search for: 12130

Hi Seb, > Already done here : http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12130 that doesn't describe the original issue (second store removed), it is talking about a different issue that appeared at -O1 (and it first seemed to explain your original problem; but now I think the -O1 transform was correct and does not explain your original problem). Ciao, Duncan. > &gt...

Hi, Anyone can tell me what this means? [Feb 3 12:42:32] WARNING[12130]: chan_sip.c:3293 update_call_counter: Inringing for peer 'test-peer' < 0? Regards, Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090203/a39503b7/attachment.htm

Hi Duncan, I included original email in BUG description which described original issue with store being removed. BR Seb 2012/2/29 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Seb, > > > Already done here : http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.**cgi?id=12130<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12130> >> > > that doesn't describe the original issue (second store removed), it is > talking > about a different issue that appeared at -O1 (and it first seemed to > explain > your original problem; but now I think the -O1 tra...

Hi there.. Compiling Asterisk (CVS from 10.05.04) with gcc 3.3.2 works fine. But I have to compile the Kernel with GCC 3.4. Trying to compile Asterisk with gcc 3.4 will result in a compiler-crash. Any idea? Yours, Karl

Already done here : http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12130 Thanks for your answers Best Regards Seb 2012/2/29 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Seb, > > > If I remove datalayout definition, code is not optimized and work as >> expected. >> So my question is: >> >> What attribute/value/interpretation of da...

...lowing data, which represent a monthly consumption of juices: >x<-scan() 1: 2859 3613 3930 5193 4523 3226 4280 3436 3235 3379 3517 6022 13: 4465 4604 5441 6575 6092 6607 6390 6150 6488 5912 6228 10196 25: 7612 7270 8617 9535 8449 8520 9148 8077 7824 7991 7660 12130 37: 9135 9512 9631 12642 11369 12140 13953 12421 11081 46: Read 45 items > arima(x,order=c(2,1,2), seasonal=list(order=c(0,1,0), period=12))->l > acf(l$resid) > sd(l$resid) > Box.test(l$resid) Now, my problem: 1. All the analysis that i have seen regarding ARIMA modeling, had t...

...o_listener replication-notify-fifo { user = dovecot } unix_listener replication-notify { user = dovecot } } service replicator { unix_listener replicator-doveadm { mode = 0600 } } replication_max_conns = 10 service doveadm { inet_listener { port = 12130 ssl = yes } } ssl = required ssl_protocols = SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 ssl_cert = </usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl/cert.crt ssl_key = </usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl/cert.key ssl_client_ca_file = </usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl/ca.pem ssl_client_ca_dir = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl...

Hi Seb, > If I remove datalayout definition, code is not optimized and work as expected. > So my question is: > > What attribute/value/interpretation of data-layout would cause this type of bug? all kinds of optimizers use datalayout (and are disabled if there is none). For example, alias analysis, anything that needs to understand getelementptr offsets, the list is endless. I

...-Mails/dovecot.index: uid_validity updated unexpectedly: 1339019655 -> 1339019656 Jun 6 15:55:24 test-gluster-client1 dovecot: lmtp(11954, testuser192): Error: mdbox /mnt/testuser192/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails: Invalid dbox header size: 0 Jun 6 15:55:24 test-gluster-client1 dovecot: lmtp(12130, testuser128): Error: mdbox /mnt/testuser128/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails: Invalid dbox header size: 0 Jun 6 15:55:27 test-gluster-client1 dovecot: lmtp(12076, testuser217): Error: mdbox /mnt/testuser217/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails: Invalid dbox header size: 0 Jun 6 15:55:27 test-gluster...

Thank you for reply Rowland. Sorry for my typo. I intended to change sm--to-->test but i forget to change other lines. So my original config is below: workgroup = sm > realm = sm.pvt > server string = %h Test Host > security = ads > encrypt passwords = yes > idmap config sm.pvt : backend = ad > idmap config sm.pvt :

...o_listener replication-notify-fifo { user = dovecot } unix_listener replication-notify { user = dovecot } } service replicator { unix_listener replicator-doveadm { mode = 0600 } } replication_max_conns = 10 service doveadm { inet_listener { port = 12130 ssl = yes } } ssl = required ssl_protocols = SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 ssl_cert = </usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl/cert.crt ssl_key = </usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl/cert.key ssl_client_ca_file = </usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl/ca.pem ssl_client_ca_dir = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/ssl...

...n. The winbind 'rid' calculates the ID from the RID and the lower range you set in AD with this calculation: ID = RID - BASE_RID + LOW_RANGE_ID BASE_RID is 0, so it is really: ID = RID + LOW_RANGE_ID So, using your lower range and the RID from above, it becomes ID = 2130 + 10000 ID = 12130 If you use the same smb.conf on all Unix domain members in the domain, you will always get the same Unix ID. Rowland

...ng as fully patched to these issues. Could I please get some feedback from whoever builds out the kernels; if the mitigations/patches are in place in the 4.9.177-35 kernel for the various speculative mitigations? Specifically; CVE-2018-3639, CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3646, CVE-2018-12126, CVE-2018-12130, CVE-2018-12127 and CVE-2019-11091. Many thanks for your response. Regards, Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20190612/d8c2c1b3/attachment-0006.html>

...check for corrupted filesystem and/or file/folders? Any updates done last days? Now maybe, just maybe, and this is a thing i cant check, because if have only AMD cpus in my servers. Source: https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4447 CVE dictionary: CVE-2018-12126, CVE-2018-12127, CVE-2018-12130, CVE-2019-11091 Update for CPU microcode for most types of Intel CPUs. It provides mitigations for the MSBDS, MFBDS, MLPDS and MDSUM hardware vulnerabilities. To fully resolve these vulnerabilities it is also necessary to update the Linux kernel packages as released in DSA 4444. So check if you k...

Hi all, I'm using LLVM 3.0, for which I've filed following bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12130. I'm trying to solve this problem by myself digging into LLVM sources. It seems that problem that I'm experiencing is related to presence or absence of NSW attribute on a 'mul'. Considering following code: define void @t2(double* %x) { L.entry: %a = alloca [2 x i64], align 4 %...

Hi all, I'm using LLVM 3.0, for which I've filed following bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12130. I'm trying to solve this problem by myself digging into LLVM sources. It seems that problem that I'm experiencing is related to presence or absence of NSW attribute on a 'mul'. Considering following code: define void @t2(double* %x) { L.entry: %a = alloca [2 x i64], align 4 %...

Hi all, I'm using LLVM 3.0, for which I've filed following bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12130<https://webmail-eu.st.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=f2882890c0064e71ba4c8238dc7fd399&URL=http%3a%2f%2fllvm.org%2fbugs%2fshow_bug.cgi%3fid%3d12130> . I'm trying to solve this problem by myself digging into LLVM sources. It seems that problem that I'm experiencing is related to presence or a...

Hi, Just get started with Rails and I''m trying to read ahead and find out whether Active Record supports auto-creation of database tables for you? Is this supported, or is the concept that you write your own database DDL to do this? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...D and the lower range > you set in AD with this calculation: > > ID = RID - BASE_RID + LOW_RANGE_ID > > BASE_RID is 0, so it is really: > > ID = RID + LOW_RANGE_ID > > So, using your lower range and the RID from above, it becomes > > ID = 2130 + 10000 > > ID = 12130 > > If you use the same smb.conf on all Unix domain members in the domain, > you will always get the same Unix ID. > > Rowland > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >

Hello, I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, listing all GPOs is working: ------------------ root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} display name : Default Domain Policy path : \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} dn :