search for: 12002

...ftphone to test the service, it seems ok from the softphone point of view (user registred) but when I do a "sip show peers", no one is registered (nor sip show subrscriptions, users...) I put my Asterisk on full debug and I see this trace when trying to register: [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] acl.c: Found IP address for this socket [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] chan_sip.c: Allocating new SIP dialog for OWY3OTAwNzFhNDZhYWU5NTU0YTU1MGY4MzYwOTdlZjQ. - REGISTER (No RTP) [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] chan_sip.c: **** Received REGISTER (2) - Command in SIP REGISTER [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[...

...s ok from > the softphone point of view (user registred) but when I do a > "sip show peers", no one is registered (nor sip show subrscriptions, > users...) > I put my Asterisk on full debug and I see this trace when trying to > register: > > [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] acl.c: Found IP address for this socket > [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] chan_sip.c: Allocating new SIP dialog for > OWY3OTAwNzFhNDZhYWU5NTU0YTU1MGY4MzYwOTdlZjQ. - REGISTER (No RTP) > [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] chan_sip.c: **** Received REGISTER (2) - > Command in SIP REGISTER &g...

...f somebody could elaborate the change in translation of codecs specifically the amount of time increased in Asterisk 11. For example *Asterisk 11* * **alaw **speex * *gsm **15000 **15000 * *ulaw 9150 15000* * * *Asterisk 1.6.x* * **alaw **speex * *gsm **2 12002 * *ulaw 1 12002* I did recalculate the translation for 60 or 1 seconds but nothing changes on Asterisk 11 (VM, Cloud or even physical machine). Is it slin?, adding this overhead or there is something I am overlooking?. * * *Asterisk 11.0.1 => core show translation **(in microseconds)...

Hello list, I am trying to solve a problem and after unsucessfully chasing forums and google for some hours, I turn to you in hope of a solution. I feel it's just a configuration issue but I just can't get my head wrapped around it. The situation is basically this: I have an Asterisk connected to an Alcatel OmniPCX via SIP. Asterisk only ever does SIP and has no dedicated hardware

...in it but comments) Long version: Jun 06 13:11:42 worldsys.gregandeva.net asterisk[1333]: [Jun 6 13:11:42] WARNING[1333]: chan_dahdi.c:4058 dahdi_open: Unable to specify channel 1: Invalid argument Jun 06 13:11:42 worldsys.gregandeva.net asterisk[1333]: [Jun 6 13:11:42] ERROR[1333]: chan_dahdi.c:12002 mkintf: Unable to open channel 1: Invalid argument Jun 06 13:11:42 worldsys.gregandeva.net asterisk[1333]: [Jun 6 13:11:42] ERROR[1333]: chan_dahdi.c:17367 build_channels: Unable to register channel '1' Jun 06 13:11:42 worldsys.gregandeva.net asterisk[1333]: [Jun 6 13:11:42] WARNING[1333]...

So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-cygwin-RA-centos6/builds/12836/steps/configure/logs/stdio http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-s390x-linux1/builds/12002/steps/configure/logs/stdio Should we just upgrade those bots or reduce the requirement to 2.6? On 12 December 2014 at 06:41, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > +1 > > My view on this is that lit is a testing tool. If someone is competent > enough to build LLVM and run the...

Seems like I post about this about once a year, when it's time to upgrade Fedora. I first got this error trying to compile a patched version of dahdi-linux-2.11.1; I noticed that there is now a dahdi-linux-complete-3.0.0+3.0.0, so I tried that one with the same result. If I compile it while running kernel-4.16.8-300.fc28.x86_64, it compiles fine, but when I try to compile it while running

...smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2011/11/10 14:06:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2 [2011/11/10 14:06:07, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2434(init_group_from_ldap) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 12002 [2011/11/10 14:06:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2011/11/10 14:06:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2 [2011/11/10 14:06:07, 3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_...

...ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): >> >> http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-cygwin-RA-centos6/builds/12836/steps/configure/logs/stdio >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-s390x-linux1/builds/12002/steps/configure/logs/stdio >> >> Should we just upgrade those bots or reduce the requirement to 2.6? > > 2.6 + py3k is a generally good combination for typical code and is easy to maintain. It is not possible to be both 2.5 and py3k compatible without huge hurdles. > Well,...

...ler::RoutingError (No route matches "//home/index" with {:method=>:get}): Rendering rescues/layout (not_found) And here is the mongrel log: ** Daemonized, any open files are closed. Look at log/mongrel.pid and log/mongrel.log for info. ** Starting Mongrel listening at 0.0.0.0:12002 ** Starting Rails with development environment... NOTE: Gem.source_index is deprecated, use Specification. It will be removed on or after 2011-11-01. Gem.source_index called from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.14/ lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21. NOTE: Gem::SourceIndex#initialize is deprecate...

Hi, The nouveau driver on my MSI K9N6GM (GeForce 6100 nForce 405) motherboard generates a dot clock speed which is about 8% lower than the value given in xorg.conf. The same happens with the nv driver. The same appears to happen with other motherboards with GeForce 6100 (see Bugzilla ? Bug 12002). I have seen reports of nVidia using the PCIE clock / 4 to drive some of their cards and I noticed that 27000 / 25000 = 1.08. Applying the following patch resolved my problem and now the nouveau driver works fine for me: diff -ur xf86-video-nv-2.1.6/nouveau-20070920/src/nv_setup.c xf86-video-nv-...

Hello, I have a big problem with an application running in production mode : the app crashes but there''s nothing in the logs Setup is Apache + FastCGI - I know there is something wrong with my code somewhere (crash is not related with the setup) How can I do to have further informations about the error while staying in production mode ? Should I run an instance of the application in

Currently lit on windows will not work with python 3 because the internal shell has code like except OSError, e: and in python 3 one has to use except OSError as e: But that only works on python 2.6 and newer. So the question is: any objections to dropping support for python 2.5? Python 2.6 was released 01-Oct-2008, so it should be available everywhere. Cheers, Rafael