search for: 11sp3

...brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev < >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11SP3 x86_64 >>> >>> Looks like I see several failures that weren't in 3.7.1. Is there any >>> way to tell whether these are regressions vs new-to-3.8.0-but-failing? The >>> MSan ones were in 3.7.1 but the ThreadPoolTest and the libc++ errors were >>> no...

On 18 November 2015 at 01:09, Brian Cain via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Tom, I tried building 3.7.0 for SuSE Linux Enterprise 11SP3. It failed to > build some specific test cases for lack of specific (new) pthread function > declarations. Assuming the problem is that the glibc is too old to be > supported by clang/llvm, can I build a 3.7.1 release against musl instead? Was Suse's 3.7.0 built against Musl? --ren...

I have setup a SAMBA 3 cluster (running on SLES-11sp3) with 2 nodes. CTDB is managing SAMBA, using a floating IP between the two hosts. Everything is running fine as far as the cluster fail-over, etc. However, the SAMBA cluster server(s) are supposed to be member servers, connecting to an existing PDC which is using LDAP as the password backend. CTDB...

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11SP3 x86_64 > > Looks like I see several failures that weren't in 3.7.1. Is there any way > to tell whether these are regressions vs new-to-3.8.0-but-failing? The > MSan ones were in 3.7.1 but the ThreadPoolTest and the libc++ errors were > not in 3.7.1. > > All of the libc++...

Hello List, in the following environment SUSE Linux Enterprise 11SP3 with bind 9.9.4P2 and the Sernet samba packages in version 4.1.7. samba works as AD PDC. Every few days our bind dns server denies updates. It looks like a problem with kerberos and the bind_dlz driver: Jul 2 08:04:21 s4ad named[22579]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone baettenhausen.lo...

Hi, I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so I've decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9. I would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up going into llvm 3.7.2. I am currently working

Hi, There was one problem in -rc1, so we had to do another release candidate. -rc2 has now been tagged and is ready for testing. -Tom

...at 8:31 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev > >>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11SP3 x86_64 > >>>> > >>>> Looks like I see several failures that weren't in 3.7.1. Is there any > >>>> way to tell whether these are regressions vs > new-to-3.8.0-but-failing? The > >>>> MSan ones were in 3.7.1 but the ThreadPoolTest a...

(cc'ing non-legacy llvm-dev this time; apologies if you get this twice. Please don't reply-all to the first one.) On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > Start your engines; 3.8.0-rc1 was just tagged from the 3.8 branch at > r258223. (It took a little longer than I'd planned, sorry about that.) > > There