Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1246229".
Did you mean:
1243229
2019 Aug 09
7
Underscores in package names
Won't it be better to have a convention that allows lowercase, dash,
underscore and dot as only valid characters for new package names and keep
the ancient format validation scheme for older package names?
This could be implemented by a single function, taking a strictNaming_b_1
parameter which defaults to true. Easy to use, and compliance results will
vary according to the parameter value,