search for: 118mb

..." Command Error: <The driver could not execute the requested IOCTL SENDFIB, 22=Invalid argument.> I have "options AAC_COMPAT_LINUX" in the kernel config and dmesg shows: aac0: <Dell PERC 3/Di> mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff irq 16 at device 8.1 on pci4 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 118MB cache memory, optional battery present aac0: Kernel 2.7-1, Build 3170, S/N 6841d3 aac0: Supported Options=75c<WCACHE,DATA64,HOSTTIME,WINDOW4GB,SOFTERR,NORECOND,SGMAP64> [ .. ] aacd0: <RAID 1 (Mirror)> on aac0 aacd0: 34712MB (71091456 sectors) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s2a...

...many would be much smaller too. So breaking them into smaller blocks would be necessary for many samples. I guess varying blocksize compression is really what would be the best. Any ideas of when this might be available? Compression is good as things stand now, although not optimal. I compressed a 118MB sound font to 64MB with FLAC which was only 3MB difference to sfArk (only 170k of this is non-audio data which would be more significant with smaller sound fonts). Lates.. Josh Green

...breaking them into > smaller blocks would be necessary for many samples. > I guess varying > blocksize compression is really what would be the > best. Any ideas of > when this might be available? Compression is good as > things stand now, > although not optimal. I compressed a 118MB sound > font to 64MB with FLAC > which was only 3MB difference to sfArk (only 170k of > this is non-audio > data which would be more significant with smaller > sound fonts). > ok, in the case where each 'sample' is long (like >64k samples (sorry to mix terminology here)...

I've been doing some more tests with compressing sound fonts with FLAC. It compares quite well with sfArk which is a common compression used on the internet for sound fonts, unfortunately its not open. For the most part, in my tests, sfArk beats FLAC in compression, but thats not surprising as I am compressing entire sound fonts which include non-audio data as well. The average compression

...#1 intpin 15 -> irq 17 pci5: <PCI bus> on pcib8 pci5: <unknown card> (vendor=0x9005, dev=0x00c5) at 6.0 irq 16 pci5: <unknown card> (vendor=0x9005, dev=0x00c5) at 6.1 irq 17 aac0: <Dell PERC 3/Di> mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff irq 16 at device 8.1 on pci4 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 118MB cache memory, optional battery present aac0: Kernel 2.7-1, Build 3170, S/N bc10d3 aac0: Supported Options=75c<WCACHE,DATA64,HOSTTIME,WINDOW4GB,SOFTERR,NORECOND,SGMAP64> pcib5: <ServerWorks host to PCI bridge(unknown chipset)> on motherboard pci6: <PCI bus> on pcib5 pcib6: <Serv...

...intpin 15 -> irq 20 pci7: <PCI bus> on pcib10 pci7: <unknown card> (vendor=0x9005, dev=0x00c5) at 6.0 irq 19 pci7: <unknown card> (vendor=0x9005, dev=0x00c5) at 6.1 irq 20 aac0: <Dell PERC 3/Di> mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff irq 19 at device 8.1 on pci6 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 118MB cache memory, optional battery present aac0: Kernel 2.7-1, Build 3170, S/N 9c38d3 pcib5: <Host to PCI bridge> on motherboard pci8: <PCI bus> on pcib5 pcib6: <Host to PCI bridge> on motherboard pci9: <PCI bus> on pcib6 pcib7: <Host to PCI bridge> on motherboard pci10: &...

...o. Your nvme vendor extension patches reduces greatly the number of MMIO writes. So I'd like to push it upstream. I port these 2 patches to newer kernel and qemu. I use ram disk as backend to compare performance. qemu-nvme: 29MB/s qemu-nvme+google-ext: 100MB/s virtio-blk: 174MB/s virtio-scsi: 118MB/s I'll show you qemu-vhost-nvme+google-ext number later. root at guest:~# cat test.job [global] bs=4k ioengine=libaio iodepth=64 direct=1 runtime=120 time_based rw=randread norandommap group_reporting gtod_reduce=1 numjobs=2 [job1] filename=/dev/nvme0n1 #filename=/dev/vdb #filename=/dev/sda...

...o. Your nvme vendor extension patches reduces greatly the number of MMIO writes. So I'd like to push it upstream. I port these 2 patches to newer kernel and qemu. I use ram disk as backend to compare performance. qemu-nvme: 29MB/s qemu-nvme+google-ext: 100MB/s virtio-blk: 174MB/s virtio-scsi: 118MB/s I'll show you qemu-vhost-nvme+google-ext number later. root at guest:~# cat test.job [global] bs=4k ioengine=libaio iodepth=64 direct=1 runtime=120 time_based rw=randread norandommap group_reporting gtod_reduce=1 numjobs=2 [job1] filename=/dev/nvme0n1 #filename=/dev/vdb #filename=/dev/sda...

Recent SUP. Installed on Dell PowerEdge 4600. Getting tons of: Sep 30 12:23:16 zige /kernel: bge0: gigabit link up Sep 30 12:23:46 zige last message repeated 98 times Also getting some TCP retransmits. This causes noticable delays in pretty much everything I do now. Not a problem prior to the SUP. I was on 4.8-STABLE before. When pulling/replacing cables, it went into a mode where it would