search for: 12287

...r Deschner <gd at samba.org> * BUG 12285: "DriverVersion" registry backend parsing incorrect in spoolss. o David Disseldorp <ddiss at samba.org> * BUG 12144: smbd/ioctl: Match WS2016 ReFS get compression behaviour. o Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com> * BUG 12287: CTDB PID file handling is too weak. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 12045: gencache: Bail out of stabilize if we can not get the allrecord lock. * BUG 12283: glusterfs: Avoid tevent_internal.h. * BUG 12374: spoolss: Fix caching of printername->sharename. o Stef...

...r Deschner <gd at samba.org> * BUG 12285: "DriverVersion" registry backend parsing incorrect in spoolss. o David Disseldorp <ddiss at samba.org> * BUG 12144: smbd/ioctl: Match WS2016 ReFS get compression behaviour. o Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com> * BUG 12287: CTDB PID file handling is too weak. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 12045: gencache: Bail out of stabilize if we can not get the allrecord lock. * BUG 12283: glusterfs: Avoid tevent_internal.h. * BUG 12374: spoolss: Fix caching of printername->sharename. o Stef...

...client, because the potentially hostile client could pass back a different number. I could then connect to a port and be fooled into connecting to wrong client. My plan was to get the PID of the sshd process, then use lsof to find what ports it was listening on. The lsof bit works: $ lsof -n -p 12287 -a -i4tcp -a -sTCP:LISTEN COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME sshd 12287 testuser 10u IPv4 10196497 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:54403 (LISTEN) But there seems to be no way to get the PIDs of an ssh process associated with a particular public key, as opposed to a parti...

...gt; * BUG 12144: smbd/ioctl: Match WS2016 ReFS get compression behaviour. o Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com> * BUG 12259: ctdb-protocol: Fix marshalling for GET_DB_SEQNUM control request. * BUG 12275: ctdb-recovery-helper: Add missing initialisation of ban_credits. * BUG 12287: CTDB PID file handling is too weak. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 12045: gencache: Bail out of stabilize if we can not get the allrecord lock. * BUG 12268: smbd: Reset O_NONBLOCK on open files. * BUG 12283: glusterfs: Avoid tevent_internal.h. * BUG 12291: sourc...

...gt; * BUG 12144: smbd/ioctl: Match WS2016 ReFS get compression behaviour. o Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com> * BUG 12259: ctdb-protocol: Fix marshalling for GET_DB_SEQNUM control request. * BUG 12275: ctdb-recovery-helper: Add missing initialisation of ban_credits. * BUG 12287: CTDB PID file handling is too weak. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 12045: gencache: Bail out of stabilize if we can not get the allrecord lock. * BUG 12268: smbd: Reset O_NONBLOCK on open files. * BUG 12283: glusterfs: Avoid tevent_internal.h. * BUG 12291: sourc...

This adds the mdadm-create API for creating RAID devices, and includes various fixes for the other two patches. Rich.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5324 Summary: with option --xattrs the process rsync is more long time Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: fauthier@free.fr

I installed the Eclipse 3.2, Subclipse, and RDT: http://updatesite.rubypeople.org/release and RadRails: http://radrails.sourceforge.net/update. I am getting the "Failed to load JavaHL Library" error message when I go to Preferences -> Team -> SVN tab. This is also happening in standalone RadRails installation. How can I fix this? TIA.

...0001689e]: chan_sip.c:29713 sip_request_call: Conflicting extension values given. Using '823************' and not '01342244560' == Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Called SIP/823*********:5************@78.11.22.33/01342244560 [Nov 21 20:09:01] NOTICE[12287][C-0001689e]: chan_sip.c:22914 handle_response_invite: Failed to authenticate on INVITE to '"Leandro Dardini" <sip:100 at 91.11.22.33>;tag=as1c0d8470' -- SIP/78.11.22.33-000144c3 is circuit-busy == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0) Which is the correct...

...at 11:21:11AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:24:51PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: >> > Btrfs cannot handle having logically non-contiguous requests submitted. For >> > example if you have >> > >> > Logical: [0-4095][HOLE][8192-12287] >> > Physical: [0-4095] [4096-8191] >> > >> > Normally the DIO code would put these into the same BIO''s. The problem is we >> > need to know exactly what offset is associated with what BIO so we can do our >> > checksumming and unlocking...

...????? : 8 max_cpu_id???????????? : 7 nr_nodes?????????????? : 1 cores_per_socket?????? : 4 threads_per_core?????? : 1 cpu_mhz??????????????? : 2000 hw_caps??????????????? : b7ebfbff:0004e33d:20100800:00000001:00000000:00000000:00000000:00000000 virt_caps????????????? : hvm total_memory?????????? : 12287 free_memory??????????? : 6955 sharing_freed_memory?? : 0 sharing_used_memory??? : 0 outstanding_claims???? : 0 free_cpus????????????? : 0 xen_major????????????? : 4 xen_minor????????????? : 8 xen_extra????????????? : .5.86.g8db85532 xen_version??????????? : 4.8.5.86.g8db85532 xen_caps??????????????...

...of many people. See the file AUTHORS in the distribution for the complete list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bugs fixed in 1.2-rc7: 1567 Capella 2002 - welcome-screen doesn't disappear 9216 Gothic 2 won't start - complains about hook process 12287 CommFort: cannot use sound capture 12298 Notation Composer: crashes when opening menus when using ALSA 13743 Checkboxes are drawn as buttons in Voyage Century 14869 Error closing internal windows in Hy-Tek Team Manager 4.0 15471 Adobe Contribute 4 locks up X 15548 Voyage Century Onl...

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...11342 11359 11369 11375 11378 11461 11463 11464 11465 11466 11543 11548 11549 11552 11557 11558 11559 11673 11704 11721 11756 11812 11826 11827 11828 11829 11830 11832 11836 11838 11840 11841 11843 11844 11867 11868 11871 11872 11876 11885 11892 11985 11988 11992 12143 12154 12182 12183 12185 12198 12287 12329 12330 12334 12338 12345 12387 12391 12393 12394 12443 12502 12586 12589 12590 12645 12652 12653 12654 12656 12701 12702 12709 12711 12718 12719 12720 12722 12745 12790 12795 12837 12847 12914 12915 13098 13099 13108 13111 13124 13131 13132 13146 13157 13159 13160 13161 13170 13175 13176 13181...

Hi, I have btrfs volume, shared via samba. I have a directory of documents that I want to backup on my server. win7 reports a maximum of ~3.10MB/s transfer transferring the same directory on a ext4 samba share I get 25MB/s + Any ideas? Is it like that because of how btrfs works and is setup? Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body

...got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 (21, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 (22, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 (24, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 (25, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 (512, 32): FAIL (12287) - test_many_kern ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 (0, 0)[0]: got 0xdeadbeef/-6259853398707798016.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 (1, 0)[0]: got 0xdeadbeef/-6...

...375 11378 11461 11463 11464 > 11465 11466 11543 11548 11549 11552 11557 11558 11559 11673 11704 11721 > 11756 11812 11826 11827 11828 11829 11830 11832 11836 11838 11840 11841 > 11843 11844 11867 11868 11871 11872 11876 11885 11892 11985 11988 11992 > 12143 12154 12182 12183 12185 12198 12287 12329 12330 12334 12338 12345 > 12387 12391 12393 12394 12443 12502 12586 12589 12590 12645 12652 12653 > 12654 12656 12701 12702 12709 12711 12718 12719 12720 12722 12745 12790 > 12795 12837 12847 12914 12915 13098 13099 13108 13111 13124 13131 13132 > 13146 13157 13159 13160 13161 131...

...0 >> (21, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >> (22, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >> (24, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >> (25, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >> (512, 32): FAIL (12287) >> - test_many_kern >> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >> (0, 0)[0]: got 0xdeadbeef/-6259853398707798016.0000...

...expected 0x0/0.000000 > (21, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 > (22, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 > (24, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 > (25, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 > (512, 32): FAIL (12287) > - test_many_kern > ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 > ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 > ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 > ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 > (0, 0)[0]: got 0xdeadbeef/-6259853398707798016.000000, expected > 0x0/0....

...0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >>> (22, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >>> (24, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >>> (25, 0)[0]: got 0x3f800000/1.000000, expected 0x0/0.000000 >>> (512, 32): FAIL (12287) >>> - test_many_kern >>> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >>> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >>> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >>> ERROR: SUSTx not yet supported on < nve4 >>> (0, 0)[0]: got 0xdeadbeef/-...