Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "118683".
2008 Jun 20
1
CESA-2008:0556 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) freetype - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/freetype-2.1.4-8.el3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/freetype-demos-2.1.4-8.el3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/freetype-devel-2.1.4-8.el3.s390.rpm
2018 May 10
1
Using C++14 code in LLVM
...ut it doesn’t matter if we stick to C++14.
FWIW I still think (1) it's too early to upgrade to c++17, and (2) we
don't get enough from c++14 for the upgrade to really be worth it. See
the thread from a few months ago for more detail:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118683.html
2015 Oct 04
27
[Bug 92274] New: nouveau black screen and errors with two monitors attached
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92274
Bug ID: 92274
Summary: nouveau black screen and errors with two monitors
attached
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component:
2018 May 10
0
Using C++14 code in LLVM
> On May 10, 2018, at 11:35 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>
> If it's the only thing we can agree then I'll take it, but I just worry that 3 years from now we're going to start another 3 year discussion, so that any actual move to C++17 would end up taking double the time.
Such a fatalistic view, let’s trust ourselves to be better next time ;-)
But
2018 May 10
5
Using C++14 code in LLVM
If it's the only thing we can agree then I'll take it, but I just worry
that 3 years from now we're going to start another 3 year discussion, so
that any actual move to C++17 would end up taking double the time.
Are the issues specific to C++17 additions to the standard library? What
if you allow C++17 language features but not C++17 library features? I'm
guessing this is too
2007 Dec 09
8
zpool kernel panics.
Hi Folks,
I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris
10 280r (SPARC) server.
The message I get on panic is this:
panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment
(offset=423713792 size=1024)
This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being
scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the
scrub seems to have