Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "124515".
Did you mean:
12451
2011 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
...y and tests as we plan to use it in non-LLVM environments.
>
Hi Kostya,
I haven't had a chance to look at your patch yet, I'm backed up on "big patches". Did you see my review of the safecode patch here?
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110718/124515.html
I expect to have similar concerns and suggestions for your patch,
-Chris
2011 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
...LLVM
> environments.
> >
>
> Hi Kostya,
>
> I haven't had a chance to look at your patch yet, I'm backed up on "big
> patches". Did you see my review of the safecode patch here?
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110718/124515.html
>
> I expect to have similar concerns and suggestions for your patch,
>
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply.
Indeed, some of your comments to safecode patch apply here.
Codingstyle: I'll try to cleanup as much as I can today.
Do you have any lint-like tool that checks for llvm codin...
2011 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
...>
>>
>> Hi Kostya,
>>
>> I haven't had a chance to look at your patch yet, I'm backed up on "big
>> patches". Did you see my review of the safecode patch here?
>>
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110718/124515.html
>>
>> I expect to have similar concerns and suggestions for your patch,
>>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> Indeed, some of your comments to safecode patch apply here.
>
> Codingstyle: I'll try to cleanup as much as I can today.
> Do you h...
2011 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
...gt; Hi Kostya,
>>>
>>> I haven't had a chance to look at your patch yet, I'm backed up on "big
>>> patches". Did you see my review of the safecode patch here?
>>>
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110718/124515.html
>>>
>>> I expect to have similar concerns and suggestions for your patch,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> Indeed, some of your comments to safecode patch apply here.
>>
>> Codingstyle: I'll try to clean...
2011 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
Hi,
What would be our next steps in getting ASan into the LLVM trunk?
I'd like to do it in two steps, first for the LLVM part with minimal tests
and then for the run-time library and all tests.
The current ASan's source repository will probably stay the primary home for
the run-time library and tests as we plan to use it in non-LLVM
environments.
Thanks,
--kcc
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at
2011 Jun 17
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote:
> On 17 June 2011 09:14, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe the fallback code should just use a function call. Much simpler for
>> documentation purposes.
>
>
> Sounds good.
>
I implemented the asm-free way to report warnings as an option to the llvm