Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "1241,13".
Did you mean:
121,13
2018 Sep 06
1
[PATCH net-next 01/11] net: sock: introduce SOCK_XDP
...file *file,
> tun_napi_init(tun, tfile, napi);
> }
>
> + if (rtnl_dereference(tun->xdp_prog))
> + sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_XDP);
> +
> tun_set_real_num_queues(tun);
>
> /* device is allowed to go away first, so no need to hold extra
> @@ -1241,13 +1244,29 @@ static int tun_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct tun_file *tfile;
> struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> + int i;
>
> old_prog = rtnl_...
2018 Sep 06
0
[PATCH net-next 01/11] net: sock: introduce SOCK_XDP
...atic int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
tun_napi_init(tun, tfile, napi);
}
+ if (rtnl_dereference(tun->xdp_prog))
+ sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_XDP);
+
tun_set_real_num_queues(tun);
/* device is allowed to go away first, so no need to hold extra
@@ -1241,13 +1244,29 @@ static int tun_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct tun_file *tfile;
struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
+ int i;
old_prog = rtnl_dereference(tun->xdp_prog);
rcu_ass...
2018 Sep 06
22
[PATCH net-next 00/11] Vhost_net TX batching
Hi all:
This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket
through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by:
1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net
2) Build XDP buff
3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once
through msg_control during sendmsg().
4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed,
or build skb based on XDP
2018 Sep 12
14
[PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching
Hi all:
This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket
through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by:
1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net
2) Build XDP buff
3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once
through msg_control during sendmsg().
4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed,
or build skb based on XDP
2018 Sep 12
14
[PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching
Hi all:
This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket
through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by:
1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net
2) Build XDP buff
3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once
through msg_control during sendmsg().
4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed,
or build skb based on XDP
2014 Dec 31
0
[PATCH 2/2] nvc0: regenerate rnndb headers
...ORNER : NVC0_2D_BLIT_CONTROL_ORIGIN_CENTER;
+ NV50_2D_BLIT_CONTROL_ORIGIN_CORNER : NV50_2D_BLIT_CONTROL_ORIGIN_CENTER;
du_dx = ((int64_t)info->src.box.width << 32) / info->dst.box.width;
dv_dy = ((int64_t)info->src.box.height << 32) / info->dst.box.height;
@@ -1241,13 +1241,13 @@ nvc0_blit_eng2d(struct nvc0_context *nvc0, const struct pipe_blit_info *info)
if (mask != 0xffffffff) {
IMMED_NVC0(push, NVC0_2D(ROP), 0xca); /* DPSDxax */
IMMED_NVC0(push, NVC0_2D(PATTERN_COLOR_FORMAT),
- NVC0_2D_PATTERN_COLOR_FORMAT_32BPP);
-...
2014 Dec 31
2
[PATCH 1/2] nv50: regenerate rnndb headers
The headers hadn't been regenerated in a long time, and there were a few
minor divergences. Among other things, rnndb has changed naming to
G80/etc, for now I've not tackled switching that over and manually
replaced the nvidia codenames back to the chip ids. However no other
modifications of the headergen'd headers was done.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>