7 @@ */ if (!options.use_login) { #ifdef HAVE_OSF_SIA - session_setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty); + PRIVSEP(setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty)); if (!check_quietlogin(s, command)) do_motd(); #else /* HAVE_OSF_SIA */

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

...+1257,7 @@ krb5_free_context(context); #endif -#ifdef AFS +#if defined(AFS) && defined(KRB4) /* Try Kerberos v4 TGT passing if the server supports it. */ if ((supported_authentications & (1 << SSH_PASS_KERBEROS_TGT)) && options.kerberos_tgt_passing) { @@ -1270,7 +1272,7 @@ log("WARNING: Encryption is disabled! Token will be transmitted in the clear!"); send_afs_tokens(); } -#endif /* AFS */ +#endif /* AFS && KRB4 */ return; /* need statement after label */ } --- sshd.c 2002/01/23 10:41:05 1.1 +++ sshd.c 2002/01/23 12:12:42...

...sion.c Wed Jun 26 09:51:06 2002 +++ openssh-3.4p1+/session.c Sun Jul 21 23:26:49 2002 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include "canohost.h" #include "session.h" #include "monitor_wrap.h" +#include "auth-sia.h" #ifdef HAVE_CYGWIN #include <windows.h> @@ -1269,7 +1270,7 @@ */ if (!options.use_login) { #ifdef HAVE_OSF_SIA - session_setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty); + PRIVSEP(setup_sia(pw->pw_name, s->ttyfd == -1 ? NULL : s->tty)); if (!check_quietlogin(s, command)) do_motd(); #else /* HAVE_OSF_SIA */

...atic void __devinit start_secondary(vo smp_callin(); while (!cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), smp_commenced_mask)) rep_nop(); - setup_secondary_APIC_clock(); + mach_setup_secondary_local_clock(); if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) { disable_8259A_irq(0); enable_NMI_through_LVT0(NULL); @@ -1270,7 +1271,7 @@ static void __init smp_boot_cpus(unsigne smpboot_setup_io_apic(); - setup_boot_APIC_clock(); + mach_setup_boot_local_clock(); /* * Synchronize the TSC with the AP Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6/arch/i386/kernel/time.c ==============================================================...

...atic void __devinit start_secondary(vo smp_callin(); while (!cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), smp_commenced_mask)) rep_nop(); - setup_secondary_APIC_clock(); + mach_setup_secondary_local_clock(); if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) { disable_8259A_irq(0); enable_NMI_through_LVT0(NULL); @@ -1270,7 +1271,7 @@ static void __init smp_boot_cpus(unsigne smpboot_setup_io_apic(); - setup_boot_APIC_clock(); + mach_setup_boot_local_clock(); /* * Synchronize the TSC with the AP Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6/arch/i386/kernel/time.c ==============================================================...

...t;SSL_CTX_new() failed"); - xnames = ssl_proxy_ctx_init(ssl_ctx, ssl_set, ctx->verify_client_cert); + ssl_proxy_ctx_init(ssl_ctx, ssl_set); if (SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ssl_ctx, ctx->cipher_list) != 1) { i_fatal("Can't set cipher list to '%s': %s", @@ -1303,7 +1270,7 @@ ssl_proxy_ctx_use_key(ctx->ctx, ssl_set); if (ctx->verify_client_cert) - ssl_proxy_ctx_verify_client(ctx->ctx, xnames); + ssl_proxy_ctx_verify_client(ctx->ctx); hash_table_insert(ssl_servers, ctx, ctx); return ctx; @@ -1343,12 +1310,10 @@ ssl_proxy_init_client(const...

Hi all: This series is an update version (hope the final version) of multiqueue (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) support in virtio-net driver. All previous comments were addressed, the work were based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Performance test show the aggregate latency were increased greately but may get some regression

Hi all: This series is an update version (hope the final version) of multiqueue (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) support in virtio-net driver. All previous comments were addressed, the work were based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Performance test show the aggregate latency were increased greately but may get some regression

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.h index 6e399aa..4cefce3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.h @@ -107,7 +107,4

This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP), INTn instruction emulation. Introduce new function vmx_inject_sw_exception() which deliver the software excetion, software interrupt and privileged software exception. Split hardware exception as a seperate function(old function vmx_inject_hw_exception()). Also Passed down intruction length

..._dp_update_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, @@ -1259,7 +1506,7 @@ static void drm_dp_update_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, dowork = true; } - drm_dp_put_port(port); + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); if (dowork) queue_work(system_long_wq, &mstb->mgr->work); @@ -1270,7 +1517,7 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_ { struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb; struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; - int i; + int i, ret; /* find the port by iterating down */ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); @@ -1295,7 +1542,9 @@ static struct dr...

...t; @@ -1259,7 +1506,7 @@ static void drm_dp_update_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, > dowork = true; > } > > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > if (dowork) > queue_work(system_long_wq, &mstb->mgr->work); > > @@ -1270,7 +1517,7 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_ > { > struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb; > struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; > - int i; > + int i, ret; > /* find the port by iterating down */ > > mutex_lock(&mgr->lock)...

RFC because this is an API break, but we haven't declared stable API yet. If we like it, I'm working on using libnbd to implement the nbdkit-nbd plugin; knowing whether it is API version 0.1 or 0.2 will be useful. I also dabbled with allowing optional parameters in python, although my OCaml is weak enough that there may be cleaner ways to approach that. Eric Blake (4): api: Add flags

...t; > > dowork = true; > > > } > > > > > > - drm_dp_put_port(port); > > > + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > > > if (dowork) > > > queue_work(system_long_wq, &mstb->mgr->work); > > > > > > @@ -1270,7 +1517,7 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch > > > *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_ > > > { > > > struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb; > > > struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; > > > - int i; > > > + int i, ret; > > > /* fin...