search for: 11u

...t;> back the consensus of the committee as to what to do :) >>> >> >> The ambiguous names are probably incorrect - having two distinct types >> that have the same name's not really going to work out well for a consumer. >> (so having the distinct types foo<11u> and foo<11> in source both produce a >> DWARF type named "foo<11>" I'd say is a bug that ought to be fixed - as is >> any other case where the names become ambiguous, otherwise matching up >> types between TUs would become impossible, which would be n...

...u IPv4 1180771 0t0 TCP *:8140 (LISTEN) puppet 23542 puppet 9w REG 252,1 71 2621 /var/log/puppet/rails.log puppet 23542 puppet 10u REG 252,1 156672 2684 /var/lib/puppet/state/clientconfigs.sqlite3 puppet 23542 puppet 11u REG 252,1 156672 2684 /var/lib/puppet/state/clientconfigs.sqlite3 Next run: > lsof -np $(pgrep puppet) ... puppet 23542 puppet 7u IPv4 1180771 0t0 TCP *:8140 (LISTEN) puppet 23542 puppet 9w REG 252,1 71 2621 /v...

...ot at bedrock ~]# netstat --inet --program --numeric --listen | grep syslog udp????????0??????0 0.0.0.0:51427???????????0.0.0.0:*????????66655/rsyslogd [root at bedrock ~]# lsof -i -P | grep LISTEN? rpcbind?????810??????rpc????8u??IPv4???19806??????0t0??TCP *:111 (LISTEN) rpcbind?????810??????rpc???11u??IPv6???19809??????0t0??TCP *:111 (LISTEN) sshd???????1156?????root????3u??IPv4???23045??????0t0??TCP *:22 (LISTEN) sshd???????1156?????root????4u??IPv6???23047??????0t0??TCP *:22 (LISTEN) snmpd??????1158?????root????8u??IPv4???26937??????0t0??TCP localhost:199 (LISTEN) rpc.statd??1196??rpcuser????...

...g list, and bring >> back the consensus of the committee as to what to do :) >> > > The ambiguous names are probably incorrect - having two distinct types > that have the same name's not really going to work out well for a consumer. > (so having the distinct types foo<11u> and foo<11> in source both produce a > DWARF type named "foo<11>" I'd say is a bug that ought to be fixed - as is > any other case where the names become ambiguous, otherwise matching up > types between TUs would become impossible, which would be not good) &gt...

...l tftpd 20782 0 8u sock 0,5 2952758 can't identify protocol tftpd 20782 0 9u sock 0,5 2953809 can't identify protocol tftpd 20782 0 10u sock 0,5 2959221 can't identify protocol tftpd 20782 0 11u sock 0,5 2965427 can't identify protocol tftpd 20782 0 12u sock 0,5 2968500 can't identify protocol ....... ...... tftpd 20782 0 1019u sock 0,5 4833123 can't identify protocol tftpd 20782 0 1020u sock...

...bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 But my Asterisk instance does not pick the call at all. When I check the listening apps using lsof -i I get asterisk 3046 asterisk 7u IPv4 1191172 0t0 TCP *:5038 (LISTEN) asterisk 3046 asterisk 10u IPv4 1191186 0t0 UDP *:sip asterisk 3046 asterisk 11u IPv4 1191187 0t0 TCP *:sip (LISTEN) asterisk 3046 asterisk 13u IPv4 1191196 0t0 UDP *:iax asterisk 3046 asterisk 15u IPv4 1191199 0t0 UDP *:commplex-main asterisk 3046 asterisk 16u IPv4 1191201 0t0 UDP *:4520 asterisk 3046 asterisk 19u IPv4 1191232...

...nd discuss it on the mailing list, and bring > back the consensus of the committee as to what to do :) > The ambiguous names are probably incorrect - having two distinct types that have the same name's not really going to work out well for a consumer. (so having the distinct types foo<11u> and foo<11> in source both produce a DWARF type named "foo<11>" I'd say is a bug that ought to be fixed - as is any other case where the names become ambiguous, otherwise matching up types between TUs would become impossible, which would be not good) > 2. The fail...

...t;> back the consensus of the committee as to what to do :) >>> >> >> The ambiguous names are probably incorrect - having two distinct types >> that have the same name's not really going to work out well for a consumer. >> (so having the distinct types foo<11u> and foo<11> in source both produce a >> DWARF type named "foo<11>" I'd say is a bug that ought to be fixed - as is >> any other case where the names become ambiguous, otherwise matching up >> types between TUs would become impossible, which would be n...

...ensus of the committee as to what to do :) >>>> >>> >>> The ambiguous names are probably incorrect - having two distinct types >>> that have the same name's not really going to work out well for a consumer. >>> (so having the distinct types foo<11u> and foo<11> in source both produce a >>> DWARF type named "foo<11>" I'd say is a bug that ought to be fixed - as is >>> any other case where the names become ambiguous, otherwise matching up >>> types between TUs would become impossible, whic...

Attempting to lookup why rsyslogd is listening on the high port UDP/51427. Have not succeeded in what this port is used for and what directive controls what interface it binds to. [root at bedrock ~]# netstat --listen --inet --program --numeric | grep syslog udp??0??0 0.0.0.0:51427??0.0.0.0:*???66655/rsyslogd? -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam at whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383

...sterisk instance does not pick the call at all. > > When I check the listening apps using lsof -i I get > > asterisk 3046 asterisk 7u IPv4 1191172 0t0 TCP *:5038 (LISTEN) > asterisk 3046 asterisk 10u IPv4 1191186 0t0 UDP *:sip > asterisk 3046 asterisk 11u IPv4 1191187 0t0 TCP *:sip (LISTEN) > asterisk 3046 asterisk 13u IPv4 1191196 0t0 UDP *:iax > asterisk 3046 asterisk 15u IPv4 1191199 0t0 UDP *:commplex-main > asterisk 3046 asterisk 16u IPv4 1191201 0t0 UDP *:4520 > asterisk 3046 asterisk...

Could you help a poor helpless guy how to get information to use samba under a linux virtual server? which port are used by samba? Pierre -- _______ | 0 0 | ------------00---O---00o----------------- Pierre Binet Service d'Etat a l'Aviation Civile Division Technique BP 6011 98702 Faa'a/Aeroport mail :binet_pierre@seac.pf tel :(00 689) 861261

...2123 pipe | nmbd 23058 root 8u REG 104,7 696 293191 /var/run/samba/messages.tdb | nmbd 23058 root 9u IPv4 532126 UDP *:netbios-ns | nmbd 23058 root 10u IPv4 532127 UDP *:netbios-dgm | nmbd 23058 root 11u IPv4 532129 UDP bertha.meitner.priv:netbios-ns | nmbd 23058 root 12u IPv4 532130 UDP bertha.meitner.priv:netbios-dgm | nmbd 23058 root 13r FIFO 0,7 532131 pipe | nmbd 23058 root 14w FIFO 0,7...

...rs do not emit linkage name of type to debug information, and so debuggers can't link RTTI with DW_TAG_*_types reliably. Consider example: //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// enum class EN{ONE,TWO}; template<auto x> struct foo { virtual ~foo() {} }; foo<11u> fu; foo<11> fi; foo<EN::ONE> fe; //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Clang will put following names to RTTI: 3fooILi11EE -> foo<11> 3fooILj11EE -> foo<11u> 3fooIL2EN0EE -> foo<(EN)0> And...

...766 root 7w REG 8,1 156889 44594 /var/log/xend.log dhcpd3 766 root 8u REG 0,2 0 4569 /proc/xen/privcmd dhcpd3 766 root 9u CHR 1,1 107604 /dev/mem dhcpd3 766 root 10u unix 0xc66213e0 37020 socket dhcpd3 766 root 11u raw 37019 00000000:0001->00000000:0000 st=07 dhcpd3 766 root 12u REG 0,2 0 4569 /proc/xen/privcmd dhcpd3 766 root 13u REG 0,2 0 4569 /proc/xen/privcmd dhcpd3 766 root 14u CHR 1,1 107604 /dev/mem dhc...

...IPv6 1315537 0t0 UDP *:PPP tincd 15136 root 9u IPv4 1315541 0t0 TCP XX.XX.XX.XX:PP->XX.XX.XX.XX:PP (ESTABLISHED) tincd 15136 root 10u IPv4 1315542 0t0 TCP XX.XX.XX.XX:PP->XX.XX.XX.XX:PP (ESTABLISHED) tincd 15136 root 11u IPv4 1315543 0t0 TCP XX.XX.XX.XX:PP->XX.XX.XX.XX:PP (ESTABLISHED) tincd 15136 root 12u IPv4 1315554 0t0 TCP XX.XX.XX.XX:PP->XX.XX.XX.XX:PP (ESTABLISHED) -U Can I use user nobody or shall I better use an extra tincvpn user ? Right now tinc is runn...

...5,149 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa7680b8) dovecot-a 26071 root 10u unix 105,266 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa765d48) dovecot-a 26071 root 11u unix 105,160 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa7667e0) dovecot-a 26071 root 12u unix 105,255 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa769288) dovecot-...

...5,149 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa7680b8) dovecot-a 26071 root 10u unix 105,266 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa765d48) dovecot-a 26071 root 11u unix 105,160 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa7667e0) dovecot-a 26071 root 12u unix 105,255 0t79 3190 /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots->/var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login/default (0x3cbaa769288) dovecot-...

...59, id 54722, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 60) dsl001-148-165.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net.39250 > mail.server.com.imaps: S [tcp sum ok] 3827175783:3827175783(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1555810196 0,nop,wscale 2> LSOF: /var/log 91# lsof -i | grep imap sshd 4475 andrew 11u IPv4 39601 TCP localhost:34661->localhost:imaps (ESTABLISHED) dovecot 6540 root 5u IPv4 38988 TCP *:imaps (LISTEN) imap-logi 6599 dovecot 9u IPv4 39602 TCP localhost:imaps->localhost:34661 (ESTABLISHED) imap-logi 6629 dovecot 1u IPv4 38988 TC...

Hi there, when I try to start the nmbd -D daemon on my OpenServer5.0.5 box, I'll get the errormessage in log.nmbd: [...] [2002/03/12 19:30:18, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:(783) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.3a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/03/12 19:30:18, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(789) bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use