Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "11901".
Did you mean:
1101
2011 Jul 27
1
create a index.date column
...L, 478L, 478L, 484L, 484L, 484L, 484L,
484L, 486L, 486L, 486L, 487L, 487L, 487L, 487L, 487L), ftime = structure(c(11761,
11824, 11925, 11852, 11814, 11814, 11929, 11929, 11902, 11857,
11779, 11779, 11807, 11841, 11871, 11899, 11831, 11894, 11925,
11761, 11801, 11843, 11905, 11832, 11877, 11838, 11901, 11783,
11783, 11818, 11850, 11750, 11782, 11905, 11852, 11877, 11852,
11922, 11855, 11838, 11845, 11878, 11901, 11927, 11795, 11817,
11837, 11901, 11928, 11853, 11751, 11751, 11877, 11922, 11760,
11914, 11857, 11912, 11752, 11752, 11785, 11785, 11825, 11825,
11862, 11862, 11891, 11891, 11926,...
2003 Oct 23
0
WAS: Call pickup (*8) on SIP devices. Bug #116
...1.15>;tag=as6a2a2007
To: <sip:192.168.1.181>
Contact: <sip:5285@192.168.1.15>
Call-ID: 08cf93d712ecba2703837fed6f933068@192.168.1.15
CSeq: 102 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 180
v=0
o=root 11901 11901 IN IP4 192.168.1.15
s=session
c=IN IP4 192.168.1.15
t=0 0
m=audio 11596 RTP/AVP 0 8 3
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
(no NAT) to 192.168.1.181:5060
-- Called test1
Sip read:
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.15:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0f90d445
From:...
2006 Jul 12
1
Converting Datetime in view
I have some views that show dates and have done the conversion in the .rhtml
file itself. Does it make more sense to do that in the model file perhaps ?
TIA
Stuart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060712/b1735c44/attachment.html
2014 Mar 04
0
[PATCH v5 3/8] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
...32 1315 1102
3 1827 2372 2681
4 2689 2934 5392
5 3736 3658 7696
6 4942 4434 9876
7 6304 5176 11901
8 7736 5955 14551
Below is the code that I used:
static inline u32 queue_code_xchg(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 *ocode,
u32 ncode)
{
while (true) {
u32 qlcode = atomic_read(&lock->qlcode);
if (qlcode == 0) {...
2014 Mar 04
1
[PATCH v5 3/8] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
...1102
> 3 1827 2372 2681
> 4 2689 2934 5392
> 5 3736 3658 7696
> 6 4942 4434 9876
> 7 6304 5176 11901
> 8 7736 5955 14551
>
I'm just not seeing that; with test-4 modified to take the AMD compute
units into account:
root at interlagos:~/spinlocks# LOCK=./qspinlock-pending-opt ./test-4.sh ; LOCK=./qspinlock-pending-opt2 ./test-4.sh
4: 50783.509653
8:...
2014 Mar 04
1
[PATCH v5 3/8] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
...1102
> 3 1827 2372 2681
> 4 2689 2934 5392
> 5 3736 3658 7696
> 6 4942 4434 9876
> 7 6304 5176 11901
> 8 7736 5955 14551
>
I'm just not seeing that; with test-4 modified to take the AMD compute
units into account:
root at interlagos:~/spinlocks# LOCK=./qspinlock-pending-opt ./test-4.sh ; LOCK=./qspinlock-pending-opt2 ./test-4.sh
4: 50783.509653
8:...
2014 Mar 03
5
[PATCH v5 3/8] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
Hi,
Here are some numbers for my version -- also attached is the test code.
I found that booting big machines is tediously slow so I lifted the
whole lot to userspace.
I measure the cycles spend in arch_spin_lock() + arch_spin_unlock().
The machines used are a 4 node (2 socket) AMD Interlagos, and a 2 node
(2 socket) Intel Westmere-EP.
AMD (ticket) AMD (qspinlock + pending + opt)
Local:
2014 Mar 03
5
[PATCH v5 3/8] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
Hi,
Here are some numbers for my version -- also attached is the test code.
I found that booting big machines is tediously slow so I lifted the
whole lot to userspace.
I measure the cycles spend in arch_spin_lock() + arch_spin_unlock().
The machines used are a 4 node (2 socket) AMD Interlagos, and a 2 node
(2 socket) Intel Westmere-EP.
AMD (ticket) AMD (qspinlock + pending + opt)
Local:
2016 Dec 15
0
memory leak 4.4.5. but where and is it fixed already?
...y leak around poptGetOptArg()
But i dont know how this is samba related.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11985 but i dont use CTDB.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7902 Memory problems in pidl python bindings maybe ?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11901 Reparenting in a destructor incorrectly terminates freeing of children leading to a memory leak.
Maybe , looks more like it.
Software used :
ii ldb-tools 2:1.1.26-1~bpo8+1 amd64 LDAP-like embedded database - tools
ii libldb1:amd64 ...
2011 Jun 28
0
builder-ubuntu libguestfs FAILED tests 21c118a20e625dccd7cbd454f67a9f9c360c53f1
...-ftell2.sh
PASS: test-ftell3
PASS: test-ftello.sh
PASS: test-ftello2.sh
PASS: test-ftello3
PASS: test-futimens
PASS: test-getaddrinfo
PASS: test-getcwd-lgpl
PASS: test-getdelim
PASS: test-getdtablesize
PASS: test-getgroups
PASS: test-getline
test-getlogin_r.c:44: assertion failed
/bin/bash: line 5: 11901 Aborted (core dumped) EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' LOCALE_FR='none' LOCALE_FR_UTF8='none' LOCALE_FR='none' LOCALE_FR_UTF8='none' LOCALE_JA='none' LOCALE_ZH_CN='none' LOCALE_FR_UTF8='none' LOCALE_FR='none' LOCALE...