search for: 125mb

...Xeon on an Intel Board with 16GB ram running Opensuse 13.1 with all updates. Samba is 4.1.6. smb.conf doesn't have anything special in it, haven't played around with the socket options. The server is a Xen host, samba is running on the host, not the guest. Writes to server are quick, 125MB/sec. Reads are slow, sometimes starting at 11MB/sec, but I have found a strange way of making them go faster. On the server over ssh, I open a 'vim'. I then hit Ctrl-C to get the escape prompt from vim and the read speed instantly doubles, hit it again, the speed maxes out at 85MB/sec....

...idea to solve this issue? > dim(dados) [1] 40000 10 > sink("d:/points.dta") > split(data, list(data$Easting,data$Northing,data$Depth,data$Media,data$Type), drop=T) Error: cannot allocate vector of size 1334208 Kb In addition: Warning messages: 1: Reached total allocation of 125Mb: see help(memory.size) 2: Reached total allocation of 125Mb: see help(memory.size) Best Regards, __________________________________________________________ Eng. Agr., M.Sc. Eduardo Dutra de Armas __________________________________________________________ Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultur...

...the new virt-manager there cannot be installed due to depency issues) to experiment with KVM which works so far but gives me weird results. Doing a "hdparm -t" on the host system consistently gives me a result of about 70MB/sec yet in a KVM guest I get results ranging from 40MB/sec to 125MB/sec on each run. Also the Centos kernel does not support the virtio drivers needed for KVM paravirtualization so I'm wondering how fast hardware assisted block-io under KVM is compared to the performance of the paravirtualized Xen driver and to vmware esx based guests. Are there any curren...

...-file sum2 lengths. It remains two bytes until the file is 8193 blocks at which it increments and continues incrementing each time the block count quadruples. This builds on the dynamic block size code (which is consolidated as well) so that the point where we go to a 3 byte sum2 is approximately 125MB. Specifying a fixed block size on the command-line will have an effect on the heuristic i present here. Here is a quick table showing the file sizes at which transition occurs, the sum2 length and the jump in size of the block sum table transmitted: filesize sum2len transition <125MB 2...

Hi R-users, I was trying to do CART using the tree package for a dataset with 6 groups and 1000 predictor variables, number of observations 5000. The following error message is generated Error:cannot allocate vector of size 3910 kb In addition: warning message: Reached total allocation of 125Mb: I am using R 1.3 for Windows 98 in a pII with 128 MBRAM If RAM should be increased what is the ideal system configuration for processing large datasets say more than 500 MB size to perform Multivariate and Exploratory data analysis( I maynot be able to switch to mainframe or supercomputers)...

On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > > The one thing I would point out regarding the above link is that despite > conventional UNIX wisdom, *don't* put /usr on a separate filesystem > in CentOS 7. <sarcasm>Thank you RedHat</sarcasm> > > Flames to /dev/null. Sorry, you don?t get to throw that grenade and then run away. The

Hey, I'm still waiting for the new file server hardware to arrive so I plan to enable user logins in the meantime without profiles and home directories. Reason for this is quite some pressure from people. The setup on the 2 DCs should be done a day or two. Could there be problems if I configure profiles and home directories some weeks after users logged in for the first time? What if e.g.

Hello I have Debian Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 Xen 4.0.1, 2 SAS drives in RAID 1, 16GB ram. I have virtualized Windows 2003R2 32bit where you install the latest version 0.11.0.295 gplpv After reading and reading forums and post testing, I noticed that the hard disk performance drops significantly when I assign the windows domU 9GB ram. (below I leave the config files) If I run the

...ord, size of the disk was never the original motivation for keeping / separate, at least within my memory; it was to minimize the amount of disk space that needed to be fsck'd before bringing the system to single user mode without needing to revert to "rescue media" (at that time, the 125MB tape on which the OS was shipped). Even in the days of SunOS 3 (that's SunOS, not Solaris) I was installing the entire OS on one physical drive, partitioned. Sure, NFS and USENET servers had many drives, but most machines were single drives. Beyond that, I don't really want to get into a...

...ient/smbmount.c:242: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once client/smbmount.c:242: for each function it appears in.) make: *** [client/smbmount.o] Error 1 My system config is: OS Red Hat 6.0/Kernel 2.2.5-15 model_name Intel kernel_arch i686 main_memory 125MB swap 133MB Thanks for any help anyone can provide!

...mputer has to check every file to find changes. About drives, two RAID1 drives has 1x write, 2x read. If your server and or your switch/router have only 100Mbits then is fast enough: 100/8 = 12.5MB/s. A normal drive has about 45-50MB/s and some server drives are even faster. For a Gigabit network (125MB/s) is a bottle neck in write operations, but all users have to write a big file at same time to be a problem. GPO and printers are not a problem, can be configured in any time. Greetings and sorry for my horrible english. 2015-08-31 2:14 GMT+02:00 oeh univie edv lists <edv-lists at oeh.univie...

...ss. Without samba I can download with > 100 kbit/s > > So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is this the maximum > speed with samba? > > I tried a lot of hints for samba tuning but nothing was faster. > 100 kbit/s? as in 12.2KB/s? Ouch. I was able to get 125mB on writes and 119mB reads using a 1gbit ethernet. I start to lose speed on 10gb with limiting factor being cpu on client OR server depending on packet size. Sent a recent note to the cygwin list (used cygwin in the testing). My experience was to use the cifs protocol as easiest (over a local net...

I am using a Samba server on a RedHat 5.2 box this box has no tape drive I would like to back up my network clients to a tape drive on one of the win boxes; Is the following feasible; mount the windows shares using smbmount tar up the dirs/files transfer the tar files onto the win machine Back up using the win machines backup programme If not any other suggestions? Please cc me in reply Regards,

What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share? I have a 100 kbit/s Internet The maximum speed for a download from my  webserver with samba is about 25.000 kbit/s The bottleneck is the samba access.  Without samba  I can download with 100 kbit/s So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is this the maximum speed with samba? I tried a lot of hints for samba tuning but

> Hello Samba Users, > > > > I am using Samba for our project needs to share folders between a Windows > Server 2003 machine and a > > RedHat Linux machine. I am facing issues with Samba shares (Samba Version > 3.5.5 for RHEL 4 x86_64). The scenario is as below ? > > > The windows machine has a couple of shared folders, one of them being * ** > C:\output*

I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this? For example, I plan on doing rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs /targetfs is a NFS mounted filesystem. Any thoughts? TIA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I searched the archives but could not come to a solution. I have to two columns of information t_start_cdt looks like: > t_start_cdt[1:4] [1] "2003-07-09 11:02:25" "2003-07-09 11:10:25" "2003-07-09 11:30:25" [4] "2003-07-09 12:00:25" > class(t_start_cdt) [1] "POSIXt" "POSIXlt" t_end_cdt looks like: > t_end_cdt[1:4]

Hey, I'm using rsync to backup my server but there is a problem because rsync is using very huge amounts traffic. But first to the setup. The server I backup has 4GB of data and I use the following command to backup this data. /usr/bin/rsync -aze 'ssh -i /root/.ssh/backup.key -l backupuser' --rsync-path='sudo rsync' --delete --exclude-from=ex.list $SRC $TRG The problem is

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle...

I tried enabling SMB2 on our network after upgrading to samba 3.6 and experienced the following problems. Commenting out "Max Protocol = SMB2" makes the windows7 and vista clients happy. - [homes] Trying to open a html file in notepad fails on Windows7 Pro SP1. Opening it in Firefox (default browser) or Open Office works ok. - [homes] Mozilla Thunderbird insists on